bilzfancy Posted July 29, 2020 Posted July 29, 2020 I know how to get the lamestream media to finally cover the riots in Portland and Seattle, and get their democratic leaders to end it real quick.........just put MAGA hats on the rioters 2
B-Man Posted July 30, 2020 Author Posted July 30, 2020 YES, AND THE NATIONAL PRESS IS DELIBERATELY COVERING IT UP: In Portland, Seattle, Homeland Security Is Facing Organized, Criminal Activity. 1 2
ALF Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 Judge Andrew Napolitano: Portland protests are about dissent, and without dissent we'd have little freedom Only a government hateful or fearful of the people it claims to serve uses force to silence them. The federal forces in Portland are doing far more than protecting a federal courthouse. They are listening to people’s phone calls and capturing their text messages and emails without warrants. They are materially interfering with lawful dissent. It is one thing to build a wall or a fence around a courthouse and man it with armed guards. It is quite another to wade into a crowd of peaceful demonstrators with tear gas of such intensity and ferocity -- its active ingredient is 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile -- that it is prohibited in wartime by treaties to which the United States is a signatory. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/portland-protests-dissent-freedom-andrew-napolitano 1
Westside Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 8 minutes ago, ALF said: Judge Andrew Napolitano: Portland protests are about dissent, and without dissent we'd have little freedom Only a government hateful or fearful of the people it claims to serve uses force to silence them. The federal forces in Portland are doing far more than protecting a federal courthouse. They are listening to people’s phone calls and capturing their text messages and emails without warrants. They are materially interfering with lawful dissent. It is one thing to build a wall or a fence around a courthouse and man it with armed guards. It is quite another to wade into a crowd of peaceful demonstrators with tear gas of such intensity and ferocity -- its active ingredient is 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile -- that it is prohibited in wartime by treaties to which the United States is a signatory. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/portland-protests-dissent-freedom-andrew-napolitano You're so full of ***** if you think that is a peaceful protest. Burning, looting, assaulting are not considered peaceful. You're either dumb as a brick or drank too much of the antifa kool aid to think it is peaceful. How can you have a conversation with someone who flat out lies? What is your agenda here?
ALF Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 3 minutes ago, westside2 said: You're so full of ***** if you think that is a peaceful protest. Burning, looting, assaulting are not considered peaceful. You're either dumb as a brick or drank too much of the antifa kool aid to think it is peaceful. How can you have a conversation with someone who flat out lies? What is your agenda here? That is what Judge Andrew Napolitano a FOX news contributor believes not me you idiot ,
Westside Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 Just now, ALF said: That is what Judge Andrew Napolitano a FOX news contributor believes not me you idiot , Do you agree with that idiot's comment? You sure the hell didn't disagree. So one is left to believe you agree? You're such a disingenuous prick. I know you can't help it, but try harder.
ALF Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 1 minute ago, westside2 said: Do you agree with that idiot's comment? You sure the hell didn't disagree. So one is left to believe you agree? You're such a disingenuous prick. I know you can't help it, but try harder. FU
BuffaloHokie13 Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 20 minutes ago, ALF said: Judge Andrew Napolitano: Portland protests are about dissent, and without dissent we'd have little freedom Only a government hateful or fearful of the people it claims to serve uses force to silence them. The federal forces in Portland are doing far more than protecting a federal courthouse. They are listening to people’s phone calls and capturing their text messages and emails without warrants. They are materially interfering with lawful dissent. It is one thing to build a wall or a fence around a courthouse and man it with armed guards. It is quite another to wade into a crowd of peaceful demonstrators with tear gas of such intensity and ferocity -- its active ingredient is 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile -- that it is prohibited in wartime by treaties to which the United States is a signatory. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/portland-protests-dissent-freedom-andrew-napolitano Honest question, is there any evidence of the federal law enforcement officers interrupting a peaceful protest? My understanding is that they waited inside the courthouse until things escalated to the point of needing to be dispersed (i.e. fireworks and other projectiles being thrown inside, fences being cut by saw or torch) and then, well, dispersed the crowd. It seems to me that the actions of the feds in Portland were almost universally reactionary and prompted by other acts of aggression towards them or federal property. Also, is there any evidence of his claim about unlawful surveillance? I haven't seen anything about that.
