Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

QUICK REMINDER:

 

Nobody Was Ever Charged for the 2020 Antifa Attack on the White House.

 

...More than 50 ­Secret Service officers were injured when they were pelted

with bricks, rocks, Molotov cocktails and bottles of urine while defending

the White House. We never hear about them.

 

President Trump and the First Lady had to be evacuated to an underground bunker

for their safety amid fears the White House would be overrun.

 

The media mocked Trump later as a coward. They memory-holed this event

 

but exaggerate everything about J6.

 

Nobody was charged over the White House attack.

 

 

 

 

https://nypost.com/2021/09/15/is-nancy-pelosi-pulling-gen-mark-milleys-strings-devine/

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Shocked 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
21 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Heartless pieces of ***** deserve to be run over.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

 

The Coming Storm

October 29, 2024 

 

We are on the precipice of a disaster.

 

There are several reasons for my belief.

The first is our voting system. Our system with the proliferation of mail-in balloting and lack of auditable controls seems purpose-designed to breed mistrust and corruption. Also while we talk about how voting now occurs before Election Day, we do not discuss the implications that in many jurisdictions it takes days if not weeks to count the ballots, which presents opportunities for mischief.

 

The second is the level of rhetoric from the Left over the past week, call it the “Hitler Gambit.”

There has been a lot of criticism from the Right regarding Jeffrey Goldberg’s article in The Atlantic “revealing” Trump’s affinity for Hitler. The critics says that the revelations are old and thinly sourced. The critics miss the point, which is that Goldberg’s article wasn’t so much meant to be an “October Surprise” as it was to give the Democrats the news hook they needed to launch their final argument that Trump is a fascist.

 

The Goldberg article was merely the starter’s gun for that final argument. Keep in mind that the owner of The Atlantic is Kamala’s “first friend.” On the same day that Goldberg’s article dropped, as if it was a coincidence, we had both the White House confirming that Biden believes Trump is a fascist, and Kamala remarking that Trump was a fascist and, given that and his affinity for Hitler, could not ever be trusted to return to the White House.

 

Just in case anyone missed the point, Kamala delivered her remarks not as a presidential candidate with an off-the-cuff comment, but in her official capacity with a prepared statement in front of the Vice President’s Residence at the U.S. Naval Observatory.

 

{snip}

 

The third is the Democrats’ declining belief in our Constitution.

 

Take a step back and you see that every warning light is flashing red.

 

Each of my three reasons has the potential to interact with the other ones synergistically.

 

Not only will there be a delay in declaring a winner in those jurisdictions that will take many days to count ballots, but the vague and sloppy system of mail-in balloting almost guarantees lengthy court battles by one party or another. If you think things are testy now, wait until you get to a post-Election Day environment where all of that energy is focused on specific operational and legal issues stemming from the flawed system I described above.

 

There’s been a lot of head scratching on the Right concerning what the Democrats are trying to accomplish with their “Hitler Talk.” In reality the Right is missing the point of the exercise: it isn’t to convince the undecided but rather to set the framework for the post-Election Day battle. While Republicans and the Right in general see an election as being composed of discrete phases of before and after, the Democrats and the Left see it as an integrated whole and their communications strategy now reflects that view.

 

That’s not to say there aren’t immediate benefits for the Democrats with their “Hitler Talk.” It could strengthen their base and prevent defections. But the primary target is the post-election.

 

Given the existing conditions of the undecided nature of the post-election environment, a narrowing of the stakes for victory and scope onto a select number of actions, and the apocalyptic rhetoric of the Democrats, you will have the potential for a catastrophe. If you can claim that you are trying to stop Hitler, then you have permission to let your freak flag fly, and there will be plenty of opportunities to do it.

 

The third reason acts as the removal of a boundary for action. If the electoral system provides the terrain, the Hitler talk provides the motive. Then, the third reason — the decline of belief among Democrats in the Constitution — increases the scope of possible action by the Democrats.

 

When I state this situation to friends, their primary objection to it is that it is too fantastic; what course of action would the Democrats actually take that would amount to more of a Jamie Raskin-led hissy fit? I find this objection to be a weak reed, and state that the experience of the past 40 years — from the sudden collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, to the various color revolutions — has shown that my friends’ sentiments lack a certain degree of imagination given underlying realities.

 

 

Post-election uncertainty, propaganda of the threat of a dark fascist night by an illegitimate insurrectionist and convicted felon, and the lack of belief in the Constitution. You have the predicate for action.

 

Nothing is certain. This particular result could be avoided. The Democrats may simply be bluffing playing the “Trump overturning democracy card.” The Democrats may collapse over the next week. The post-election environment, while uncertain, may tilt too strongly in Trump’s favor with, say, wins in places like Virginia and New Hampshire. Accordingly the Democrats may not be able to pull off a 2024-version of “Game 3.” We’ll get some rioting, a bunch of Jamie Raskin-led no votes on Jan. 6, but in general the lines will hold.

 

However that seems to be more than a wish and prayer. Sometimes you’ve just got to take what people are telling you as the gospel truth.

 

https://chicagoboyz.net/archives/72176.html

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

 

 

LIFE IN THE BLUE ZONES: 

 

Police brace for election violence, DC being boarded up.

 

On the heels of surveys showing that over half the nation’s voters believe there will be violence between the election and inauguration, law enforcement has begun to prepare for the worst. Some offices in Washington, D.C., are being boarded up, and police and military training has stepped up at the U.S. Capitol.

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/3211615/police-brace-for-election-violence/

Posted

 

 

In Case of a Trump Win - Democrat Governors Are Preparing for Violence

By Jim Thompson 

 

FTA:

The left has a very short memory when it comes to its political violence and its refusal to accept election results. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has refused to say he will certify a Trump win. He recently poured gasoline on his stupidity.   

 

Will there be blood if Trump wins? Undoubtedly. There will be rioters organizing and turning out on election day and the days that follow. We saw riots in 2017, and that was well before Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were calling Trump a threat to democracy and a Nazi.

 

Trump’s 2025 inauguration will be a flashpoint, and, in my opinion, the riots of January 20, 2017, will pale in comparison to the riots of 2024/2025.  

 

Buckle up. The nation will need more than 60 troops.    

 

https://redstate.com/jimthompson/2024/11/03/in-case-of-trumps-win-democrat-governors-are-preparing-for-violence-n2181450

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Hopefully one of the left-leaning posters here can speak to why this is happening. I’m not expecting it. At all. 

 

×
×
  • Create New...