3rdand12 Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 That's pretty much what I'm getting at. I obviously don't want them to reach, but if a QB prospect they believe in is there, I really hope they select him. I like Tyrod, but you gotta pull the trigger when you have the opportunity. I cannot argue. At least this year coming you can take time to develop one properly. I hope !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpberr Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Question is which do you run if you're the Bills? A 3-3-5 alignment or a 4-2-5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Question is which do you run if you're the Bills? A 3-3-5 alignment or a 4-2-5? we either need a box safety or a shut down nose tackle. I think its easier to get a box safety than a solid nose tackle. And if I want a box safety I offer low money to whitner and play him 12-15% of the snaps - run downs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 we either need a box safety or a shut down nose tackle. I think its easier to get a box safety than a solid nose tackle. And if I want a box safety I offer low money to whitner and play him 12-15% of the snaps - run downs. I think Blanton might be the box safety. What I've heard on him is that he can lay the lumber but isn't much help in coverage. With the cash they have on him, he would likely fill the role you had in mind. But to the original question, I'm wondering if Rex might go to the 46 Nickel considering who we've been bringing in and keeping. Maybe a 5-2 that practically becomes a 4-2-5 when you yank Lawson away from Run support. Hughes-Kyle-NT/Dareus-(3-4 DE)/Dareus Brown-Brown Gilmore-AW-Blanton-Graham-Darby Maybe sonme thing like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 we either need a box safety or a shut down nose tackle. I think its easier to get a box safety than a solid nose tackle. And if I want a box safety I offer low money to whitner and play him 12-15% of the snaps - run downs. There are some really good NT type guys coming out in this draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 we either need a box safety or a shut down nose tackle. I think its easier to get a box safety than a solid nose tackle. And if I want a box safety I offer low money to whitner and play him 12-15% of the snaps - run downs. I think there are some decent NT run options spread across the rounds that be effective. Whitner is probably out of the price range and Blanton is most likely that guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted April 5, 2016 Author Share Posted April 5, 2016 I think there are some decent NT run options spread across the rounds that be effective. Whitner is probably out of the price range and Blanton is most likely that guy They could also wind up drafting one of the LB/S hybrid guys such as Lee or Cravens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 They could also wind up drafting one of the LB/S hybrid guys such as Lee or Cravens. I can see either of these guys as Bill. Craven has been moving on up. Where is he projected more recently ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 They could also wind up drafting one of the LB/S hybrid guys such as Lee or Cravens. if cravens is there in the 4th im all over him. I've seen him fall in some mocks. The 3rd might be too high for him.I think there are some decent NT run options spread across the rounds that be effective. Whitner is probably out of the price range and Blanton is most likely that guythe nts I've seen are quick enough for Ryan's 2gap not position. I fear they'll be too slow. I think Blanton might be the box safety. What I've heard on him is that he can lay the lumber but isn't much help in coverage. With the cash they have on him, he would likely fill the role you had in mind. But to the original question, I'm wondering if Rex might go to the 46 Nickel considering who we've been bringing in and keeping. Maybe a 5-2 that practically becomes a 4-2-5 when you yank Lawson away from Run support. Hughes-Kyle-NT/Dareus-(3-4 DE)/Dareus Brown-Brown Gilmore-AW-Blanton-Graham-Darby Maybe sonme thing like that. if I had to start the 11 best guys I run a 3-4. We have to remember Lawson did his best behind Mario who didn't let the run break containment so Lawson just had the run. There are a fewdeDe's who fit that bill. The kid out of Baylor for example. But I don't know if we can afford him in on evert play. Lawson cannot be left by himself on the outside edge left to fend for himself. That's why he struggled with Schwartz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 if cravens is there in the 4th im all over him. I've seen him fall in some mocks. The 3rd might be too high for him. the nts I've seen are quick enough for Ryan's 2gap not position. I fear they'll be too slow. Hmm. i thought you meant space eater fat kid who can hold a ctr and g from moving the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinii Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 Defenses run the nickel roughly 2 out of 3 plays. Seems like a good time to line up a power runner like KW. just like in Madden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Pretty much. When you have the Pats throwing on third and short, you start making everything nickel or nickel hybrid. Which is why I'm ok with us drafting Ragland. *smoke bomb* so you want a banger who is slow in space? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts