Jump to content

Trump vs Clinton: Pre Convention matchup


  

49 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you vote for in the General Election?

    • Clinton
      20
    • Trump
      29


Recommended Posts

How can I argue such subjective topics with you?

 

You can argue that LBJ was successful, hell, VERY successful, on the domestic front and terrible, like Mr. Executive experience Bush, on the foreign front. And look where executive experience got Nixon...

 

You can also argue that LBJ, as Vice President, had executive experience.

 

And you can only argue subjective interpretation, you idiot. Nobody in their right mind argues objective fact. :wallbash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 408
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/732575682367258624

 

Lol @ "the energizer". Gotta luv trump working that in there. That's the nickname given the 50 year old blonde divorcee by the security who let her in to Clintons house. Does anyone seriously doubt he's banging her?

And Trump wants to punish women that get abortions

 

 

So glad the Trump supporters are not hiding :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NYT headline reveals the sad reality for Hillary: Did she even win Kentucky?

"Bernie Sanders Wins Oregon; Hillary Clinton Declares Victory in Kentucky."

 

Mrs. Clinton raced around Kentucky in the two days before the primary, hoping to fend off Mr. Sanders in a state that she won easily in 2008. In unofficial results late Tuesday night, Mrs. Clinton edged Mr. Sanders by about 1,900 votes, or less than half a percentage point, with all counties reporting. The Associated Press had not declared a winner by midnight.



The close result meant that she and Mr. Sanders would effectively split the state’s delegates. Nonetheless, winning Kentucky would give her a symbolic triumph that could blunt the effect of her loss in Oregon as she turns her attention to Donald J. Trump, her likely general election opponent.

 

 

 

What is the "symbolic triumph" of winning by virtually nothing?

 

 

It has been about 1 year since Bernie Sanders announced his candidacy and only about 6 months since the first Democratic debate where people could see and hear what Bernie Sanders was all about. Prior to that, most of America had never heard of him.

Apart from that very few of his policies have been presented in a positive way by the mainstream media and he has had to do his best to get noticed against Hillary Clinton's massive awareness level among Americans, huge infrastructure (including the DNC itself) and previous experience as a Presidential Candidate.

Despite ALL THIS and so much more, Bernie has won over 20 States so far and less than 300 pledged Delegates behind Clinton with over 900 to go.

Mrs. Clinton is a very weak candidate. VERY WEAK.

Any way you look at it, Sanders has come from NOTHING to become the most successful outside candidate in History.

Whilst it says so much about and for those behind Sanders, it says very little about Clinton and the level of support she should have got but has not.

She will probably win the Candidacy but frankly, her result is by no means anything to be proud off and to even get where she has, involved her following Sanders lead on Policy and NOT here own.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New polls put Trump ahead of Clinton

 

Donald Trump has pulled ahead of Hillary Clinton in the battle between the two likely presidential nominees, two new polls revealed.

 

The real estate tycoon led the former secretary of state, 42 percent to 37 percent, a Rasmussen poll showed on Thursday.

 

The 5-point Rasmussen lead enjoyed by Trump is up from the 41-39 percent edge he held in the groups poll done earlier this month.

 

http://nypost.com/2016/05/19/another-poll-puts-trump-ahead-of-clinton/

Edited by truth on hold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From that same Fox News poll, Johnson is at 10%.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/18/fox-news-poll-trump-tops-clinton-both-seen-as-deeply-flawed-candidates.html

 

And from Rasmussen's poll:

http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch

"But Rasmussen Reports latest national telephone survey finds that 13% prefer some other candidate..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From that same Fox News poll, Johnson is at 10%.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/18/fox-news-poll-trump-tops-clinton-both-seen-as-deeply-flawed-candidates.html

 

And from Rasmussen's poll:

http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch

"But Rasmussen Reports latest national telephone survey finds that 13% prefer some other candidate..."

If Johnson gets 5% it's a major game changer for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She took foreign money to help people? So your problem is that the money won't work as well or something? :lol:

She's corrupt as all he'll you nitwit.

 

Put your overlord's standard operating procedure flowchart on responding to Hillary criticism down, and for the first time in your life have an independent thought. She is as corrupt as corrupt can be. If that's cool with you then I guess that you've made peace with whoring out whatever your principles are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She's corrupt as all he'll you nitwit.

 

Put your overlord's standard operating procedure flowchart on responding to Hillary criticism down, and for the first time in your life have an independent thought. She is as corrupt as corrupt can be. If that's cool with you then I guess that you've made peace with whoring out whatever your principles are.

Lol, ya, ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She took foreign money to help people? So your problem is that the money won't work as well or something? :lol:

She took foreign money to help herself, you fool. In 2013 she had some 90 million donated to her foundation. Something like 8.8 million went to charity. The rest was to pay her political "help". The same year the Koch Foundation donated about the same as Hillary took in. Their administrative costs were less than 500k. She's a crook through and through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Johnson gets 5% it's a major game changer for years to come.

I disagree

 

It's going to be a tough job following President Potemkin. When Obama's out of office and the facade starts coming down, whoever is left holding the bag is going to be so re soundly despised in four years that nobody will pay any attention to 3rd parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...