Deranged Rhino Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 Wait, so is it Obama's foreign policy? Or Mk-Ultra's? Or the Aliens? Or the aliens running Mk-Ultra foreign policy? None of the above. Its US policy dictated to them by their corporate owners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 None of the above. Its US policy dictated to them by their corporate owners. But the corporations are all run by aliens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 But the corporations are all run by aliens That's a conversation for a different day. (You owe me a keyboard) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 (edited) Ways it was worse than Bush's... 1. Interventionist/destabilizing activities in even more countries 2. Hillary SoS 3. Expanding to other theatres Ways it was better ... 1. 99.9% lapdog to Israeli's and Saudis* 2. Nuclear agreement with Iran 3. Diplomatic relations with Cuba * down 100% from predecessors Edited May 14, 2016 by truth on hold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted May 15, 2016 Share Posted May 15, 2016 Wait, so is it Obama's foreign policy? Or Mk-Ultra's? Or the Aliens? Or the aliens running Mk-Ultra foreign policy? What difference, at this point, does it make? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 15, 2016 Share Posted May 15, 2016 Obama's foreign policy is to take long trips there often and make speeches about how America is a great nation because it produced him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted May 15, 2016 Share Posted May 15, 2016 This is the definition of "Policy": A policy is a deliberate system of principles to guide decisions and achieve rational outcomes. A policy is a statement of intent, and is implemented as a procedure or protocol. Policies are generally adopted by the Board of or senior governance body within an organization whereas procedures or protocols would be developed and adopted by senior executive officers. Policies can assist in both subjective and objective decision making. Policies to assist in subjective decision making would usually assist senior management with decisions that must consider the relative merits of a number of factors before making decisions and as a result are often hard to objectively test e.g. work-life balance policy. In contrast policies to assist in objective decision making are usually operational in nature and can be objectively tested e.g. password policy.[1] The term may apply to government, private sector organizations and groups, as well as individuals. Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from rules or law. While law can compel or prohibit behaviors (e.g. a law requiring the payment of taxes on income), policy merely guides actions toward those that are most likely to achieve a desired outcome.[citation needed] Policy or policy study may also refer to the process of making important organizational decisions, including the identification of different alternatives such as programs or spending priorities, and choosing among them on the basis of the impact they will have. Policies can be understood as political, managerial, financial, and administrative mechanisms arranged to reach explicit goals. In public corporate finance, a critical accounting policy is a policy for a firm/company or an industry which is considered to have a notably high subjective element, and that has a material impact on the financial statements.[citation needed] This is the definition of "Chaos": 1.complete disorder and confusion. OP, please change the title of this thread to reflect reality. Interesting that 3rd focused on the word policy. I was struck by the word foreign. Foreign in the non-native, alien sense. It seems to me that most of POTUS' actions, pronouncements, executive orders, etc. have been foreign when seen in the context of our nation as a whole. Nearly all of this administration's activities have focused on the groups that elected the current POTUS. There is little or no sense that BHO is the President of the United States; just of the groups that put him in control. Of all the corruptions perpetrated by this administration, ignoring the welfare of the nation as a whole is most egregious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2016 Share Posted May 15, 2016 (edited) Brazil’s Democracy to Suffer Grievous Blow as Unelectable, Corrupt Neoliberal Is Installed Edited May 15, 2016 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 16, 2016 Author Share Posted May 16, 2016 None of the above. Its US policy dictated to them by their corporate owners. So what about Israel? How do they fit into that paradigm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 NOBEL PEACE PRIZE UPDATE: For Obama, an Unexpected Legacy of Two Full Terms at War, Longer Than Any Other President. This is what happens when you wage war half-heartedly, by committee, and on the cheap. ” President Obama came into office seven years ago pledging to end the wars of his predecessor, George W. Bush. On May 6, with eight months left before he vacates the White House, Mr. Obama passed a somber, little-noticed milestone: He has now been at war longer than Mr. Bush, or any other American president.” Of course, it’s “little noticed” because the press didn’t want people to notice it, because he’s a Democrat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 16, 2016 Author Share Posted May 16, 2016 NOBEL PEACE PRIZE UPDATE: For Obama, an Unexpected Legacy of Two Full Terms at War, Longer Than Any Other President. This is what happens when you wage war half-heartedly, by committee, and on the cheap. ” President Obama came into office seven years ago pledging to end the wars of his predecessor, George W. Bush. On May 6, with eight months left before he vacates the White House, Mr. Obama passed a somber, little-noticed milestone: He has now been at war longer than Mr. Bush, or any other American president.” Of course, it’s “little noticed” because the press didn’t want people to notice it, because he’s a Democrat. Yes, all those American soldiers getting killed everyday and all. Oh wait, no. Such unfair coverage of wars where are soldiers are not getting killed everyday. Moron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Yes, all those American soldiers getting killed everyday and all. Oh wait, no. Such unfair coverage of wars where are soldiers are not getting killed everyday. Moron When calling someone a moron it's best to not display your own propensity for being a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Obama has now been at war longer than any other American president. This is what his wars look like today: U.S. Combat Missions May End, but Fighting Goes On http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/us/politics/combat-missions-obama-questions-answers.html?ref=topics&_r=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 So what about Israel? How do they fit into that paradigm? Into what paradigm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Into what paradigm? He doesn't know what paradigm means lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Mission accomplished! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 16, 2016 Author Share Posted May 16, 2016 Into what paradigm? Of listening to their "corporate owners" of foreign policy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 He doesn't know what paradigm means lol He's just trying to offer us his two cents. But he's a special snowflake whose opinion is worth 10x a normal opinion so his two cents are worth a par of dimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 16, 2016 Author Share Posted May 16, 2016 He's just trying to offer us his two cents. But he's a special snowflake whose opinion is worth 10x a normal opinion so his two cents are worth a par of dimes Go crawl back under your rock loser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts