Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

ROGER KIMBALL: The lunacy of the ‘largely peaceful protest.’

By now, the mainstream media has perfected the mendacious gambit with a sort of stereoscopic vision, saying one thing while also saying the opposite. One of the best of the bunch came a few days ago when ABC, reporting on efforts of those ‘largely peaceful’ rioters to burn down a courthouse in Oakland, acknowledged that some of the ‘largely peaceful’ protesters ‘smashed windows, spray-painted graffiti and pointed lasers at officers’.

 

Lasers? Yes, they’re a new favorite. As White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany noted when describing other incidents, ‘A federal agent’s hand was impaled by planted nails, another federal agent was shot with a pellet gun, leaving a wound deep to the bone, and tragically, three federal officers were likely left permanently blinded by the rioters using lasers pointed directly into their eyes.’

 

But then ABC got out the sugar and tweeted this about the Oakland incident: ‘Protesters in California set fire to a courthouse, damaged a police station and assaulted officers after a peaceful demonstration intensified.’

 

‘Intensified’? ‘A peaceful demonstration intensified’? The Twittersphere loved that one. It brought out everyone’s inner imp. The Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto was quick off the mark with a delectable contribution to the general levity: ‘It became even more intensely peaceful,’ he wrote in response to ABC’s absurd tweet.

 

And Steve Hayward deserves honorable mention for this gem: ‘If ABC News covered Pearl Harbor: “Honolulu, Dec. 8: A peaceful flyover by Japanese pilots intensified yesterday…’

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, B-Man said:

ROGER KIMBALL: The lunacy of the ‘largely peaceful protest.’

By now, the mainstream media has perfected the mendacious gambit with a sort of stereoscopic vision, saying one thing while also saying the opposite. One of the best of the bunch came a few days ago when ABC, reporting on efforts of those ‘largely peaceful’ rioters to burn down a courthouse in Oakland, acknowledged that some of the ‘largely peaceful’ protesters ‘smashed windows, spray-painted graffiti and pointed lasers at officers’.

 

Lasers? Yes, they’re a new favorite. As White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany noted when describing other incidents, ‘A federal agent’s hand was impaled by planted nails, another federal agent was shot with a pellet gun, leaving a wound deep to the bone, and tragically, three federal officers were likely left permanently blinded by the rioters using lasers pointed directly into their eyes.’

 

But then ABC got out the sugar and tweeted this about the Oakland incident: ‘Protesters in California set fire to a courthouse, damaged a police station and assaulted officers after a peaceful demonstration intensified.’

 

‘Intensified’? ‘A peaceful demonstration intensified’? The Twittersphere loved that one. It brought out everyone’s inner imp. The Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto was quick off the mark with a delectable contribution to the general levity: ‘It became even more intensely peaceful,’ he wrote in response to ABC’s absurd tweet.

 

And Steve Hayward deserves honorable mention for this gem: ‘If ABC News covered Pearl Harbor: “Honolulu, Dec. 8: A peaceful flyover by Japanese pilots intensified yesterday…’

 

 

 


List the lies 

Posted
2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Now he's quoting the Lincoln project -- a known Russian cut out. So, he's clearly working on behalf of Putin.

 

All the leftists are quoting LP. They have really found a niche with the left, and the more the left quotes them, the more evidence you have about unbelievably stupid leftists are.

 

You barely need to scratch the surface to see what genuinely drives LP; Russia and financial woes. But the left keeps giving them millions. It's funny, but embarrassing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

All the leftists are quoting LP. They have really found a niche with the left, and the more the left quotes them, the more evidence you have about unbelievably stupid leftists are.

 

You barely need to scratch the surface to see what genuinely drives LP; Russia and financial woes. But the left keeps giving them millions. It's funny, but embarrassing.


Thanks for your insight - @Deranged Rhino

Posted
2 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I don't know who these people are or what "side" they are on but I do know one thing about them, they're A$$holes.

My uncle used to describe people with little common sense and unable to keep quiet to appear smarter than they really are people with "paper a$$holes"  When they sh*t out of their mouth, their ####### falls apart.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Try as you might but your bottomless need to twist, control and derail like all narcissists will not work.

 

Keep trying cult leader.

 


? 

Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

ROGER KIMBALL: The lunacy of the ‘largely peaceful protest.’

 

tragically, three federal officers were likely left permanently blinded by the rioters using lasers pointed directly into their eyes.’

 

But then ABC got out the sugar and tweeted this about the Oakland incident: ‘Protesters in California set fire to a courthouse, damaged a police station and assaulted officers after a peaceful demonstration intensified.’

 

‘Intensified’? ‘A peaceful demonstration intensified’? The Twittersphere loved that one. It brought out everyone’s inner imp. The Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto was quick off the mark with a delectable contribution to the general levity: ‘It became even more intensely peaceful,’ he wrote in response to ABC’s absurd tweet.

Trump 2020

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

 

 

HE’S NOT WRONG:

 

 

Screen-Shot-2020-07-27-at-9.23.57-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2020-07-27-at-9.24.10-PM.png

 

 

 

 

The rioting and destruction are the point. George Floyd, at this point, is barely even an excuse.

 
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
9 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

HE’S NOT WRONG:

 

 

Screen-Shot-2020-07-27-at-9.23.57-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2020-07-27-at-9.24.10-PM.png

 

 

 

 

The rioting and destruction are the point. George Floyd, at this point, is barely even an excuse.

 

Wait. Who's George Floyd?

1 hour ago, Kemp said:

Annotation 2020-07-28 075334.jpg

Sometimes children need to be spanked when they wreck the house.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Kemp said:

Annotation 2020-07-28 075334.jpg


State’s Rights need to be respected but the safety of the citizens of the country need to be protected and if the states don’t provide that protection the Feds need to step in. You know protecting us from enemies foreign and domestic.  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

Clarity is a good thing, thank you Mr. Barr

 

 

Attorney General William Barr Releases Opening Statement for Tuesday’s House Judiciary Hearing—Blows Apart Democrats’ George Floyd Narrative

by Jim Hoft

 

Original Article

 

Attorney General Bill Barr released his statement to the House Judiciary Committee scheduled for Tuesday.

 

Democrats won’t like to hear this fact-check. Police forces today are far more diverse than ever before; there are both more black police chiefs and more black officers in the ranks

 

 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Barr testimony delayed after Jerry Nadler gets into car accident

by Mike Brest

Original Article

 

Attorney General William Barr's testimony in front of the House Judiciary Committee has been delayed after Chairman Jerry Nadler was in a car accident on his way to Capitol Hill. Nadler, a New York Democrat, was not injured, a spokesman for the congressman told CNN. Nadler was not driving the vehicle at the time of the accident. The oversight hearing with Barr, originally set for 10 a.m. EDT on Tuesday, is now expected to start 45 minutes behind schedule.

 

 

The lunacy of the ‘largely peaceful protest’

by Roger Kimball

 

Original Article

 

The great conundrum facing the anti-American left at the moment is how to react to the violent protest ripping up various Democratic-run cities. What is the preferred narrative?

The two main choices are

1) it’s all peaceful protest, the ‘right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances’? o

r 2) let ’er rip: we’re out there destroying stuff and hurting people because the country’s falling apart and the sooner the better. 

 

 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...