billsfan1959 Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 3 minutes ago, Margarita said: baloney. and Yes there is a difference between peaceful protesters and criminal behavior. HUGE difference but those non rubber bullets would be flying regardless at everyone there wouldnt they...... As you stated, "...there is a difference between peaceful protesters and criminal behavior. HUGE difference..." Peaceful protesters are protesters, criminals are criminals. Please show us one post where anyone advocated violence agains protesters (by your own definition). When you are done with that, then show us where Trump advocated violence against protesters. As far as the criminals go, are you advocating that we just let them loot, vandalize, set fires, and assault people until they tire themselves out? If not, what would you do to stop them? Please be specific. You have a tendency to make sweeping generalizations 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Margarita said: delusional thinking here again THANK YOU for speaking for the "they" you have not the slightest clue about. So many Solomons in here. lol I’m pretty sure the “they” he was referring to in his second paragraph were the same people in his first paragraph that he knows. ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Margarita said: Thank you for beong the voice of americans everywhere SMH ...just because you can lecture someone on a message board doesnt mean you are absolutely correct. How in hell do you know what every protester is thinking? THAT to me is idiotic I don’t need to know what every protestor is thinking to know that their entire movement is now defined by the looting and pillaging. Don’t be obtuse. If there are people who are honestly seeking to promote justice and stand up for the innocent, they aren’t being represented by the looters and burners and they need to renounce those actions. I have yet to see that. As for the college HOF, someone else posted it. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 18 hours ago, Foxx said: so... https://twitter.com/justinjm1/status/1266445008066002945 So by posting that you're basically announcing you support the Klan, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 Just now, billsfan1959 said: As you stated, "...there is a difference between peaceful protesters and criminal behavior. HUGE difference..." Peaceful protesters are protesters, criminals are criminals. Please show us one post where anyone advocated violence agains protesters (by your own definition). When you are done with that, then show us where Trump advocated violence against protesters. As far as the criminals go, are you advocating that we just let them loot, vandalize, set fires, and assault people until they tire themselves out? If not, what would you do to stop them? Please be specific. You have a tendency to make sweeping generalizations bilzfancy "hoped" they would breach a barrier ...meaning there was no criminal activity happening at that point solely protest but he WANTED them to, wished they would.....why... so they'd be shot? SMH Im not justifying squat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 29 minutes ago, Margarita said: some of the posters here (you) are advocating violence against protesters, Trumps tweets regarding this situation have made this situation worse. A voice of rationality was needed instead he like yourself seemingly is advocating violence. Insinuating that these protests are there as anti trump in hopes of hurting him nature vs anti police brutality. Im not so naive as to think everyone protesting is solely due to the death of a black man at the hands of a bad white cop but reading this thread makes me think the politicalization of this protest in some way supercedes its original cause. And I dont agree. No you dipshit. We’re advocating violence against those burning and looting American cities to the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 2 minutes ago, whatdrought said: I don’t need to know what every protestor is thinking to know that their entire movement is now defined by the looting and pillaging. Don’t be obtuse. If there are people who are honestly seeking to promote justice and stand up for the innocent, they aren’t being represented by the looters and burners and they need to renounce those actions. I have yet to see that. As for the college HOF, someone else posted it. you assume that looters and criminal actions aren't being renounced, especially by "liberals"....wrong. and I disagree with your generalized statement " know that their entire movement is now defined by the looting and pillaging." Wrong again. 1 minute ago, whatdrought said: No you dipshit. We’re advocating violence against those burning and looting American cities to the ground. death penalty for looting....Gotcha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 Just now, Margarita said: you assume that looters and criminal actions aren't being renounced, especially by "liberals"....wrong. and I disagree with your generalized statement " know that their entire movement is now defined by the looting and pillaging." Wrong again. Where is it being denounced? If there are any protestors who aren’t looting and burning, are they still going out to the protests that are now driven by looting and burning? If so, that’s their identity. You can’t say “we’re together, but only have of our group are anarchists.