Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 326
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Would rather have had Miller. Guess I'll settle for his teammate. At least all of our picks have been from the "Big 3" this year. In Doug I'll have to trust.

Edited by DrDareustein
Posted

I was expecting something along the lines of a NT if/when we went DT, so this is interesting to me...

 

Either way, three positions I wanted early are done, so now BPA for the rest?

Posted

wish we would've went offense. Was this a bigger need than a 2nd legit WR?

 

I have to imagine they have some sort of plan, or are confident in Woody and Hanky as the #2 and #3 for this year. Going WR next year, perhaps?

Posted

This pick just doesn't do it for me. He's a rotational guy and you don't pick for 40 picks after the trade up. Too early for a rotational guy.

Posted (edited)

You don't go for depth in the 3rd. There were a lot of players left on the board. I don't get it

Not for nothing but think of how bad they were without either Kyle or Marcel last year. Depth doesn't hurt but probably could have gotten him in the fourth if they still had the picks.

 

Sticking to the board.

Edited by The Wiz
Posted

 

But thats the thing. His position isnt really a need. :blink:

 

I think Kyle's days are numbered at this point. This makes some sense to me.

Posted (edited)

Rotational DT. Not really excited. He's fine.

 

Some Scouts love him...Some are lukewarm...Still graded out at #43 overall on PFF's big board...His pass rush grade was sky high...He's going to come in on 3rd downs and rush the passer from the 3 tech I imagine... B-)

Edited by KOKBILLS
×
×
  • Create New...