Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 9/15/2020 at 9:55 AM, Chef Jim said:

I was listening to a talk radio show this morning and someone had emailed in with a new term for SJW.  Woke Supremacists.  It's perfect! They think that they are superior to anyone else and those who disagree and are not woke are inferior.   

Those wokesters are the height of hypocrisy.  They believe their superior intellect and moral character is the ultimate pinnacle of human thought and beliefs.  And anyone that disagrees with them is obviously of interior intelligence, lacking in moral and ethical standards, or suffering from some behavioral disorder.   In other words, they hold preconceived "bias" against anyone that might have an opinion that differs from theirs.  They suffer from the same behavior as the people they detest.

In reality they are all full of crap and soaked in endless contradictions, circumstantial inconsistencies like supporting the protests, riots, and looting as long as it doesn't come to their neighborhood.  Just plain old douche bags.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
35 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Those wokesters are the height of hypocrisy.  They believe their superior intellect and moral character is the ultimate pinnacle of human thought and beliefs.  And anyone that disagrees with them is obviously of interior intelligence, lacking in moral and ethical standards, or suffering from some behavioral disorder.   In other words, they hold preconceived "bias" against anyone that might have an opinion that differs from theirs.  They suffer from the same behavior as the people they detest.

In reality they are all full of crap and soaked in endless contradictions, circumstantial inconsistencies like supporting the protests, riots, and looting as long as it doesn't come to their neighborhood.  Just plain old douche bags.

 

Hence the title of Woke Supremacists.  

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Doc said:

First it was "#metoo and now it's BLM.  Cautionary tale of overplaying one's hand.

The women with the dog in New York who called the cop on the bird watcher was clearly in the mindset that metoo was still the power play. She is not a racist she is a sexist.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

CLASS PRIVILEGE ON DISPLAY:

 

Screen-Shot-2020-09-16-at-8.43.33-PM.png

 
 
 
 
 

They ought to have known the consequences of their actions, but somehow these two lawyers -- one of them Princeton undergrad/NYU (a top 14 law school) JD -- didn't appear to know that they were committing a federal offense.  Oops.

My advice: take the best plea deal you can get. Idiots. Violent idiots. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/albertsamaha/colin-mattis-urooj-rahman-lawyers-arrested-protests?scrolla=5eb6d68b7fedc32c19ef33b4

 

"Brooklyn’s district attorney's office handled most of those cases, which prosecutors processed through the night as the arrests poured in. Ten people were released without charges, and most others were hit with low-level infractions, such as criminal mischief or disorderly conduct. A few faced allegations as severe as illegal gun possession.

The case against Rahman and Mattis, however, took a different track. Because the incident involved an explosive device, a specialized unit of NYPD officers and FBI agents, called the Joint Terrorism Task Force — formed in 1980 to root out threats to national security — spearheaded the investigation. Within hours of the arrest, before Brooklyn prosecutors had even begun writing up charges, FBI agent Kyle Johnson submitted a criminal complaint in federal court, and federal prosecutors informed local authorities that the US attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New York was taking over the case."

Edited by The Frankish Reich
  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...