Trump vs Clinton: Pre Convention matchup

[Deranged Rhino]

HOW GOOD IS TRUMP? HE JUST HAD HILLARY PAY FOR HIS FIRST PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN AD:

 

https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/727948570507288577?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

 

 

Build a wall, deport illegal immigrants, stop schools from being defenseless from terrorists, end federal support of Planned Parenthood, repeal Obamacare, get tough with terrorists overseas — in short, Make America Great Again. Thanks Hillary, for spreading the word!

 

 

 

 

 

It's amazing. The only way she can win is to cheat and run a campaign based on not being Donald Trump.

 

Considering the amount of time she's spent in or near the seat of power, you'd think Hillary would have more arrows in her quiver.

[drinkTHEkoolaid]

 

It's amazing. The only way she can win is to cheat and run a campaign based on not being Donald Trump.

 

Considering the amount of time she's spent in or near the seat of power, you'd think Hillary would have more arrows in her quiver.

She has nothing to run on because she's done nothing. Nothing. Unless you count blaming others, lying, inciting racial and class strife, selling out American interests to the Russians and Chinese, ruining the lives of her husband's sex victims going back to the Arkansas governor days, dodging "sniper fire" in bosnia and jeopardizing the security of the country using her private server to circumvent oversight and the FOIA.

[Deranged Rhino]

She has nothing to run on because she's done nothing. Nothing. Unless you count blaming others, lying, inciting racial and class strife, selling out American interests to the Russians and Chinese, ruining the lives of her husband's sex victims going back to the Arkansas governor days, dodging "sniper fire" in bosnia and jeopardizing the security of the country using her private server to circumvent oversight and the FOIA.

[B-Man]

She has nothing to run on because she's done nothing. Nothing. Unless you count blaming others, lying, inciting racial and class strife, selling out American interests to the Russians and Chinese, ruining the lives of her husband's sex victims going back to the Arkansas governor days, dodging "sniper fire" in bosnia and jeopardizing the security of the country using her private server to circumvent oversight and the FOIA.

 

 

Actually, No. Hillary Clinton Isn’t Better Than Donald Trump

 

FTA:

 

Now that we have destroyed the most qualified and conservative field of GOP presidential candidates in the history of the nation and decided that an unstable Democrat named Donald will be the Republican standard-bearer, some Republicans are claiming that Hillary Clinton is a better choice. This thinking is no less deranged than the thinking that Donald Trump will not be a disaster, no matter if he wins or loses the election.

 

Hillary Clinton’s sole preparation for and only qualification for any office she has held is the fact that she allegedly had sex with Bill Clinton over a period of years. She is an impulsive and vindictive person. She is monumentally unsuited to any enterprise whatsoever. Let’s just look at her record for a moment:

 

Rose Law Firm.

Whitewater.

Hillary-care.

White House travel office.

Illegal use of White House to acquire campaign contributions.

Allowing her grifting brothers access to the federal government to enrich themselves.

Terrorizing Bill Clinton’s harem of former mistresses to keep them quiet and discredit them.

The Clinton Foundation.

Her private email system.

Benghazi.

Any public testimony she has given on any subject.

The destruction of US foreign policy and alliances

 

 

 

Where Donald Trump’s business career is an uninterrupted series of failures, the exact same critique applies to Hillary Clinton’s record each and every time she was allowed to actually exert personal authority over anything. In fact, Hillary Clinton’s failure as Secretary of State is the direct causation for the rise of ISIS, the civil war in Syria, and the refugee crisis hitting Europe.

 

 

This is not even a question of choosing a “lesser of two evils.”

 

Trump may be unable to dissociate fact from fiction, Hillary Clinton thinks they are the same thing. Saying that Hillary Clinton is better than Donald Trump is just as stupid as saying that Donald Trump is qualified to be president.

 

He isn’t. She isn’t.

 

 

 

Paul Ryan is creating a best, safe non-answer for other Republicans -- Trump has to prove he's worthy of my endorsement -- smart

 

 

 

.

Edited May 5, 2016 by B-Man

[3rdnlng]

Actually, No. Hillary Clinton Isn’t Better Than Donald Trump

 

FTA:

 

Now that we have destroyed the most qualified and conservative field of GOP presidential candidates in the history of the nation and decided that an unstable Democrat named Donald will be the Republican standard-bearer, some Republicans are claiming that Hillary Clinton is a better choice. This thinking is no less deranged than the thinking that Donald Trump will not be a disaster, no matter if he wins or loses the election.

 

Hillary Clinton’s sole preparation for and only qualification for any office she has held is the fact that she allegedly had sex with Bill Clinton over a period of years. She is an impulsive and vindictive person. She is monumentally unsuited to any enterprise whatsoever. Let’s just look at her record for a moment:

 

Rose Law Firm.

Whitewater.

Hillary-care.

White House travel office.

Illegal use of White House to acquire campaign contributions.

Allowing her grifting brothers access to the federal government to enrich themselves.

Terrorizing Bill Clinton’s harem of former mistresses to keep them quiet and discredit them.

The Clinton Foundation.

Her private email system.

Benghazi.

Any public testimony she has given on any subject.

