Protocal69 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 http://espn.go.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4791502/bill-belichick-will-appreciate-roster-flexibility-of-new-rules-with-ir-designation This is kinda of a big thing regarding IR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 http://espn.go.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4791502/bill-belichick-will-appreciate-roster-flexibility-of-new-rules-with-ir-designation This is kinda of a big thing regarding IR It's a logical change IMO. I always thought having to designate at the time of IRing a player was kinda dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 What a hilarious spin to make this about how amazjnf belicheck was. I swear that guy has callouses on his dong from all the love he gets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxum Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 What a hilarious spin to make this about how amazjnf belicheck was. I swear that guy has callouses on his dong from all the love he gets. Please do not make this post all about WEO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincec Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 What a hilarious spin to make this about how amazjnf belicheck was. I swear that guy has callouses on his dong from all the love he gets. I thought the same. Like this is somehow an advantage for NE. The press is funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Let's be real here, this article was written by the NE Patriots beat write fro ESPN. So was he supposed to write how this would have affected the Minn Vikings? I get it that everyone here hates NE and Bill Belichick, but you need to get some level of reality and logic. Kind of funny to ridicule the writer for making it all about Belichick only to make it all about Belichick in a negative way. That's good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 It is a good change. Asking a team to know for sure which guys will recover and which won't in time to contribute later in the year was kind of dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 It is a good change. Asking a team to know for sure which guys will recover and which won't in time to contribute later in the year was kind of dumb. It was good rule when implemented and good first step. This is a bigger improvement IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 It was good rule when implemented and good first step. This is a bigger improvement IMO Fair point. Sometimes progress has to be incremental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Fair point. Sometimes progress has to be incremental. Continuous improvement right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts