Jump to content

Liberal Protests


B-Man

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Lost in this is Grant's hilarious bare assertion that people acting with any sort of profit motive are bad actors, while those acting without what Grant can discern to be a profit motive are angelic.

 

Haha yes, hilarious! As we all know, the only morality is in the free market. Only corporations like gun manufacturers, and their lobbying groups, can be trusted to have our best interests — so what if they happen to make 'a killing' in the process, right? Meanwhile, yourself & Rhino (who liked your post) insist that somehow the Parkland kids are making a buck off of this (you can't figure out how, exactly, but somehow) in their quest to strip you of your God-given right.

 

This, as you've said before, will obviously lead directly to WHITE GENOCIIIIIIIIIDE. Just like all of the white genocides in Australia and throughout the many countries in Europe with similar gun laws. All of those genocides that happened right after they passed gun laws. Oh wait. I forgot, that was just one of your many disturbed fantasies. 

 

That's okay. I remember your reasoning from the other gun thread. You're as passionate for the NRA as you are for NAMBLA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, LA Grant said:

 

 

That's okay. I remember your reasoning from the other gun thread. You're as passionate for the NRA as you are for NAMBLA. 

 

 

Why do you post anything here if you're just here to be nothing but a douche of intergalactic proportions? Your arguments are nothing but an inane cocktail of leftist talking points, ignorance of the constitution, ad hominems, general douche-baggery, and an incredibly inflated sense of intellectual adequacy.

 

You haven't once tried to actually make any point except that anyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and you fail miserably at that. For example: NAMBLA.

 

Really? NAMBLA? You $#%@ing douche.

 

Seriously, go %$#% yourself.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2018 at 12:20 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Screen-Shot-2018-02-25-at-11.12.24-PM-60

 

You do see the massive leap in this though, right?

 

He's basically saying that because they don't want to support the NRA they don't want to support federal air marshal's, and any law enforcement. It makes no sense. I mean is united hypocrites for not letting your dumbass Constitutional carry on their planes?

 

 

On 3/26/2018 at 6:13 PM, reddogblitz said:

 

Seems to me whenever there is the rumor of more restrictive gun laws, the guns start flying off the shelves because people are afraid they government is coming after their guns.

 

And, somebody's gotta buy 'em to sell to the criminals. Win Win.

 

They'll come in from Mexico either way. This country can't get rid of guns, only an idiot would think that. 

 

But I'm not sure what harm comes in  what you said

 

 "("assault weapons" ban/gun show loop hole/background checks/high capacity magazines)."

 

What does any of that do for anybody? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Azalin said:

 

Why do you post anything here if you're just here to be nothing but a douche of intergalactic proportions? Your arguments are nothing but an inane cocktail of leftist talking points, ignorance of the constitution, ad hominems, general douche-baggery, and an incredibly inflated sense of intellectual adequacy.

 

You haven't once tried to actually make any point except that anyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and you fail miserably at that. For example: NAMBLA.

 

Really? NAMBLA? You $#%@ing douche.

 

Seriously, go %$#% yourself.

4x05-Cartman-Joins-NAMBLA-south-park-213

 

I'm sure if I gained weight and put marbles in my mouth I could be in NAMBLA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm just trying to figure out what Marlon Brando look-alikes have to do with this.. 

 

the-young-lions-1958-marlon-brando-ylio-

 

They're scary when they're packing military-style assault weapons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Azalin said:

 

Why do you post anything here if you're just here to be nothing but a douche of intergalactic proportions? Your arguments are nothing but an inane cocktail of leftist talking points, ignorance of the constitution, ad hominems, general douche-baggery, and an incredibly inflated sense of intellectual adequacy.

 

You haven't once tried to actually make any point except that anyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and you fail miserably at that. For example: NAMBLA.

 

Really? NAMBLA? You $#%@ing douche.

 

Seriously, go %$#% yourself.

His entire style of argument is to demand that you accept and operate through his base premises, then to attack the character of his opponents with ugly ad homs intended to discredit the individual making the argument, and then to make a series of bare asserts, strawmen, and bailey-motte fallacies.  For instance, right now he's asserting that because he can't visualize a profit motive for the protests, but can visualize one for the NRA, that the NRA are bad actors whose sole motivation is corporate profit seeking at the expense of dead kids (completely ignoring the Constitutional background of rights advocacy), and that the Parkland kids are magical, the protests grassroots, and disagreement means you hate Jews.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Azalin said:

 

Why do you post anything here if you're just here to be nothing but a douche of intergalactic proportions? Your arguments are nothing but an inane cocktail of leftist talking points, ignorance of the constitution, ad hominems, general douche-baggery, and an incredibly inflated sense of intellectual adequacy.

 

You haven't once tried to actually make any point except that anyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and you fail miserably at that. For example: NAMBLA.

 

Really? NAMBLA? You $#%@ing douche.

 

Seriously, go %$#% yourself.

    Whoa I don't blame you for being pissed.....i didn't even know what nambla was, I googled it and

was like wtf...one, that there is actually something as disgusting as that, and two this is so very

typical of extreme lefties, they either resort to spewing 'racist' or make deranged statements like this

"That's okay. I remember your reasoning from the other gun thread. You're as passionate for the NRA as you are for NAMBLA." 

He is as despicable as that organization is. Obviously a very low IQ involved there. 

Most ignorant poster on this board - first time i've ever put someone on ignore.

He actually makes tiberious look almost nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Albwan said:

    Whoa I don't blame you for being pissed.....i didn't even know what nambla was, I googled it and

was like wtf...one, that there is actually something as disgusting as that, and two this is so very

typical of extreme lefties, they either resort to spewing 'racist' or make deranged statements like this

"That's okay. I remember your reasoning from the other gun thread. You're as passionate for the NRA as you are for NAMBLA." 

