BillsVet Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 They're going to have to reduce the playbook...chances are 1 perhaps 2 rookies will be playing on the defensive front 7. That, and newcomers like Zach Brown and Robert Blanton will be getting minutes. Maybe Buddy watched the 1985 Chicago Bears 30 for 30 and realized his dad once had to do it.
ddaryl Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 every HC we have had for the last 17 years has come out and said were going to simply this or that. Those coaches were all fired soon afterwards
Jauronimo Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Dumb it down for these mental giants. This game gets more complex as players get dumber. How does someone make it all the way through college and be unable to perform their job? Last time I checked, no boss I have ever had dumbed down jobs to appease the morons in the office. Probably because the process has already reached such a minimal threshold that automation is the next step.
Dorkington Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 I'm a fan of starting simple, and then applying more complicated schemes once the base of the defense becomes natural, so that players aren't actively overthinking it.
boater Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Dumb it down for these mental giants. This game gets more complex as players get dumber. How does someone make it all the way through college and be unable to perform their job? Last time I checked, no boss I have ever had dumbed down jobs to appease the morons in the office. I worked in HR and also did a stint in training. Parallel to your bolded points: life is getting more complex, as the deeply flawed US educational system gives us millennials unprepared for work. I've dumbed down jobs to get recruits/employees likely to succeed. An aside, I see a theme in this thread that hints at a difference in reaction time versus intelligence. Simplifying the D may be less for intellect, and may be more for the brains to process it timely.
hondo in seattle Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Coming from a manufacturing background this was the bulk of what we did as manufacturing and process engineers. When I went to the army's Officer Candidate School, all but one of the candidates in my class were college grads. Some came from prestigious universities. So we laughed when an instructor told us that all training materials for enlisted soldiers were written at the 10th grade level. Then he told us that all officer training materials were written at the 12th grade level and that humbled us. He explained that to be effective, training has to make sense to everyone, not just to the best and brightest. Clarity for everyone is key. Even the least analytical player with the poorest memory needs to understand the scheme and know his assignment for each call.
DukeyBomb Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 As a former player and coach I can tell you this The more you require a player to "think" on a field the more it takes away from reactionary time, communication, and players start cheating on their basic fundamentals...... There is a reason why 2 tenths of a second is made a big deal of at the NFL level......because its the difference between winning and losing on a a play Now.....I dont necessarily think that Rex Ryan's past schemes are wrong....only that I thought it might take some time for the players to become adjusted to them......and for Rex to become adjusted to his players fingers crossed This!
BarleyNY Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 When I went to the army's Officer Candidate School, all but one of the candidates in my class were college grads. Some came from prestigious universities. So we laughed when an instructor told us that all training materials for enlisted soldiers were written at the 10th grade level. Then he told us that all officer training materials were written at the 12th grade level and that humbled us. He explained that to be effective, training has to make sense to everyone, not just to the best and brightest. Clarity for everyone is key. Even the least analytical player with the poorest memory needs to understand the scheme and know his assignment for each call. Great lesson.
Direhard Fan Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Just seems odd that we talk all the time about how smart this guy is and that guy is, but can't understand a "D" because it's too hard to learn. After all the time they have to learn it? Odd. Guess N.E. dunbed down their game a long time ago. If they can't understand the play book they should hire a tutor with the big bucks they make.
CardinalScotts Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Rex has been coordinating defenses for 15 years with overall a big degree of success. Now he needs to simplify it ? why? This isn't on Rex just like last year isn't on Rex.
