Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's truly sad that you dumbasses stick to the same narrative that was proven wrong by not only the police but a jury. George Zimmermann may be a POS but he was well within his rights to defend himself from potential death.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

He had a gun and started openly following the kid. Zimmerman was looking to provoke a fight so he could shoot the kid, imo

So how did he get the wounds?

 

That's a lot of conjecture to vote guilty on a jury.

 

 

Helps to not chase after people who wear hoodies and enjoy candy.

 

Ole Georgie must have lived in gangland. He called the cops 5.75 times a year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

"He became the self-appointed protector of the streets around his home, although his neighborhood watch organization was not officially registered. Over the past eight years, he called the Police Department at least 46 times with reports of various sightings. In 2005, according to police records obtained by the Orlando Sentinel and other media, Zimmerman was twice accused of either criminal misconduct or violence. He had a concealed-weapon permit and had a black Kel-Tec semi­automatic handgun and a holster the night Martin died."

 

http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/in-trayvon-martin-shooting-background-of-george-zimmerman-can-confound/1221662

None of this means he can't defend himself.

 

Even if you give ZImmerman the biggest benefit of the doubt, chasing the kid was stupid. 100% agree. But guess what? That makes what happened a tragedy that may have been avoided, not a crime.

 

Also, twice accused of either criminal misconduct or violence? So accused once of misconduct and once of violence orrrrrr? Stupid way to phrase that.

Edited by FireChan
Posted

He got his wounds from confronting a person he should not have confronted. He had a gun so he was aggressive. Jury verdicts are hardly infallible

Posted

He got his wounds from confronting a person he should not have confronted. He had a gun so he was aggressive. Jury verdicts are hardly infallible

Zimmerman broke no laws. What he should or should not have done is immaterial to the verdict.

 

You don't know he was "aggressive" or what that would even entail. The evidence against him was shaky at best.

 

We will never know if the jury was right or wrong. All we know is that a jury of his peers did not believe beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed a crime, and that's the standard we live by.

 

Honest question, for you and RLB. If you were on that jury, do you vote guilty? You don't have a shred of doubt this was just some !@#$ who acted like an !@#$, and then some other !@#$ scuffled with him and the original !@#$ got beat up?

Posted

 

"Reuters)

When George Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin the night of Feb. 26, 2012, he ignored an admonition not to do so from the police dispatcher. The request for his arrest, written by the lead detective, noted that Zimmerman’s killing of Trayvon could have been avoided if he’d remained in his vehicle or identified himself “as a concerned citizen.” Just what in Zimmerman’s past might have led him to take these actions and kill an unarmed teenager with a gunshot to the chest is relevant in this case"

 

 

Id reassign him to Border Patrol, put him in the middle of the desert, let him take out his aggressions on suspicious people there.

Posted

"Reuters)

When George Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin the night of Feb. 26, 2012, he ignored an admonition not to do so from the police dispatcher. The request for his arrest, written by the lead detective, noted that Zimmerman’s killing of Trayvon could have been avoided if he’d remained in his vehicle or identified himself “as a concerned citizen.” Just what in Zimmerman’s past might have led him to take these actions and kill an unarmed teenager with a gunshot to the chest is relevant in this case"

 

 

Id reassign him to Border Patrol, put him in the middle of the desert, let him take out his aggressions on suspicious people there.

Answer my question bro.

Posted (edited)

"Reuters)

When George Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin the night of Feb. 26, 2012, he ignored an admonition not to do so from the police dispatcher. The request for his arrest, written by the lead detective, noted that Zimmerman’s killing of Trayvon could have been avoided if he’d remained in his vehicle or identified himself “as a concerned citizen.” Just what in Zimmerman’s past might have led him to take these actions and kill an unarmed teenager with a gunshot to the chest is relevant in this case"

 

 

Id reassign him to Border Patrol, put him in the middle of the desert, let him take out his aggressions on suspicious people there.

Why don't you provide the link to that nonsense? It sounds a lot like what you dumbasses were saying early on in the case and have not let go of. At the time there were several of us here who cautioned you dumbasses regarding jumping to conclusions. As it played out GZ did not chase TM down but partially followed him until he was told by the 911 dispatcher to not follow him. The dispatcher asked GZ for an address and GZ went around the corner to get it and then attempted to return to his vehicle. In the meantime TM walked all the way back to his father's place and then decided to return to where GZ's vehicle had been parked. TM attacked GZ near the vehicle and was on top of him slamming GZ's head to the concrete. The physical evidence bears this out. GZ shot TM in self defense. You're still at the dumbass narrative that was put out shortly after the shooting. You haven't taken any of the evidence and figured out anything other than you'd rather be stubborn and stupid than to change your mind. "There are none so blind as those who refuse to see".

Edited by 3rdnlng
Posted

He got his wounds from confronting a person he should not have confronted. He had a gun so he was aggressive. Jury verdicts are hardly infallible

 

Who confronted who again?

Posted

I can't do that without being in that courtroom. Lot of smoke though.

The whole thing was broadcasted. We all know what happened. Shoot your shot.

