akm0404 Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Love how everyone talks about his obvious deficiencies. Defensive player of the year in the best conference, unquestioned defensive leader of the literal National Champion, but yah obv. no good lol.
QCity Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 That's not what I asked you. Do this...list the starting 11 as you see them. 3-4-4 Then add 1-2 DBs depending on your preference. Now, tell me who you are pulling off the field. I don't see this as a concern. Well, nickel would go 3-3-5. You would have 3 LBs on the field. I would guess Hughes and S.Lawson aren't coming off the field with Zach Brown as the Mike. I mean, I thought that's why we got Brown, he's one of the fastest ILBs in the league.
Marty McFly Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 (edited) You should change over to NFL Network. Mayock is far better than anyone over there. I also got the NFL Net on instead of ESPN2, its like a party Edited April 30, 2016 by Marty McFly
Beerball Posted April 30, 2016 Author Posted April 30, 2016 Time for some deep breathing exercises all around. commonsense & Scott Law...the general population understands your takes. No reason to keep coming back for more. Gen pop...your position is well documented. You aren't going to change their opinions and they aren't going to change yours so drop it. So...until pick 80 I don't expect to see any more back & forth. Capisce?
CommonCents Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Time for some deep breathing exercises all around. commonsense & Scott Law...the general population understands your takes. No reason to keep coming back for more. Gen pop...your position is well documented. You aren't going to change their opinions and they aren't going to change yours so drop it. So...until pick 80 I don't expect to see any more back & forth. Capisce? Cheers, thanks.
Big C Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Please take Von Bell in the 3rd!!!!!! No can dosville baby doll.
DrDawkinstein Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Time for some deep breathing exercises all around. commonsense & Scott Law...the general population understands your takes. No reason to keep coming back for more. Gen pop...your position is well documented. You aren't going to change their opinions and they aren't going to change yours so drop it. So...until pick 80 I don't expect to see any more back & forth. Capisce? Thank you, Beersphere
Kirby Jackson Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Love how everyone talks about his obvious deficiencies. Defensive player of the year in the best conference, unquestioned defensive leader of the literal National Champion, but yah obv. no good lol.I wasn't a Ragland guy at 19. I think that he is limited athlete. At the same time I think that he is a long-term, solid starter. That is a win to me at 49.
Nervous Guy Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Time for some deep breathing exercises all around. commonsense & Scott Law...the general population understands your takes. No reason to keep coming back for more. Gen pop...your position is well documented. You aren't going to change their opinions and they aren't going to change yours so drop it. So...until pick 80 I don't expect to see any more back & forth. Capisce? you forgot to call them all "sparky".
Beerball Posted April 30, 2016 Author Posted April 30, 2016 Well, nickel would go 3-3-5. You would have 3 LBs on the field. I would guess Hughes and S.Lawson aren't coming off the field with Zach Brown as the Mike. I mean, I thought that's why we got Brown, he's one of the fastest ILBs in the league. OK. I think they'll be in 6 DBs plenty too, but...if Brown is the 3rd LB then Ragland coming off is not an issue. So, you must believe that the 41st pick is too high for someone who may come off the field often. Do I finally get it?
ndirish1978 Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 We are worse because we have opinions other than "OBD you do nothing wrong!" Sorry for being skeptical about Rex and the team after watching last season. I deleted the post, I was out of line.
Beerball Posted April 30, 2016 Author Posted April 30, 2016 you forgot to call them all "sparky". I forgot to call you Gugny!
yungmack Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 no other team gave up a next year draft pick for trading up so far (in the second round). I didn't like Ragland #19 but I have no problem with him here. Are you Jerry Sullivan, sneaking in here?
John from Riverside Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 In the spirit of common civility and being bills fans.....can I ask the two what way they would have gone now that they have seen how rounds 1 and 2 have played out?
QCity Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 So, you must believe that the 41st pick is too high for someone who may come off the field often. Do I finally get it? That's basically it. I'm not really trashing the pick, I just wasn't that thrilled with it. Anyways, we're on to the 3rd round.
klos63 Posted April 30, 2016 Posted April 30, 2016 Oh boy. This feels like a Rex move -- so obsessed with stopping the run. Not too thrilled about this, but on the bright side our current ILB's are so terrible it's almost guaranteed he starts. yeah, stopping the run is so overrated. Let's go back to giving up 200 yards a game. That worked so well.
Recommended Posts