Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think what Podesta is doing is the most interesting story in the NFL in years. It's unique.

The problem with the strip down strategy to accumulate draft picks is that success is predicated on good drafting. If your drafts turn out to be poor to average the over reliance on the draft to catapult you from misery to respectability won't work.

 

When a franchise such as Cleveland (and to a lesser extent Buffalo) becomes mired in generational failure it becomes an unappealing place to attract free agents. In today's NFL success is predicated on having a qb, good drafting, making smart mid-level free agent selections and organizational stability.

 

As you point out they are taking an all out and risky approach to rebuilding. And as you noted they will be an interesting team to follow. Sometimes you succeed through analytics and sometimes you fail because of the poor use of analytics. This will be a good case study.

  • Replies 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

The problem with the strip down strategy to accumulate draft picks is that success is predicated on good drafting. If your drafts turn out to be poor to average the over reliance on the draft to catapult you from misery to respectability won't work.

 

When a franchise such as Cleveland (and to a lesser extent Buffalo) becomes mired in generational failure it becomes an unappealing place to attract free agents. In today's NFL success is predicated on having a qb, good drafting, making smart mid-level free agent selections and organizational stability.

 

As you point out they are taking an all out and risky approach to rebuilding. And as you noted they will be an interesting team to follow. Sometimes you succeed through analytics and sometimes you fail because of the poor use of analytics. This will be a good case study.

 

 

I firmly believe success breeds success in the NFL. This isn't the NBA where you draft Lebron and it turns everything around. Even in baseball you can draft a group of kids and they have success together before the reach the Majors, similar to what happened with the Royals in their turn around. In the NFL guys need to perform almost at Day 1, if they aren't surrounded by vets who are able to help them both on and off the field you are going to end up with a whole team of guys who doesn't truly know what it takes.

 

 

Basically the Raiders did what the Browns are trying to do when McKenzie took over. But the Raiders didn't just sit on piles of unused cap space, they signed a bunch of veterans like Charles Woodson, Justin Tuck, Lamar Woodley. Those guys were at varying levels of still being able to play, but they were constant guides to the young players on the roster. Then they stayed at the top of the draft board, took elite players in Mack and Cooper, lucked into Carr in round 2 and immediately brought in good vets around them. It's too early in Cleveland's reset to make any judgements, but if they don't add elite players in this draft and aren't able to use their cap space on free agents with upside or vets willing to help younger guys out then this regime is just setting things up for the next one. Depth is very important in this league, but a roster full of B- players does not equate to an A- team.

Posted

 

 

I firmly believe success breeds success in the NFL. This isn't the NBA where you draft Lebron and it turns everything around. Even in baseball you can draft a group of kids and they have success together before the reach the Majors, similar to what happened with the Royals in their turn around. In the NFL guys need to perform almost at Day 1, if they aren't surrounded by vets who are able to help them both on and off the field you are going to end up with a whole team of guys who doesn't truly know what it takes.

 

 

Basically the Raiders did what the Browns are trying to do when McKenzie took over. But the Raiders didn't just sit on piles of unused cap space, they signed a bunch of veterans like Charles Woodson, Justin Tuck, Lamar Woodley. Those guys were at varying levels of still being able to play, but they were constant guides to the young players on the roster. Then they stayed at the top of the draft board, took elite players in Mack and Cooper, lucked into Carr in round 2 and immediately brought in good vets around them. It's too early in Cleveland's reset to make any judgements, but if they don't add elite players in this draft and aren't able to use their cap space on free agents with upside or vets willing to help younger guys out then this regime is just setting things up for the next one. Depth is very important in this league, but a roster full of B- players does not equate to an A- team.

Excellent post. Very incisive with good examples reinforcing your points.

 

Your point about getting the right mix of veteran players to show the young players how to prepare and act professionally is spot on. On a smaller scale hockey is another sport where the right mixture of players is needed to be successful.

Posted

Excellent post. Very incisive with good examples reinforcing your points.

 

Your point about getting the right mix of veteran players to show the young players how to prepare and act professionally is spot on. On a smaller scale hockey is another sport where the right mixture of players is needed to be successful.

 

this why Guys like Kyle, Woods, Ritchie and Graham shouldn't be traded.

Posted (edited)

 

this why Guys like Kyle, Woods, Ritchie and Graham shouldn't be traded.

I would trade Kyle Williams for the simple reason that I have so much respect for him. He is the embodiment of class, leadership and work ethic. He deserves better; he deserves to play in a playoff game. If I had my way I would virtually give him up for nothing to allow him to play for playoff caliber team such as Dallas. He, not having the opportunity to play in a post-season after such a long and distinguished career doesn't seem right.

 

As Chuck Wagon smartly posted it is important to have the right mix of players so that the younger players can witness for themselves what it means to be a successful pro. Without that guidance on and off the field their talents won't be fully exploited.

 

Buffalo not having a franchise qb for 20 years and not making the playoffs for 18 years is a disgrace and an embarrassment.

 

Edited by JohnC
Posted

 

I would trade Kyle Williams for the simple reason that I have so much respect for him. He is the embodiment of class, leadership and work ethic. He deserves better; he deserves to play in a playoff game. If I had my way I would virtually give him up for nothing to allow him to play for playoff caliber team such as Dallas. He, not having the opportunity to play in a post-season after such a long and distinguished career doesn't seem right.

 

As Chuck Wagon smartly posted it is important to have the right mix of players so that the younger players can witness for themselves what it means to be a successful pro. Without that guidance on and off the field their talents won't be fully exploited.

 

Buffalo not having a franchise qb for 20 years and not making the playoffs for 18 years is a disgrace and an embarrassment.

