Jauronimo Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: A protest does not hurt the people you're trying to help.You are melding a peaceful protest with ginned up rioting and looting. One is not like the other. I am not but thanks. I'll say it again: rioting bad, looting bad. I hereby condemn rioting and looting to the maximum in accordance with the highest standards of the board as established by Magox.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 5 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: You literally just said they feel injustice but they're perceptions are inaccurate, did you not? How is that different than "they have a right to protest but have no case"? I think he said that the accuracy is debatable, not inaccurate. Isn't that the point? An open conversation on what's truly wrong and how it can be addressed? 1
4merper4mer Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 5 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: Shouldn't you be scouring the internet for more beat down porn? Google purple hair liberal gets pwned and tell us what comes up. I can do that AND point out what a phony you are. Both are simple.
Taro T Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 Just now, Jauronimo said: Of course they have the right to protest. You can protest anything. Doesn't mean the fine people here believe the protesters have a legit case and many do not. How many times have I read in this forum "Chauvin was arrested. What are they even protesting?". Yes, there was considerable doubt that these officers would face any repercussions. Yes, rioting is bad. Looting is bad. I don't think I have seen anyone argue otherwise and if people have, they are wrong. To the bolded: don't know. How many times have you read it? And, since we're asking questions: when is the last time a police officer was fired while an investigation into his behavior was ongoing that additional punishments weren't later brought? Honestly can't come up with an example ottomh w/in the past 30 years. Assuming you have some as am presuming there was a reason for having "considerable doubt" that additional punishment (read charges) would be forthcoming.
Back2Buff Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 1 hour ago, bbb said: A lot of feet in that video Here is a easier version: 1 2
Jauronimo Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said: I think he said that the accuracy is debatable, not inaccurate. Isn't that the point? An open conversation on what's truly wrong and how it can be addressed? He did. Doesn't that imply that he believes the protest to be of questionable merit? If you don't believe the people have a real gripe, if you believe the stats/facts do not support their argument, it would definitely explain the difference between reactions to protests at home and protests abroad.
Dante Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 23 hours ago, Dante said: One positive out all this bullshite. For all the hard work the left has done at gun grabbing, this has set it back 30 years. In fact, they are going to be more popular than ever. All the fake mass shooting. The constant fear tactics traumatizing young kids in elementary schools with active shooter drills. On and on, all for not. No one in their right mind would give up personal protection now. Here you go https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/1/gun-sales-surge-80-may-research-firm/
Kevbeau Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: This is 4chan....again...right?
BuffaloHokie13 Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 1 minute ago, Jauronimo said: He did. Doesn't that imply that he believes the protest to be of questionable merit? If you don't believe the people have a real gripe, if you believe the stats/facts do not support their argument, it would definitely explain the difference between reactions to protests at home and protests abroad. Do you think that those protesting are absolutely 100% correct on all of their assertions? Or do you think that perhaps they are mistaken about any of it? If there is a middle ground, then it should be found through an open and honest dialog and assessment of the facts available. A legitimate protest absolutely should start a dialog. Unless you believe that protests are meritless as soon as the protesters concede a single point. 3 2
4merper4mer Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 (edited) 48 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: I am not but thanks. I'll say it again: rioting bad, looting bad. I hereby condemn rioting and looting to the maximum in accordance with the highest standards of the board as established by Magox. More snide crap. Please show one comment from anyone in this thread stating any of the peaceful protests are illegitimate in any way. Indeed people have lamented looting and rioting but that is it. Your fake agreement, while you actually support the riots is duly noted. I don't really think you support the riots. I just said that to mirror your wise ass insinuations about what others "secretly" feel about peaceful protests. It's pretty see through. Get better at it or don't do it. Side point: Why do you think people are protesting in London and Paris? Edited June 5, 2020 by 4merper4mer
billsfan1959 Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 6 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: You literally just said they feel injustice but they're perceptions are inaccurate, did you not? How is that different than "they have a right to protest but have no case"? I said the degree of the accuracy of their perceptions is debatable. I didn't say they were entirely inaccurate. They can have a feeling that they genuinely feel. They have the right to express what they feel in a protest. I fully support any peaceful protest. However, it doesn't mean that what they feel is based on an entirely accurate perception. That is where expression of feelings is followed by honest dialogue. That really shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp and it does not equate to saying they "have no case." Perhaps it is just too nuanced for you. 1
Dante Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 5 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: More snide crap. Please show one comment from anyone in this thread stating any of the peaceful protests are illegitimate in any way. Indeed people have lamented looting and rioting but that is it. Your fake agreement, while you actually support the riots with is duly noted. Reveal hidden contents I don't really think you support the riots. I just said that to mirror your wise ass insinuations about what others "secretly" feel about peaceful protests. It's pretty see through. Get better at it or don't do it. Side point: Why do you think people are protesting in London and Paris? Paid agitators making it go international.
Wacka Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said: Martha's Vineyard lol. Was he hanging with those bad apples, the Kennedy clan?
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: ...how the hell does she think she can tell private businesses who they can or cannot rent rooms to?......DC has had some mayoral winners..."District of Columbia" sure fits...more drugs than the Columbian cartels......our nation's capital....sad....hats off to Marion Barry..... Edited June 5, 2020 by OldTimeAFLGuy 1 1
billsfan1959 Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: I love the request regarding white women: "Guilt them into getting rid of their stright 'white' hair to show 'solidarity' with black women." Just guilt them into it. Just shame them into it. Just bully them into it. Seems like a reasonable, honest, respectful way to go about doing things. 4
IDBillzFan Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 56 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's a deliberate set up. She wants riots. They need to regain control of the news cycle. It's that shameless. Going to be a rough weekend in DC. Courtesy of their mayor. Sad to watch, really, but we all know that DC will never be run by anyone other than a leftist who chooses violence over protection. 1
Dante Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 5 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...how the hell does she think she can tell private businesses who they can or cannot rent rooms to?......DC has had some mayoral winners..."District of Columbia" sure fits...more drugs than the Columbian cartels......our nation's capital....sad.... For her/them/Government it's easy. Just some sort of emergency, like a pandemic or unrest and everyone's legal rights go out the window. Easy peasy shortcut to communism.
Unforgiven Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said: I love the request regarding white women: "Guilt them into getting rid of their stright 'white' hair to show 'solidarity' with black women." Just guilt them into it. Just shame them into it. Just bully them into it. Seems like a reasonable, honest, respectful way to go about doing things. They are empty shells. I wonder how you can guilt someone into something they didn't do? Some serious gaslighting, cointel pro style. Lol I must be racist, I don't feel any guilt whatsoever. Edited June 5, 2020 by Unforgiven 1
Recommended Posts