Jump to content

bush admits smoking pot


Corp000085

Recommended Posts

sorta admits...  The irony of the whole story is the guy's name is doug wead... 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/02/20/...s.ap/index.html

246433[/snapback]

 

1) So what? I'd wager that's the rule rather than the exception, particularly for that generation.

2) I can at least respect his reasoning (trying to be a proper role model) for dodging any potential questions.

3) Beats a stupid and weasely answer like "I didn't inhale".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorta admits...  The irony of the whole story is the guy's name is doug wead... 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/02/20/...s.ap/index.html

246433[/snapback]

 

I'm a little younger than George, but every single person I knew in college at least tried smoking pot. He remains an honest, noble man, unlike Slick Willie.

 

Names can be great. The top urologist in Toledo (everyone seems to end up at this guys office for a vascectomy)... his name is actually Dr. Richard Tapper. I didn't believe it when I first moved here but it's true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorta admits...  The irony of the whole story is the guy's name is doug wead... 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/02/20/...s.ap/index.html

246433[/snapback]

 

 

Hmm, when I made a similar style thread a few weeks ago and it was promptly deleted and ultimately led to two week vacation. I was told that it was a silly topic and may provoke partisan responses. Wonder what the difference is here. Just curious.

 

Actually I have no probelm with the thread, I think that it is both thoughtful and interesting. My opinion is that there is room for this and many other similar style threads. I just wish that the consistancy that we expect, could actually be realized.

 

Everyone please have a peachy keen day. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, when I made a similar style thread a few weeks ago and it was promptly deleted and ultimately led to two week vacation. I was told that it was a silly topic and may provoke partisan responses. Wonder what the difference is here. Just curious.

 

 

Uh oh - the historically known commentary of rio is starting to creep back into his posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean- "I gotta get more coke for my brother. His nose is like a vaccum cleaner."- Roger Clinton ?

247393[/snapback]

 

 

Do you have a citation for that quote?

 

Otherwise I would think slander is not allowed on this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how national reaction to this story is just completely apathetic. Having an elected official smoke a joint or blow a line when they were younger means nothing to most anyone these days, primarily because the only reason people care is if they're being lied to about it or treated like a gradeschool student (see: I didn't inhale).

 

The president isn't walking in and out of rehab, blown out of his mind like Matthew Perry or Charlie Sheen.

 

He had some fun in college.Same with Clinton. Same with probably 75% of your elected officials. BFD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you think it's a partisan issue?  I highly doubt there's all that many honest men in politics on either side.

 

 

And?

 

Are you suggesting that anyone who has ever snorted a few lines of coke should be disqualified from running for President?

 

 

Actually I wasn't even thinking about the president with my comment - well I lumped him in with the rest I guess. My thought behind the "running america" comment was more about the corporate world - not just the political world.

 

Some drink, some do coke - we all have our vices. Some are morally more acceptable then others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...