outsidethebox Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 4 hours ago, LA Grant said: It's a reference to the previous gun thread when Tasker doubled down on his fundamentalist read on the Constitution so hard, in absolute opposition to any restrictions on Amendments, that his preferred version of society would strike down this ruling: http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/05/19/scotus.porn/index.html I think it's adorable that you find me clowning on Tasker more offensive than Tasker perpetuating propaganda lies from the gun lobby to discredit shooting victims. Good character you got there, bud. Your posts still make me laugh tho, something about the way you write makes me hear your voice as Scrappy Doo. You: The Parkland kids must be pawns or actors or liars, one or all of those. There is zero evidence of this, just ugly conspiracy theory rhetoric from the usual InfoWars clowns, then trickling down from there through Federalist down to B-Man. Nor can I articulate how this plot could actually make any kind of coherent sense (we'll leave that to a thread for Rhino, covering himself in newspaper clippings & red string) Also you: The NRA are heroic constitutional defenders, who cares if they threaten and bully victims of tragedy because it's inconvenient for their agenda. Who cares if they're corrupt as hell and the worst embodiment of corporate lobbying? They like guns, I like guns, they're good, I'm smart. Also also you: Restricting guns will lead to white genocide (even though it hasn't in European countries with similar gun laws, Australia, etc, but still! It is inevitable! Slippery slope!) Also also also you: "Right to bear arms shall not be infringed"! Arms specifically means firearms, and that other nonsense about a "well regulated militia" doesn't matter, or, it means 18-year-old Nikolas Cruz. If he can't get a gun, it's going to be white genocide in America. Me: You're a horrible f**king idiot, entirely illogical and contradictory, yet unbelievably pretentious. From the avatar to how many times you use awkward phrases like "bare asserts" or in the previous post "bare assertion" — why is it always bare asses with you on everything? Sheesh. Seriously though you are "fork in the electric outlet" dumb but you're a doughy neckbeard in a fedora so you're electrocuting yourself AND you're smug about it. It's astounding. Also me: We have seen countless examples of the NRA as bad actors, yet somehow you NEVER want to talk about it. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nra-accepts-foreign-donations-but-not-for-election-purposes-it-claims/ You: WELL I NEVER. WHERE IS YOUR DECENCY, SIR? Azalin: Stop fighting or I'll come bop ya, I will, ya big ol' meanie!!! Can you repeat that? I missed it the first time. Go ahead and take your time.
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 (edited) And again Grant denies the entire purpose of our Constitution, and all the history buttressing that understanding. Which makes sense given how the Constitution is problematic to his ideology under which the people serve the desires of the state, and have no rights. Edited March 29, 2018 by TakeYouToTasker
Azalin Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 6 hours ago, LA Grant said: Azalin: Stop fighting or I'll come bop ya, I will, ya big ol' meanie!!! All I did was call you a douche. Don't like it? Stop acting like a douche.
boyst Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 Now Trump has liberals defending corporate tax rates by attacking Amazon. Dudes over 9000 on troll level
LA Grant Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 7 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: And again Grant denies the entire purpose of our Constitution, and all the history buttressing that understanding. Which makes sense given how the Constitution is problematic to his ideology under which the people serve the desires of the state, and have no rights. (Oy, Tasker, again with the awkward homoerotic phrasing — "bare asserts" before, "history buttressing that understanding" — dude, I was clowning on you w/ NAMBLA but now I'm not sure, maybe your subconscious is trying to tell you something?) You keep singing this tune to yourself but it doesn't give your position any substance. We've already dismantled your contradictory ideology — as though it were only the contradictions that made it problematic, and not your many horrific assumptions (ie, your fear of white genocide) — but you're still chirping away like you have any kind of viable vision of society that is based in reality. You're looking at a shred of bark, thinking you see the forest. You do not. You are indoctrinated, living in the Glenn Beck sponsored fantasy utopia where the Constitution is immutable God, and God gives us all we need, and should never be questioned, corrected, or adjusted, under any circumstances. You've made this clear time and again (guns, pedophiles, etc). What Grant wants, what most people want, what the g*ddamn Founders themselves wanted & intended is for a society with laws that are fair for all and serve the common good. You're not interested in fairness, or the common good. You're only interested in selfish, little you and pretending that your self-centeredness is the rugged "individual sovereignty" that makes America great. You see this all as a zero-sum game, as though the individual loses anytime the greater collective gains. Your short-sighted, paranoid, & destructive foolishness — which is not unique to you, btw, as this is a mentality affecting a great many white male gun-owners — is quite literally the problem to making any progress toward fairness & justice for all people. That would be a problem for you if that was something you're interested in. You aren't. 1