 

 

I can understand that but Kyle is a Bill for life plus he can still flat out play. He stays.

Posted

I wrote a little something on Jalen Robinette, the Air Force WR. He's raw but he's already nuanced in a couple of ways that'll translate.

 

http://billswire.usatoday.com/2017/02/22/bills-2017-nfl-draft-targets-air-force-wr-jalen-robinette-scouting-report/

 

You have to stop stealing my mid-round prospects, Blokes.

 

I like Robinette quite a bit actually. To me, this isn't a very deep WR class, unlike last year when we figured that immediate contributors like R. Anderson and G. Allison would be available late, so I'm hoping it's Davis/Williams in R1 or Kupp/JuJu in R2.

 

Chances are that once we get past R2, guys like J-Rob that have size and a stupid catch radius will get scooped up quickly.

Posted

I think the prime value at receiver is going to be 2nd and 3rd round. I have 2 first rounders (the obvious 2) and then 7 second round grades Ross, Kupp, Zay Jones, Westbrook, Dupree, Schuster and Ford. Then another handful of 3rd rounders.

Posted

I think the prime value at receiver is going to be 2nd and 3rd round. I have 2 first rounders (the obvious 2) and then 7 second round grades Ross, Kupp, Zay Jones, Westbrook, Dupree, Schuster and Ford. Then another handful of 3rd rounders.

I can't get over Cupp's age. He's older than Sammy.
Posted

 

You have to stop stealing my mid-round prospects, Blokes.

 

I like Robinette quite a bit actually. To me, this isn't a very deep WR class, unlike last year when we figured that immediate contributors like R. Anderson and G. Allison would be available late, so I'm hoping it's Davis/Williams in R1 or Kupp/JuJu in R2.

 

Chances are that once we get past R2, guys like J-Rob that have size and a stupid catch radius will get scooped up quickly.

 

A lot of it depends on who returns from the Woods/Goodwin/Hunter bunch and which FA's come in pre-draft. Robinette could be a like-for-like replacement for what Hunter does well.

 

There's a ton of mid-late round slot guys in this class (some big, some small) that I like for the right value. Davis is the clear #1 but, after him, Williams, JuJu and maybe Chris Godwin, not a lot of true boundary guys that I like.

Posted

 

I can understand that but Kyle is a Bill for life plus he can still flat out play. He stays.

He deserves better than dt to be completely attached to this bumbling franchise. I agree with you that he can still play at a high level. It would be nice to see such a class guy have the opportunity to play in a playoff game. It's not happening here and it is not going to happen this year. His career is winding down. He needs to be reprieved.

Posted (edited)

I can't get over Cupp's age. He's older than Sammy.

 

That's the only sticking point I have with him. I still have him graded pretty high (no higher than WR5 on my current list, maybe 6-7 by the end of it) mainly because I think he's about as safe a pick as there is at WR outside of Davis. He's a staggeringly easy evaluation, just depends on what you value.

 

As a high volume slot guy in a WCO, I can justify him in the 2nd. The bigger issues, like with Jarvis Landry, is the volume will demand a lot at 2nd contract but the skill set isn't broad enough to justify that outlay. He's likely only a 4-year rental.

 

Edit - I respect Landry's skill set and all but I ain't paying this for that - http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/miami-dolphins/jarvis-landry-14473/market-value/

Edited by Blokestradamus
Posted (edited)

MY PICKS



10: R1P10


WR COREY DAVIS


WESTERN MICHIGAN


49: R2P17


S OBI MELIFONWU


CONNECTICUT


75: R3P11


LB DUKE RILEY


LSU


112: R4P7


QB DAVIS WEBB


CALIFORNIA


157: R5P12


CB BRENDAN LANGLEY


LAMAR


172: R5P27


C JON TOTH

KENTUCKY



196: R6P11


QB CHAD KELLY

MISSISSIPPI





TRADES


TRADE PARTNER:
WASHINGTON REDSKINS

SENT:
• ROUND: 2 PICK: 12


RECEIVED:
• ROUND: 2 PICK: 17


• ROUND: 4 PICK: 7

Edited by Bocephuz
Posted

 

10: R1P10
LB REUBEN FOSTER
ALABAMA
44: R2P12
S OBI MELIFONWU
CONNECTICUT
75: R3P11
WR ZAY JONES
EAST CAROLINA
157: R5P12
QB DAVIS WEBB
CALIFORNIA
172: R5P27
EDGE DEVONTE FIELDS
LOUISVILLE
196: R6P11
K ZANE GONZALEZ
ARIZONA STATE

 

 

I would sign up for this.

 

Apparently Foster dropped some weight and would be good fit as MLB in McDermott D.. which is key position

 

Obi seems like a versatile safety with size enough to play in the box and fast enough to cover the back end ok

 

Jones looked really good in Senior Bowl.. not sure if he'll last til the 3rd (maybe small school hurts him?) but if he's available here definitely take him

 

For whatever reason Webb has been underrated by most of the pundits. He has prototypical size, strong arm, is aggressive.. does a decent job getting the ball out in time and in rhythm. Decent footwork for big guy who is in shotgun most of time.

 

Not that familiar with Fields as I haven't really looked into any of the DEs or D Linemen much

 

Gonzalez - seems to be the best kicker available in draft. Why not.. Carpenter will be gone. Give him a shot in training camp and if he wins he will be super cheap.

Posted (edited)

Doh

 

@jasoncoleBR

DE/OLB Takkarist McKinley said he'll have shoulder surgery (torn labrum, broken glenoid) after full NFL combine workout. 5-6 month recovery.

 

FWIW, Takkarist McKinley said he did 24 reps benching 230 pounds today despite needing surgery on his right shoulder

Edited by YoloinOhio
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...