The destruction of US foreign policy and alliances

 

 

 

Where Donald Trump’s business career is an uninterrupted series of failures, the exact same critique applies to Hillary Clinton’s record each and every time she was allowed to actually exert personal authority over anything. In fact, Hillary Clinton’s failure as Secretary of State is the direct causation for the rise of ISIS, the civil war in Syria, and the refugee crisis hitting Europe.

 

 

This is not even a question of choosing a “lesser of two evils.”

 

Trump may be unable to dissociate fact from fiction, Hillary Clinton thinks they are the same thing. Saying that Hillary Clinton is better than Donald Trump is just as stupid as saying that Donald Trump is qualified to be president.

 

He isn’t. She isn’t.

Two things: Trump hasn't had a business career of uninterrupted failures and you forgot Hillary's little Watergate incident.

[B-Man]

What an incredibly dumb time to be alive.

[Deranged Rhino]

What an incredibly dumb time to be alive.

 

You got that right.

[dpberr]

The way I see it is that nothing will get done in a Clinton presidency. The inactivity will make the Obama years look like the golden age of accomplishment. Republicans have a deep seated hatred AND mistrust of her that isn't going away.

 

With a Trump presidency, there's the chance that something can be accomplished. He's not beholden to the ultra right wingers (who enjoy litigating decades old topics like abortion and down with the homosexuals!) or the ultra left liberals (who believe everything should be free, and yes, of course you're oppressed and we should feel guilty about it).

 

Sure people don't like him or find him arrogant or repugnant but Trump is not chained to things like Whitewater, Clinton impeachment, Benghazi, email servers, etc.

 

Of the two people, IMO, he's the better shot at getting things done via compromise. Now, if you belong to camps that believe that there should never be compromise on anything ever, you'll disagree.

[IDBillzFan]

 

Hillary Clinton Orders Liberal Media to Get Tough on Trump (VIDEO)

 

The scandal-plagued Democrat wants liberal reporters to get hard on Trump–

 

Question number 1 for Trump: Do you think Hillary had Vince Foster killed?

 

Go ahead. Ask him. I'll get the popcorn ready.

[Deranged Rhino]

The way I see it is that nothing will get done in a Clinton presidency. The inactivity will make the Obama years look like the golden age of accomplishment. Republicans have a deep seated hatred AND mistrust of her that isn't going away.

 

With a Trump presidency, there's the chance that something can be accomplished. He's not beholden to the ultra right wingers (who enjoy litigating decades old topics like abortion and down with the homosexuals!) or the ultra left liberals (who believe everything should be free, and yes, of course you're oppressed and we should feel guilty about it).

 

Sure people don't like him or find him arrogant or repugnant but Trump is not chained to things like Whitewater, Clinton impeachment, Benghazi, email servers, etc.

 

Of the two people, IMO, he's the better shot at getting things done via compromise. Now, if you belong to camps that believe that there should never be compromise on anything ever, you'll disagree.

 

I think you're massively underestimating Clinton's competence and ability to work within the system. She'll get plenty done. Including getting us involved in one, if not two, new theaters of conflict.

[Tiberius]

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/03/2016-electorate-will-be-the-most-diverse-in-u-s-history/

 

 

Most diverse electorate in history. This is what's going on. A privileged class is seeing their electoral advantage slowly shrinking and, being the rubes they are, are blaiming the politicians. No matter what Mitch McConnell does he can't change the election math, try as they might with ID cards, gerrymandering and other anti democratic efforts. Donald Trump is the great white hope.

[Deranged Rhino]

[Magox]

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/03/2016-electorate-will-be-the-most-diverse-in-u-s-history/

 

 

No matter what Mitch McConnell does he can't change the election math, try as they might with ID cards, gerrymandering and other anti democratic efforts.

 

Requiring an ID to vote should be mandatory, because it's the right thing to do.

 

Gerrymandering districts is something that isn't specially akin to just one party.

[meazza]

 

Requiring an ID to vote should be mandatory, because it's the right thing to do.

 

Gerrymandering districts is something that isn't specially akin to just one party.

 

Funny, in Canada and Quebec which is considered way to the left, we require ID cards to vote. I don't get why this was never in place from the beginning.

[drinkTHEkoolaid]

 

Funny, in Canada and Quebec which is considered way to the left, we require ID cards to vote. I don't get why this was never in place from the beginning.

Stop with your common sense already.

[Joe Miner]

 

Funny, in Canada and Quebec which is considered way to the left, we require ID cards to vote. I don't get why this was never in place from the beginning.

Don't try peddling your Canerdian ways around here. We're not buying that carp.

[DC Tom]

 

Funny, in Canada and Quebec which is considered way to the left, we require ID cards to vote. I don't get why this was never in place from the beginning.

 

Everyone knows that Canada is a utopian society that progressive Americans believe we should strive for, so there's NO way you'd have something as racist as voter ID. That's a complete lie, and you know it.

[/dev/null]

Your Asshat meme was better

[Deranged Rhino]

Your Asshat meme was better

 

Variety is the spice of life... But I also kinda agree.

[meazza]

 

Everyone knows that Canada is a utopian society that progressive Americans believe we should strive for, so there's NO way you'd have something as racist as voter ID. That's a complete lie, and you know it.

Depends. For example, God is punishing albertans by burning down fort mcmurray for their right wing views.