BuffaloBillsForever Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 That they planned on paying good money to an elite running back and running him into the ground then cutting ties which is exactly what the contract allows them to do. No it doesn't.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 No it doesn't. Sure it does, when you read it without an agenda...
KD in CA Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 The BIlls are the ones that signed him to that contract...what would that say about them? It says they had an opportunity to get a top back to be their workhorse for a few years and they took it. Do you see Shady in a Bills uniform for another 4 years? I don't.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 It says they had an opportunity to get a top back to be their workhorse for a few years and they took it. Do you see Shady in a Bills uniform for another 4 years? I don't. 4? Probably not. 3, yes.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 I'm just gonna bold that...for hilarity's sake. With Sammy Watkins and Robert Woods BOTH on this team already, this is perhaps the most obtuse statement I've ever seen at Two Bills Drive, including PPP. big word there obtuse. Woods is a bum and lots of people on here think we need a WR. I like this pick but there is more to football than overloading are defense which didn't have any holes except Marrio's departure, which was filled nicely with Lawson, but Ragland struggles in space and if they want to use him to blitz then they should have went with Correa. Also like Washington but we have TWO probowl DTs and a turnstyle at RT and anyone we get now is not likely to help us at any position.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Whaley has gone full retard now. People don't have to agree about talent evaluation or play calling or whatever, but this kind of mindless knee-jerk name calling - what value do you think it adds here? If you know something about the guy and you think it's a bad choice for educated reasons, state what they are Otherwise, why not STFU?
CommonCents Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 (edited) No it doesn't. If they cut him after next year they eat 5 mil in dead money, that's a drop in the bucket. Factor in the ever rising salary cap and it's even less of an impact. The contract looks pretty easy to understand, 3 years of running him into then ground then send him out to pasture. Edited April 30, 2016 by Commonsense
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 The BIlls are the ones that signed him to that contract...what would that say about them? You are either not pregnant or "fully" pregnant. not pregnant on offense, guess we are half pregnant
OCinBuffalo Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 big word there obtuse. Woods is a bum and lots of people on here think we need a WR. I like this pick but there is more to football than overloading are defense which didn't have any holes except Marrio's departure, which was filled nicely with Lawson, but Ragland struggles in space and if they want to use him to blitz then they should have went with Correa. Also like Washington but we have TWO probowl DTs and a turnstyle at RT and anyone we get now is not likely to help us at any position. I haven't seen anybody but you say WR is a need. Moreover, you said what you said: "lack of talent at WR". That is no different than saying: "Please use the word obtuse in a sentence".
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Whaley is not a very good GM. It's not a surprise. THat's a joke, right? I guess you weren't here for the Modrak and Donahoe mess.
BuffaloBillsForever Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 not pregnant on offense, guess we are half pregnant There are lots of holes and concerns on offense and defense. LB, S, CB, WR, TE, OL. This fully pregnant baby is going to be 5.5 pounds!...hint hint
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 I haven't seen anybody but you say WR is a need. Moreover, you said what you said: "lack of talent at WR". That is no different than saying: "Please use the word obtuse in a sentence". you mean the thread on WRs
BuffaloBillsForever Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 THat's a joke, right? I guess you weren't here for the Modrak and Donahoe mess. Whaley is essentially Donahoe.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 There are lots of holes and concerns on offense and defense. LB, S, CB, WR, TE, OL. This fully pregnant baby is going to be 5.5 pounds!...hint hint I'd say LB is fine, could use a CB but not big issue could use a Safety though.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 There are lots of holes and concerns on offense and defense. LB, S, CB, WR, TE, OL. This fully pregnant baby is going to be 5.5 pounds!...hint hint Ragland and Brown elevate the LB corps They obviously feel very comfortable with Blanton at safety -- time will tell They're fine at CB They're fine at TE They just got a good WR prospect and have 9 already on the roster OL is still a concern, expect it to be addressed post June cuts.
jr1 Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 good pick. You never know about McCoy's extracurricular activities and Karlos' concussion history
BuffaloBillsForever Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 I'd say LB is fine, could use a CB but not big issue could use a Safety though. TE is actually a disaster which nobody talks about.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 TE is actually a disaster which nobody talks about. A disaster? Brah... Come on. Now you're just trying to be crazy.
Recommended Posts