Saxum Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 (edited) Mario Williams was quoted as saying "So now he decides to simplify things? %#@!" Yes and the dimpliest thing was to get rid of player who did not want to pay attention. How do you think these guys make it through college? Do you think they actually attend class? Does this mean the D won't be any good because we no longer have a "complex scheme"? Sure they do; Lawson has industrial engineering degree. Oops he is one of the players who actually GOT the scheme. Not coincidentally Mario Williams never graduated from NC, same school Lawson got degree from. I think PART of the reason why some coaches were dismissed because they were not communicating well with players changes they needed to make as part of scheme, something in past which Rex has used players from previous teams to do. This showed a weakness in coaching staff last year. Wish Rex realized it earlier before he let go some of the good coaches Bills had on defense. Looked like Ryan simplified things after the bye last season. Maybe not in terms of terminology, but certainly in terms of assignments and responsibilities. It helped Brown, too, that Lawson took over the field calls. It will be interesting to see how Brown reacts when he resumes defensive QB duties for the front seven. GO BILLS!!! It really surprised me that Brown "could not get it" being a coach's son. I do not believe he got his degree from Louisville either. Edited April 21, 2016 by Koolaid
BringBackFergy Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Thanks for posting - I missed this too. I get how Rex would be conflicted. If I was a HC or coordinator, I'd want to out-scheme and out-smart my opponents. I could see myself falling into the trap of making things too complicated. But a lot of these players were not A students in college. And you want your D to make quick decisions and then act with aggression. Simple schemes executed with a high degree of violence and precision can be better than complicated schemes executed with self-doubt and confusion. The optimal balancing point between brilliant complexity and aggressive simplicity is tough to find. And it will vary from team to team, season to season, depending on the players. Rex has clearly reevaluated his defensive roster and is moving toward the simpler end of the continuum. Based on some of the things we've heard from the players and saw on the field last year, this is probably a wise move. Nice analysis
YoloinOhio Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 (edited) Yes and the dimpliest thing was to get rid of player who did not want to pay attention. Sure they do; Lawson has industrial engineering degree. Oops he is one of the players who actually GOT the scheme. Not coincidentally Mario Williams never graduated from NC, same school Lawson got degree from. I think PART of the reason why some coaches were dismissed because they were not communicating well with players changes they needed to make as part of scheme, something in past which Rex has used players from previous teams to do. This showed a weakness in coaching staff last year. Wish Rex realized it earlier before he let go some of the good coaches Bills had on defense. It really surprised me that Brown "could not get it" being a coach's son. I do not believe he got his degree from Louisville either. When I listened to the interview on Tuesday night, I didn't get the impression that Brown felt it was a difficult defense to learn in terms of intelligence. He said the confusing part was the number of checks on each play, and that was the part that he said was significantly reduced based on what they've seen thus far this week in meetings. He also said it is his understanding that the calls will be coming in sooner and whatever the issue was last year has been fixed. And still didn't seem to know who it was sending in the def. calls. Edited April 21, 2016 by YoloinOhio
BobbyC81 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 I'm a fan of starting simple, and then applying more complicated schemes once the base of the defense becomes natural, so that players aren't actively overthinking it. I agree, unlike when Marrone and company decided to run an up-tempo offense with a rookie QB in Manuel. Of course, EJ didn't have the time to think.
Dopey Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Sounds good to me. Now...about Marcel and Kyle dropping into coverage, can we simplify that too? You know, let them attack the oline instead of trying to cover someone or an area they have no business doing? Thanks Rex.
3rdand12 Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Bosses and companies try to simplify things for their staff and employees all the time. Isn't that what management is all about, keeping things simple and efficient? Manufacturing Engineers do that. Bosses try to squeeze as much productivity out of an employee as possible without mistakes or injury. Coming from a manufacturing background this was the bulk of what we did as manufacturing and process engineers. I just caught this post. soory i posted as I caught up!! exactly correct. I have plenty of manufacturing within my resume to attest , that you are quite correct . When I went to the army's Officer Candidate School, all but one of the candidates in my class were college grads. Some came from prestigious universities. So we laughed when an instructor told us that all training materials for enlisted soldiers were written at the 10th grade level. Then he told us that all officer training materials were written at the 12th grade level and that humbled us. He explained that to be effective, training has to make sense to everyone, not just to the best and brightest. Clarity for everyone is key. Even the least analytical player with the poorest memory needs to understand the scheme and know his assignment for each call. and this is why the Army gets s++t done. seriously.
Saxum Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 Sounds good to me. Now...about Marcel and Kyle dropping into coverage, can we simplify that too? You know, let them attack the oline instead of trying to cover someone or an area they have no business doing? Thanks Rex. That would be .... dopey. The best defenses had players drop in zone defenses; Both Denver's and Texans' defense did that with success but it helps when players are WILLING to do it not complain and barely make effort when they are called to do it. Never heard Kyle complaining about it.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted April 21, 2016 Posted April 21, 2016 As a former player and coach I can tell you this The more you require a player to "think" on a field the more it takes away from reactionary time, communication, and players start cheating on their basic fundamentals...... "Don't think, you'll only hurt the team" -Bull Durham Dumb it down for these mental giants. This game gets more complex as players get dumber. How does someone make it all the way through college and be unable to perform their job? Last time I checked, no boss I have ever had dumbed down jobs to appease the morons in the office. A person can have plenty of smarts, and if they're asked to process too much information, still not be able to process it fast enough to keep up with an equally talented athlete who's just getting after it.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted April 22, 2016 Posted April 22, 2016 When I went to the army's Officer Candidate School, all but one of the candidates in my class were college grads. Some came from prestigious universities. So we laughed when an instructor told us that all training materials for enlisted soldiers were written at the 10th grade level. Then he told us that all officer training materials were written at the 12th grade level and that humbled us. He explained that to be effective, training has to make sense to everyone, not just to the best and brightest. Clarity for everyone is key. Even the least analytical player with the poorest memory needs to understand the scheme and know his assignment for each call. I took an optional ROTC course in college. The acronym instructions on how to clean your m16 or some of the other task were nothing short of brilliant. Simple, concise, clear and easy to remember. I was even more impressed when they walked us through how to report situations. That's why military people tend to be good at running things. They know communication
Recommended Posts