Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 442
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Is this a knock on his athleticism or his Wonderlic? I've been wracking my brain, and the only reason I can surmise that he'd get gassed from chasing his own QB is because he's an idiot.

:lol:

Posted (edited)

 

Waiting to see who the third round pick is

 

:lol: That was my first thought actually!

 

 

Not their top 3 - the three they were debating at 19, right? Guessing Butler.

 

I could be am wrong, the way I took it was saying top 3 overall. It's right near the end of the press conference about Ragland on the Bills site.

 

Just read the Chris Brown article that makes it clear. :beer:

 

 

Aguayo :thumbsup::D

 

:lol::beer:

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Posted (edited)

 

@BuffaloBillsPR

The @buffalobills have now added the ACC Defensive Player of the Year (Shaq Lawson) & the SEC Defensive Player of the Year (Reggie Ragland).

 

The picks sound genius when you say it like that. Whaley is doin his thing.

 

we still can

Dude whats up with jack and jalen?? teams are really not trying to deal with the injury ****. They might go undrafted the way it looks. EDIT: They went to the Cows and jags

 

What, are you a f'n cardiologist? Relax. I'm guessing the FO knows better than you. Figure out a way to root for him, Mr. Know-it-all.

I have a degree in EKG, hell be fine it wont affect his play unless he gains 100lbs of FAT and smokes a lot. a lot a lot.

Edited by Marty McFly
Posted (edited)

Whaley also said their top three guys were Shaq, Ragland -- then he never named the third. Wonder who it was.

 

Well...I'm glad they landed on Shaq there...

 

This talk about loving Ragland at #19 is all fine and dandy now that they got him at #41 (plus two 4th rd picks...)...But if they had taken him at #19 I would have been very disappointed...

 

As I've said here before 100 times I like Ragland...He's a very good football player...But...When you have a player that College teams...I'll say it again...College teams went after and exploited in pass coverage...What exactly do you think Belichick is going to do?...I did not...and still do not believe he was a #19 overall pick...I do however like the pick in the 2nd...It's fine value there because he is going to play a lot...I'm going to be interested to see him at the Will...One thing I do not question with Ragland is his effort on the field...And he definitely is more than a thumper...I'm very interested in Mayock's comments about his weight issues...And I look at this in a positive light...If Ragland gets serious about being a Pro condition-wise it may quick him up a bit...Because when you watch his tape, instincts are not a problem...And when he sees it he looks to bring violent pain...

 

I just want to add how much I absolutely, positively HATE giving up Draft picks to trade up...Right or wrong, and admittedly I'm usually wrong, I hate it and it makes me angry... :lol:

 

I have a degree in EKG, hell be fine it wont affect his play unless he gains 100lbs of FAT and smokes a lot. a lot a lot.

 

Don't give him any ideas... ;)

Edited by KOKBILLS
Posted

 

Cravens is the same speed and 25-30 pounds lighter.

 

Cravens can cover. Speed doesn't = cover skills. When Gronk and Bennett are 6 yrs past Ragland for their 10 catch we're going to regret this.

Posted

Cravens can cover. Speed doesn't = cover skills. When Gronk and Bennett are 6 yrs past Ragland for their 10 catch we're going to regret this.

I would love to say Rex isnt dumb enuff to let Ragland cover Gronk but, after last season.....uh.....I wouldnt be surprised? LOL

I doubt they let Ragland cover Gronk but it is Rex and co so who knows...

Anyway for those that wanna feel better about our 3rd round pick, read up at this link

http://walterfootball.com/scoutingreport2016awashington.php

 

here, here! :beer: :beer:

I agree however, not happy with our Safteys and WRs. If we leave the draft witout a good Saftey and WR im gonna throw some shade at Whaley. Saftey is very important in Rexs scheme and we have no stars at that position.

Posted

Cravens can cover. Speed doesn't = cover skills. When Gronk and Bennett are 6 yrs past Ragland for their 10 catch we're going to regret this.

 

Cravens is 6'1" and 222# and runs a 4.69. Gronk and Bennett would swat him off like a fly and then fly past him. Same for Correa.

Posted

Reggie Ragland Alabama ILB

Buffalo from CHI

  • dm_160331_NFL_Draft_13_Reggie_Ragland.jp watch.png Video Highlights
  • What he brings:The top run-stopping linebacker in this class, Ragland brings size, excellent point-of-attack skills and a strong understanding of geometry with pursuit angles to provide him with sideline-to-sideline range. He also brings a physical element to his game and is an impactful knock-back tackler. While he has some athletic limitations, he has better third-down value than people think, including an underrated pass-rushing presence. He also brings outstanding football character and is one of the more NFL-ready prospects who could step in on day one as a starter. -- Kevin Weidl

     

    How he fits:The 18th-best player on our board and the best player available, Ragland is an excellent value at this point in Round 2. He represents an immediate upgrade over inside linebacker Preston Brown, who struggled last year, and Ragland is a powerful run-stopper who should help improve Buffalo's run defense, which finished 16th in rushing yards allowed per game in 2015. While he's not great in coverage, defensive coordinator Dennis Thurman could use him as a pass-rusher. -- Steve Muench

 

ESPN's Take^^

Posted

I agree however, not happy with our Safteys and WRs. If we leave the draft witout a good Saftey and WR im gonna throw some shade at Whaley. Saftey is very important in Rexs scheme and we have no stars at that position.

 

I think they think Blanton can play the other safety spot opposite Aaron Williams.

Posted

I like the pick, BUT I don't like that we coughed up 2 4th round picks to get him. I'm in the crowd that would have waited to see what fell to us.

 

So you have a problem giving up two fourths for (essentially) a 1st round talent?

 

I think you're using new math or something.

Posted (edited)

Wrong thread for this so this will be my last comment here but Rex took him from promising to the lowest graded LB in the league then mocked him for being timid and dumb. Now they draft a guy in the same position. You don't have to be a psychic. Brown seems like a good dude and I hope he does well wherever he ends up.

 

Except Whaley said Preston Brown will play the MIKE and Ragland will play the WILL.

 

Now, where's that guy who was complaining about trading up to 41 who had Ragland at 19 in his mock draft? ROFL!

Edited by BEAST MODE BABY!
Posted

My initial reaction was to hate the Ragland pick, mainly because we passed up Jarran Reed. Well:

 

http://bills.buffalonews.com/2016/04/29/bong-show-ole-miss-impacts-chad-kelly-bills-three-picks-draft-notes/

 

 

 

Ryan was ecstatic to add Clemson defensive end Shaq Lawson and Ragland to his unit. Buffalo then tried to trade back into the second round to snag Alabama defensive tackle Jarran Reed, tantalizingly still there eight picks after Ragland.

The Bills, however, weren't alone in their desires.

The Seattle Seahawks swooped in with a trade to take Reed 49th overall, the Bills' original pick before trading up to get Ragland.

This makes me feel a little better anyway. At least they tried to get him. If Whaley believes Ragland is that much better than a huge impact NT then I'm on board.

×
×
  • Create New...