Posted (edited)

The whole thing was broadcasted. We all know what happened. Shoot your shot.

Some people work during the day, but I'd lean towards guilty based on his past as a guy whose always stirring up the pot. Went to hr on coworkers 30x more than a normal human would. Called cops 46 times from home. The guys a shmo.

Why don't you provide the link to that nonsense? It sounds a lot like what you dumbasses were saying early on in the case and have not let go of. At the time there were several of us here who cautioned you dumbasses regarding jumping to conclusions. As it played out GZ did not chase TM down but partially followed him until he was told by the 911 dispatcher to not follow him. The dispatcher asked GZ for an address and GZ went around the corner to get it and then attempted to return to his vehicle. In the meantime TM walked all the way back to his father's place and then decided to return to where GZ's vehicle had been parked. TM attacked GZ near the vehicle and was on top of him slamming GZ's head to the concrete. The physical evidence bears this out. GZ shot TM in self defense. You're still at the dumbass narrative that was put out shortly after the shooting. You haven't taken any of the evidence and figured out anything other than you'd rather be stubborn and stupid than to change your mind. "There are none so blind as those who refuse to see".

Reuters bro. Cool stories. Edited by Ryan L Billz
Posted

Some people work during the day, but I'd lean towards guilty based on his past as a guy whose always stirring up the pot. Went to hr on coworkers 30x more than a normal human would. Called cops 46 times from home. The guys a shmo.

Reuters bro. Cool stories.

I realize you lean guilty. That's obvious. I'm asking if you lean guilty enough to cast a vote that way.

Posted (edited)

Some people work during the day, but I'd lean towards guilty based on his past as a guy whose always stirring up the pot. Went to hr on coworkers 30x more than a normal human would. Called cops 46 times from home. The guys a shmo.

Reuters bro. Cool stories.

That's not the link. It's common protocol to provide links to what one quotes. If you don't do it something is fishy, like the date. It sounds like that article was first published shortly after the shooting when many of you dumbasses were jumping to conclusions. You've shown your inability to grow and learn by sticking to your dumbass narrative even though the facts prove differently. I wonder if it's the weed that makes you so duckdog dumb?

 

"Some people work during the day" is the equivalent of saying you don't actually know anything about the case but you still stick to your uninformed opinion.

Edited by 3rdnlng
Posted

 

Who confronted who again?

I know who was following who.

 

And one thing that really bothered me about the trial was how Zimmerman's video testimony to the police was entered as evidence. That is totally wrong. It's like he was allowed to testify without being cross examined.

Posted

 

Search Results

 

Zimmerman opts not to testify as his defense team rests case - CNN.com

www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/zimmerman-trial/

CNN

Jul 11, 2013 - The effort to defend George Zimmerman against murder charges in Travyon Martin neared its ... Why did prosecutor, defense use a dummy?

 

George Zimmerman Tells Judge He Won't Testify - ABC News

abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-tells-judge-testify/story?id...

Jul 10, 2013 - George Zimmerman has told the judge he will not testify as his defense team rests their case in his murder trial.

 

George Zimmerman Prosecutor 'Prayed' for Him to Testify - ABC News

abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-prosecutor...testify/story?id...

Jul 15, 2013 - George Zimmerman Prosecutor 'Prayed' for Him to Testify. By Matt Gutman ... Why did you assume he didn't belong in the neighborhood?".

Posted (edited)

That's not the link. It's common protocol to provide links to what one quotes. If you don't do it something is fishy, like the date. It sounds like that article was first published shortly after the shooting when many of you dumbasses were jumping to conclusions. You've shown your inability to grow and learn by sticking to your dumbass narrative even though the facts prove differently. I wonder if it's the weed that makes you so duckdog dumb?"Some people work during the day" is the equivalent of saying you don't actually know anything about the case but you still stick to your uninformed opinion.

Or it says I'm not a bonafied psycho like you who is consumed with the case. It's clear you're guy is a wacko who jumps into situations as often as he can. Not guilty in Florida but Guilty in 40 plus other states without SYG law.

 

There's a reason "Florida man" is a meme/Jameis Winston gets shttt covered up, Dea agents beat up columbian people who they think they can steal drug money from.

 

Florida is fckkkkkkked.

Edited by Ryan L Billz
Posted

Or it says I'm not a bonafied psycho like you who is consumed with the case. It's clear you're guy is a wacko who jumps into situations as often as he can. Not guilty in Florida but Guilty in 40 plus other states without SYG law.

 

There's a reason "Florida man" is a meme/Jameis Winston gets shttt covered up, Dea agents beat up columbian people who they think they can steal drug money from.

 

Florida is fckkkkkkked.

Continue to confuse character issues with the facts of this case. BTW, this case was not decided on any SYG laws.

Posted

Well I tried but I couldn't outbid the $65m offered by Racist McShootface. Better luck next time.

 

According to you, everyone who doesn't think like you is Racist McShootface, which comprises pretty much most of the free world, so could you be more specific?

×
×
  • Create New...