LA Grant Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 5 hours ago, Azalin said: All I did was call you a douche. Don't like it? Stop acting like a douche. Message board name-calling doesn't bother me, as I told you before multiple times, ya li'l crotch-sniffing puppy dog. What does bother me — what should bother you — is the perpetuation of destructive lies. There's no such thing as honest debate in America anymore, and sorry to tell you, this isn't the fault of "both sides." This is the fault of right-wing billionaires intentionally choosing to disrupt information in such a way that we're arguing about arguing instead of any kind of nuanced discussion. Rupert Murdoch (Fox News) and Robert Mercer (Breitbart) have been very clear about this strategy. Congrats to them because it worked and continues to. Consider what I'm doing here. I personally am wading into the swampy murk of the "other side" to engage. Are you doing that? Are you seeking out liberal politics boards to seek out the opposition? Or are you content in your bubble here, Scrappy Doo? Just along for the ride in the Mystery Van as Rhino, Tasker, etc., pretend the only truth comes partisan right-wing propaganda websites? "Trust me, I know this writer personally!" Rhino says to you, right now in the other thread, and that's good enough for you. "I'd tell you his name, it's easy to find, but I don't want to dox him. Believe him over anyone else, though!" 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 In summary: Grant finds the concepts of individual rights and liberty to be problematic to the establishment of his Marxist utopia. To those ends he will lie and slander, spin and distort. He will attempt to impose a fictional account of the Founding, and the views of the Founders. And then he will blame you for his poor behavior. Again, Grant is a SWJ, and as such, he will always lie. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 11 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: In summary: Grant finds the concepts of individual rights and liberty to be problematic to the establishment of his Marxist utopia. To those ends he will lie and slander, spin and distort. He will attempt to impose a fictional account of the Founding, and the views of the Founders. And then he will blame you for his poor behavior. Again, Grant is a SWJ, and as such, he will always lie. All true - and I didn't read his latest. I just prefer to sum up LA Bloviator's motivation as such: 1
Azalin Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 1 hour ago, LA Grant said: Consider what I'm doing here. I personally am wading into the swampy murk of the "other side" to engage. Are you doing that? Are you seeking out liberal politics boards to seek out the opposition? Or are you content in your bubble here, Scrappy Doo? Just along for the ride in the Mystery Van as Rhino, Tasker, etc., pretend the only truth comes partisan right-wing propaganda websites? Oh spare me, you choad. You're "wading into the swampy murk" in some pathetic attempt to make yourself feel intellectually relevant, but you're nothing more than a frustrated, coffee-sipping, onsie-wearing, pseudo-revolutionary who doesn't know $%#$ about constitutional liberties. And the people you pride yourself on arguing with are the most staunch defenders of our liberties on this board. What the hell does that say about your position? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 3 minutes ago, Azalin said: Oh spare me, you choad. You're "wading into the swampy murk" in some pathetic attempt to make yourself feel intellectually relevant, but you're nothing more than a frustrated, coffee-sipping, onsie-wearing, pseudo-revolutionary who doesn't know $%#$ about constitutional liberties. And the people you pride yourself on arguing with are the most staunch defenders of our liberties on this board. What the hell does that say about your position? He said it himself - this place is the "other side", as in we are all the same. There are no differences of opinions between regular posters here in LA Asshat's "mind" (I hesitate to use that word in association with his drivel). He's brainwashed into thinking he's superior to "others" who think differently than him because he's a fascist. A charge he'll deny because he's a "progressive liberal" and other people told him that makes him superior. He doesn't have the mental bandwidth to realize the irony that while he thinks he's fighting racism and fascism, he's actually carrying the water for those agendas. He's a hateful, dishonest, and intellectually stunted individual who brings nothing to this board. I doubt he would remember how to breathe on his own if he ever closed his mouth. 1
/dev/null Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Is that meme proof of Aliens? I mean who else could genetically engineer a horse small enough for a squirrel or a squirrel large enough to sit on a horse? Edited March 29, 2018 by /dev/null typo 1 1
Koko78 Posted March 29, 2018 Posted March 29, 2018 1 hour ago, LA Grant said: What does bother me — what should bother you — is the perpetuation of destructive lies. There's no such thing as honest debate in America anymore, and sorry to tell you, this isn't the fault of "both sides." Remind us all, which "side" of this debate invented a NAMBLA strawman, then proceeded (and continues) to accuse the other "side" of supporting that organization when they disagree with you? Perhaps you should try to be honest, if you're looking for an "honest debate".
B-Man Posted March 29, 2018 Author Posted March 29, 2018 30 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Is that meme proof of Aliens? I mean who else could genetically engineer a horse small enough for a squirrel or a squirrel large enough to sit on a horse? Jeez.............I hope it's the first one.
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 30, 2018 Posted March 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Remind us all, which "side" of this debate invented a NAMBLA strawman, then proceeded (and continues) to accuse the other "side" of supporting that organization when they disagree with you? Perhaps you should try to be honest, if you're looking for an "honest debate". Let him keep going. He thinks he's winning. 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Jeez.............I hope it's the first one. Right? There are not enough scarey black rifles in the whole world to hunt a squirel that big.
IDBillzFan Posted March 30, 2018 Posted March 30, 2018 27 minutes ago, garybusey said: Laura has lost 7 advertisers so far today. And tomorrow she'll have 8 new ones, and people will still see Baby Hogg as a juvenile puppet of a juvenile party. If you guys could work for your constituents like you work to silence your critics, maybe you'd be able to field an opponent who can, oh, I don't know, climb down a flight of freaking stairs.
reddogblitz Posted March 30, 2018 Posted March 30, 2018 18 hours ago, LA Grant said: Stop fighting or I'll come bop ya Who do you think you are? Joe Biden? 2 hours ago, garybusey said: Laura has lost 7 advertisers so far today. Free market.
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 30, 2018 Posted March 30, 2018 17 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Who do you think you are? Joe Biden? Free market. I'm old enough to remember back when liberals were opposed to large corporations aligning with political parties to advocate for the violation of rights.
Recommended Posts