He is as despicable as that organization is. Obviously a very low IQ involved there. 

Most ignorant poster on this board - first time i've ever put someone on ignore.

He actually makes tiberious look almost nice.

You had me up until your last sentence. Gator (Tiberius) is here every day and he doesn't miss a thread or an opportunity to say something immensely stupid. This Grant thing is just a piker in comparison. He can't even carry gator's telletubbies themed lunchbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/27/2018 at 10:23 PM, Azalin said:

Why do you post anything here if you're just here to be nothing but a douche of intergalactic proportions? Your arguments are nothing but an inane cocktail of leftist talking points, ignorance of the constitution, ad hominems, general douche-baggery, and an incredibly inflated sense of intellectual adequacy.

 

You haven't once tried to actually make any point except that anyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and you fail miserably at that. For example: NAMBLA.

 

Really? NAMBLA? You $#%@ing douche.

 

Seriously, go %$#% yourself.

 

It's a reference to the previous gun thread when Tasker doubled down on his fundamentalist read on the Constitution so hard, in absolute opposition to any restrictions on Amendments, that his preferred version of society would strike down this ruling: http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/05/19/scotus.porn/index.html

 

I think it's adorable that you find me clowning on Tasker more offensive than Tasker perpetuating propaganda lies from the gun lobby to discredit shooting victims. Good character you got there, bud. 

 

Your posts still make me laugh tho, something about the way you write makes me hear your voice as Scrappy Doo.

 

17 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

His entire style of argument is to demand that you accept and operate through his base premises, then to attack the character of his opponents with ugly ad homs intended to discredit the individual making the argument, and then to make a series of bare asserts, strawmen, and bailey-motte fallacies.  For instance, right now he's asserting that because he can't visualize a profit motive for the protests, but can visualize one for the NRA, that the NRA are bad actors whose sole motivation is corporate profit seeking at the expense of dead kids (completely ignoring the Constitutional background of rights advocacy), and that the Parkland kids are magical, the protests grassroots, and disagreement means you hate Jews.

 

You: The Parkland kids must be pawns or actors or liars, one or all of those. There is zero evidence of this, just ugly conspiracy theory rhetoric from the usual InfoWars clowns, then trickling down from there through Federalist down to B-Man. Nor can I articulate how this plot could actually make any kind of coherent sense (we'll leave that to a thread for Rhino, covering himself in newspaper clippings & red string)

 

Also you: The NRA are heroic constitutional defenders, who cares if they threaten and bully victims of tragedy because it's inconvenient for their agenda. Who cares if they're corrupt as hell and the worst embodiment of corporate lobbying? They like guns, I like guns, they're good, I'm smart. 

 

Also also you: Restricting guns will lead to white genocide (even though it hasn't in European countries with similar gun laws, Australia, etc, but still! It is inevitable! Slippery slope!)

 

Also also also you: "Right to bear arms shall not be infringed"! Arms specifically means firearms, and that other nonsense about a "well regulated militia" doesn't matter, or, it means 18-year-old Nikolas Cruz. If he can't get a gun, it's going to be white genocide in America.

 

Me: You're a horrible f**king idiot, entirely illogical and contradictory, yet unbelievably pretentious. From the avatar to how many times you use awkward phrases like "bare asserts" or in the previous post "bare assertion" — why is it always bare asses with you on everything? Sheesh. Seriously though you are "fork in the electric outlet" dumb but you're a doughy neckbeard in a fedora so you're electrocuting yourself AND you're smug about it. It's astounding.

 

Also me: We have seen countless examples of the NRA as bad actors, yet somehow you NEVER want to talk about it. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nra-accepts-foreign-donations-but-not-for-election-purposes-it-claims/

 

You: WELL I NEVER. WHERE IS YOUR DECENCY, SIR?

 

Azalin: Stop fighting or I'll come bop ya, I will, ya big ol' meanie!!!

Edited by LA Grant
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Grant, it isn't. It's just dumbassery passed off as "debate". If you had more than a thimble full of brains in that noggin of yours, you'd understand. 

 

But since you're clearly mentally challenged, this is the best you can against - not just superior minds in Az and Tasker - but better people. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, joesixpack said:

29542681_10204109921385238_5638397164319

 

He WAS there. This was only ever confusing for snowflakes who cannot handle messages they don't like, desperate to find any way to discredit the messenger. 

 

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2018/03/28/mistake.-wrong.-im-sorry./

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2018/03/26/new-video-casts-doubt-whether-david-hogg-school-day-shooting/

 

You f***ing moron. 

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

No, Grant, it isn't. It's just dumbassery passed off as "debate". If you had more than a thimble full of brains in that noggin of yours, you'd understand. 

 

But since you're clearly mentally challenged, this is the best you can against - not just superior minds in Az and Tasker - but better people. 

 

?

How's your Deep State theory looking these days, bud? 

Edited by LA Grant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Proving my point. 

 

(I didn't even read his post, I'm playing the numbers )

 

Rhino: I am the most open-minded person on this board! I am not partisan at all! Read betweeeeeen the liiiiiines, man.

 

Also Rhino: <links to Federalist, Nunes tweets, Hannity, Fox News, etc>

 

Me: Then why are you only posting right-wing partisan sources who have been proven discreditable multiple times?

 

Rhino: lalalala I can't heeear yooooou

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Still making my point for me...

(still not reading your posts, just going off your record for idiocy) 

image.jpeg

 

Not surprising "ignore" is your endgame, but then again, that's your solution to everything doesn't fit your narrow paranoid worldview, isn't it?

 

The amount of posts you've entered into your personal echo chamber threads are proof of that.

 

Nunes 2020! ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...