thebandit27 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 No idea what to make of this rumor, other than it would make no sense unless the plan is to draft a QB As to that, this year's QBs remind me so much of 2008... Goff is the Matt Ryan Wentz is the Joe Flacco
26CornerBlitz Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 No idea what to make of this rumor, other than it would make no sense unless the plan is to draft a QB As to that, this year's QBs remind me so much of 2008... Goff is the Matt Ryan Wentz is the Joe Flacco Maybe so in time, but 2016 NFL readiness is the problem. With the Bills dreams of postseason it does not add up.
aristocrat Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 No idea what to make of this rumor, other than it would make no sense unless the plan is to draft a QB As to that, this year's QBs remind me so much of 2008... Goff is the Matt Ryan Wentz is the Joe Flacco i'd take either one of those guys.
3rdand12 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 i'd take either one of those guys. Yes , in hindsight i too would take Ryan or Flacco
Kirby Jackson Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 Yes , in hindsight i too would take Ryan or FlaccoThe way to view it though is would you trade Tyrod, a 1st, a 2nd and next year's 3rd for rookie year Flacco or Ryan? That's what this ridiculous rumor would be.
3rdand12 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 The way to view it though is would you trade Tyrod, a 1st, a 2nd and next year's 3rd for rookie year Flacco or Ryan? That's what this ridiculous rumor would be. I cannot participate in such prattle Kirby. I was just having a chuckle. with Mr Fancy pants
Agent 91 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 The way to view it though is would you trade Tyrod, a 1st, a 2nd and next year's 3rd for rookie year Flacco or Ryan? That's what this ridiculous rumor would be. i think a safer phrase would be swap firsts... lol
Kirby Jackson Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 I cannot participate in such prattle Kirby. I was just having a chuckle. with Mr Fancy pants It really is just insanity!! I actually think it's a good deal for Cleveland and Denver and a terrible deal for the Bills. Probably some Denver fan trying to find a QB.
4merper4mer Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 Defense is too screwed up to give up picks. Otherwise I'd be all for that trade. Thanks Rex Rex took a statue of a swiss army knife and molded it into a fully pregnant block of clay which will now be molded back into a statue but some of the clay is missing and will need to be replaced with newer but cheaper clay. The new statue will be of a hammer so we had better hope every other team has a nail for an offense. It is not a normal hammer though. It is one that comes with a 427 page instruction manual. With all of the things Rex has already broken and will likely continue to break, a first look would say they will need to keep all the picks. I think the possibility is remote, but it is possible that Whaley and Pegula realize Rex is a disaster that needs to be given one more year. Why not build for the future when you realize there are no viable options in the present? It could be the second management team in three years that realized it had to find a way to give Rex a push out the door. As soon as Rex was gone the Jets won 10 games with Fitz. Personally I don't like the QBs in this draft but someone will be better than Fitz.
Kirby Jackson Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 i think a safer phrase would be swap firsts... lolWell, they'd have the 1st to use elsewhere. They either have Tyrod, a 1, a 2 and next year's 3 or Wentz / Goff. They would definitely be using it on one of those 2.
jahnyc Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 If the Bills would really do this (which I doubt), one potential positive would be having a low cost starting QB for at least some period of time (assuming that the QB drafted was ready to play in his first or second year as a Bill).
CNY315 Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 https://twitter.com/AllbrightNFL/status/720402751818084353 Benjamin Allbright @AllbrightNFLThis #Broncos #Browns #Bills three way trade rumor has been denied by all three teams, and is the product of one unknown blog. 0 retweets1 like
GG Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 Bills essentially have TT locked up through '17(counting franchise tag) This trade doesn't work for Bills.
KOKBILLS Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) It really is just insanity!! I actually think it's a good deal for Cleveland and Denver and a terrible deal for the Bills. Probably some Denver fan trying to find a QB. It is awful...My cousin sent the rumor to me earlier today and my response was basically...That would seriously piss me off...And I'm far from the biggest TT fan...Though I like the kid...But #19, #49, a 3rd next year AND TT...to move up 17 spots?...No thanks... On a side note I think it says a lot about what it's like to be a Bills Fan...at least what it's like for me as a Bills Fan of 45 some odd years now... when you read a rumor you're 99.9% sure is bull crap, but you're pissed because the fake trade make the Bills look stupid... Edited April 14, 2016 by KOKBILLS
Deranged Rhino Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 https://twitter.com/AllbrightNFL/status/720402751818084353 Benjamin Allbright @AllbrightNFLThis #Broncos #Browns #Bills three way trade rumor has been denied by all three teams, and is the product of one unknown blog. 0 retweets1 like Huh. Who saw that coming...
purple haze Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) We saw last year that the Bills have no problem cutting their late round draft picks. To that point, that may support trading those later round picks for a guy they feel confident would make the team in the mid rounds They cut a couple that wound up back on the practice squad a couple days later. They seem to keep their draft picks around one way or another. I would love to see them trade down and get an extra second rounder. If they traded up into the top 10, which I doubt, but if they did, I wouldn't be expecting QB. I would expect Myles Jack. And it would be him haven fallen to nine or ten so it wouldn't cost as much to go get him. I could also see them trading up a few spots to get Shaq Lawson. Instinct tells me the QB's they really like are in rounds 2-3. They are players with the same developmental time needed as the Goff's and Wentz's and Lynch's without the premium cost. The NFL makes everything fascinating and the draft is near the top of the list. It really is just insanity!! I actually think it's a good deal for Cleveland and Denver and a terrible deal for the Bills. Probably some Denver fan trying to find a QB. Deal is straight gahbage for the Bills. Whaley is a gambler, but he ain't stupid. This trade would be stupid. Unless they got a starting player also in the deal too, like Emanuel Sanders or Joe Thomas and a pick back as well. This trade ain't happening anyway, so... Edited April 14, 2016 by purple haze
DirtDart Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 @ChrisTrapasso B/c the benefits of trading down in the draft are as vast as the risks of trading up, Im kinda surprised teams are still willing to trade up Every pick is a risk, we have seen many #1s bust.
YoloinOhio Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 https://twitter.com/AllbrightNFL/status/720402751818084353 Benjamin Allbright @AllbrightNFL This #Broncos #Browns #Bills three way trade rumor has been denied by all three teams, and is the product of one unknown blog. 0 retweets1 like you don't say! 2 more weeks ...
Coach Tuesday Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 The trade I would do: Buffalo trades Tyrod and #19 to Denver for Sanders and Denver's 32nd and 63rd picks. Buffalo trades Denver's 32nd and 63rd picks and next year's #1 to Cleveland for the #2 pick. Buffalo takes Goff.
ALF Posted April 14, 2016 Posted April 14, 2016 Speculation Philly will try to move from 8 to 1 or 2 for a QB. Browns might still get Lynch moving down but risky with teams needing a QB.
Recommended Posts