DC Tom Posted April 14, 2016 Author Posted April 14, 2016 Yup, I have my suspicions also, but never cared enough to complain I've been looking for the rules of debate here and can't find them. Do you inquisitors have access to rules that define "derailing a thread"? Sounds to me like you clods came up with BS and all passed it around the circle jerk and agreed it was a legitimate charge. I'd love to hear what it is exactly so I can point out all the times the Inquisitors do it. Which I'm sure is quit often The first rule is to actually debate, which you do not do.
Tiberius Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 The first rule is to actually debate, which you do not do. As opposed to just calling someone an idiot? Sorry, I didn't include your trade mark for "idiot" Glass houses
birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 Glass houses? Are you accusing me of duplicitously using multiple accounts, or of not knowing how to spell "stimulus?" not accusing, hypothesizing. in your case it would likely be multiplicitous.. I can neither confirm nor refute, however,
DC Tom Posted April 14, 2016 Author Posted April 14, 2016 not accusing, hypothesizing. No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney. in your case it would likely be multiplicitous.. I can neither confirm nor refute, however, I'll confirm for you: no. Never mind that I don't need to...how could I? Where would I find the time? As opposed to just calling someone an idiot? Sorry, I didn't include your trade mark for "idiot" Glass houses Yeah, that's your perspective, because I don't debate with you. Because YOU DON'T DEBATE. You really don't understand the point everyone's trying to make, including several people who don't want you banned: you post nothing of substance. There is no debating with you. Discussion with you is useless.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 This thread is highly entertaining. Two of the biggest hypocrites on the board teaming up to call everyone else hypocrites is the height of unintentional irony.
3rdnlng Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 Thank you for proving its a BS issue then. Me posting in a basically dead thread didn't derail anything Nice attempt at trying to change the narrative, but you are not being accused of trying to derail just one specific thread. Every thread you post in, you in one way or another, try to derail it. You lower the level of discussion. You don't contribute to this forum, but make it less than what it should be. I voted "yes" to your banning, not because you are a liberal or because you are a dumb schit. I voted the way I did because this board would be better without you.
meazza Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 This thread is highly entertaining. Two of the biggest hypocrites on the board teaming up to call everyone else hypocrites is the height of unintentional irony. Amazing isn't it. And what's more amazing is the speed in which I logout and log back in as Deranged Rhino.
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 This thread is highly entertaining. Two of the biggest hypocrites on the board teaming up to call everyone else hypocrites is the height of unintentional irony. No. This is the height of unintentional irony: Hyphenated Non-hyphenated
Azalin Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 No, they're not. He creates a new account every time he gets banned from PPP. Yep, I was just looking through the archives, and so far Dave In Norfolk and Molson Golden 2002 for sure. Which kinda begs the question, is it worth trying to ban him if he's just going to create a new alias and continue this nonsense? We should all just agree to ignore him.
meazza Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 Yep, I was just looking through the archives, and so far Dave In Norfolk and Molson Golden 2002 for sure. Which kinda begs the question, is it worth trying to ban him if he's just going to create a new alias and continue this nonsense? We should all just agree to ignore him. It's hard to ignore. Like a car crash with an oil tanker.
DC Tom Posted April 14, 2016 Author Posted April 14, 2016 Yep, I was just looking through the archives, and so far Dave In Norfolk and Molson Golden 2002 for sure. Which kinda begs the question, is it worth trying to ban him if he's just going to create a new alias and continue this nonsense? We should all just agree to ignore him. I always liked Dave in Norfolk. "DIN" was an appropriate moniker for him.
birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) Amazing isn't it. And what's more amazing is the speed in which I logout and log back in as Deranged Rhino. well, he was clearly named something else before his current name. what compels someone to do that? I've always been and will remain birddog. I like bird dog's. they're hard working, smart , loyal and sincere. they generally run with people of similar character. rhinos, not so much... Edited April 14, 2016 by birdog1960
DC Tom Posted April 14, 2016 Author Posted April 14, 2016 well, he was clearly named something else before his current name. what compels someone to do that? I've always been and will remain birddog. I like bird dog's. they're hard working, smart , loyal and sincere. they generally run with people of similar character. rhinos, not so much... You can change your screen name on your account name once every six months, you know. You can also go in to people's profiles and check their name history. Most of the people here have kept the same screen name on their account since they started. The few who haven't have also never tried to hide who they are.
birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 You can change your screen name on your account name once every six months, you know. You can also go in to people's profiles and check their name history. Most of the people here have kept the same screen name on their account since they started. The few who haven't have also never tried to hide who they are. not bothered to go to those lengths. now if there were a way to check on multiple screen names i'd do it.
meazza Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 well, he was clearly named something else before his current name. what compels someone to do that? I've always been and will remain birddog. I like bird dog's. they're hard working, smart , loyal and sincere. they generally run with people of similar character. rhinos, not so much... It's quite obvious who DR is since we basically all refer to him as "Greg". I once changed my name from Meazza1981 to Meazza because I'm ashamed of how old I am.
birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 It's quite obvious who DR is since we basically all refer to him as "Greg". I once changed my name from Meazza1981 to Meazza because I'm ashamed of how old I am. so how is changing from connor to gator any different?
meazza Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) so how is changing from connor to gator any different? Because I didn't deny that I changed my nickname, he does. Edited April 14, 2016 by meazza
birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 Because I didn't deny that I changed my nickname, he does. slight variation in degrees of deception. As I said, the most deceptive act is posting under multiple screen names. you say you know but won't out those doing that. that's as or more deceptive than posting as connor and later gator.
Azalin Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 slight variation in degrees of deception. As I said, the most deceptive act is posting under multiple screen names. you say you know but won't out those doing that. that's as or more deceptive than posting as connor and later gator. I've got one I can cop to - way back before PPP was around, before TSW went to Rivals (anyone remember that fiasco?) I used to post on TSW as 'The Council'. I stopped doing that because thinking and speaking in terms of a plurality became a pain, so I phased out The Council and phased in Azalin, the name I've always used in forums from the beginning.
Recommended Posts