KRC Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said: Honest question, is there any evidence of the federal law enforcement officers interrupting a peaceful protest? My understanding is that they waited inside the courthouse until things escalated to the point of needing to be dispersed (i.e. fireworks and other projectiles being thrown inside, fences being cut by saw or torch) and then, well, dispersed the crowd. It seems to me that the actions of the feds in Portland were almost universally reactionary and prompted by other acts of aggression towards them or federal property. Also, is there any evidence of his claim about unlawful surveillance? I haven't seen anything about that. You don't need evidence. Just make stuff up. It has proven to work extremely well for the dimwitted liberals. 2 1
Rob's House Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 39 minutes ago, ALF said: Judge Andrew Napolitano: Portland protests are about dissent, and without dissent we'd have little freedom Only a government hateful or fearful of the people it claims to serve uses force to silence them. The federal forces in Portland are doing far more than protecting a federal courthouse. They are listening to people’s phone calls and capturing their text messages and emails without warrants. They are materially interfering with lawful dissent. It is one thing to build a wall or a fence around a courthouse and man it with armed guards. It is quite another to wade into a crowd of peaceful demonstrators with tear gas of such intensity and ferocity -- its active ingredient is 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile -- that it is prohibited in wartime by treaties to which the United States is a signatory. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/portland-protests-dissent-freedom-andrew-napolitano Andrew Napolitano outed himself as a lying sack of sh!t during the Russia debacle. It's not surprising to see him doubling down on his sedition. The fact that he claims anyone is trying to "silence" the tantrum throwers, who 2 months in still don't have a coherent message, exposes him for the naked shill that he is. 1 1
GG Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 18 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said: They have not given a name or information on how they know who it is. They also are not pressing going to arrest him or charge him I found out from CNN. The only official comment I could find from the MPD said it was an ongoing investigation. Lastly they reported a month or so ago this guy was a cop, but now we believe it is a white supremacists. Slim just keep believing whatever you want and only read what you agree with. That was the initial story a month ago that he was a St Paul cop.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 ...Soros?......a REAL shocker…………. DAs backed by Soros, other liberal activists join fray in clash with police Under-the-radar political investments made by progressive groups in recent years may be paying off By Ronn Blitzer | Fox News Calls for drastic criminal justice and police reforms have swept the country since the death of George Floyd, but local prosecutors already are making waves on that front -- in a sign that under-the-radar political investments made by progressive groups in recent years are paying off. District attorneys and current candidates whose campaigns benefited from the work of left-wing organizations – including ones backed by liberal billionaire George Soros – are now pushing for new practices that could see sharp reductions in prosecutions and incarcerations. Soros, through the Justice & Public Safety PAC and other groups, has been spending millions of dollars on prosecutorial races in recent years, with a number of beneficiaries making headlines since their elections. St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, who was boosted by Soros in her campaign, drew controversy when she announced her office was bringing felony charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who brandished guns outside their home as protesters marched by in June. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/da-soros-justice
Westside Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 42 minutes ago, ALF said: FU Go move to russia you f'n commie
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 2 hours ago, GG said: That was the initial story a month ago that he was a St Paul cop. My point is that the media is willing to lie and print completely unverified items with the flimsiest of info.
IDBillzFan Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 2 hours ago, ALF said: That is what Judge Andrew Napolitano a FOX news contributor believes not me you idiot , You're making the classic, lazy leftist mistake of thinking that just because Napolitano leans right that everyone who leans right automatically agrees with him. You probably think Lincoln Project represents right-leaning thinking as well. We can't explain this to leftists enough: right-leaning people are different from left-leaning people in that they don't believe everything right-leaning people say. Left-leaning people never question what they're told by left-leaning people because independent thought is foreign to them. It's really just that simple, and completely evident in your quote above. 3 1
Recommended Posts