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 Just now, Margarita said: bilzfancy "hoped" they would breach a barrier ...meaning there was no criminal activity happening at that point solely protest but he WANTED them to, wished they would.....why... so they'd be shot? SMH Im not justifying squat Really reaching there. That is all you got after going on about people in this thread advocating violence against protesters? BTW, I don't know how you missed the other questions I asked you; however, I will repost them: (1) Show us where Trump advocated violence against protesters. (2) As far as the criminals go, are you advocating that we just let them loot, vandalize, set fires, and assault people until they tire themselves out? (3) If not, what would you do to stop them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 Just now, whatdrought said: Where is it being denounced? If there are any protestors who aren’t looting and burning, are they still going out to the protests that are now driven by looting and burning? If so, that’s their identity. You can’t say “we’re together, but only have of our group are anarchists.” its being denounced by anyone with a non criminal mentality now YOU are being obtuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 3 minutes ago, Margarita said: you assume that looters and criminal actions aren't being renounced, especially by "liberals"....wrong. and I disagree with your generalized statement " know that their entire movement is now defined by the looting and pillaging." Wrong again. death penalty for looting....Gotcha. Renounced? What trains a dog better? Wagging your finger and saying “bad dog” or whacking him in the nose with a rolled up newsy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muppy Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said: Really reaching there. That is all you got after going on about people in this thread advocating violence against protesters? BTW, I don't know how you missed the other questions I asked you; however, I will repost them: (1) Show us where Trump advocated violence against protesters. (2) As far as the criminals go, are you advocating that we just let them loot, vandalize, set fires, and assault people until they tire themselves out? (3) If not, what would you do to stop them? This is my last post for now rejoice and be glad lol. 1, His tweets 2. no 3. arrest them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 1 minute ago, Margarita said: its being denounced by anyone with a non criminal mentality now YOU are being obtuse. Great! So now any protestors left are criminals. Any protest that composed of rioting, looting, theft, vandalism, attacking bystanders, burning building and cars, etc etc. is criminal and needs to be stopped with the full weight of the law and if they refuse to disperse/they attempt to cause physical harm to the lawmen, they should be shot dead in the streets. Protests without criminal activity are absolutely fine by me and I encourage them to continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 20 hours ago, Wacka said: The wrote guy breaking windows was Amtifa. They are anarchists/cpmmunists and just want to foment unrest. This one is a perfect storm of lots of groups doing what comes naturally: --anarchists taking an excuse to do their thing --establishment left priming the pump to hurt Trump while continuing to hide Early Stage Joe --ordinary people bored out of their minds from the lockdown taking the excuse to get out and scream and yell --usual scumbags taking the opportunity to loot --rich, white snowflakes who haven't had much to be 'outraged' over recently (other than someone not wearing a mask to the supermarket), can now cry on facebook over all the 'injustice' 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 Just now, Margarita said: This is my last post for now rejoice and be glad lol. 1, His tweets 2. no 3. arrest them. 1. What tweets? Remember, Margarita, we like to be specific in our answers as it alleviates any confusion. 2. Thank God 3. And what if they resist? Honest dialogue is always welcome. However, if you prefer to twist things into what you want them to be, then maybe it should be your last post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 34 minutes ago, Margarita said: here's one. I doubt those protesting were thereto loot the white house SMH If the protesters stormed the barracade, they are no longer protesters but rioters and putting the life of the president and his family in danger, or are you ok with that? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 4 minutes ago, whatdrought said: Great! So now any protestors left are criminals. Any protest that composed of rioting, looting, theft, vandalism, attacking bystanders, burning building and cars, etc etc. is criminal and needs to be stopped with the full weight of the law and if they refuse to disperse/they attempt to cause physical harm to the lawmen, they should be shot dead in the streets. Protests without criminal activity are absolutely fine by me and I encourage them to continue. Shot dead? No! But cracking skulls? You bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: Can anyone possibly take the latest display of social unrest seriously when the ‘outraged, oppressed and aggrieved’ are making a statement by looting a case of bud light from the corner convenience store.? Way to stick it to The Man! It really shows how irrational its gotten when you're not even paying for the beer and you still get Bud Light. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Shot dead? No! But cracking skulls? You bet. Absolutely shot dead. If they resist and pose a direct threat to the lives of law enforcement? Yes. And in case you’re wondering if it could get that bad, check out Oakland, where a fed was killed last night. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted May 30, 2020 Share Posted May 30, 2020 38 minutes ago, bdutton said: Yes... Trump tweeted something that he (nor any president) should ever tweet about shooting looters. What is now common knowledge about the 'protesters' are that the vast majority are not there to protest. Minnesota governor has stated that 80 of those arrested were from out of state. These are agitators/anarchists/criminals that want nothing more than to burn *****, steal *****, and otherwise cause chaos, and when the Minnesota National Guard start shooting them they will conveniently say 'see! Trump instigated this violence!'. We will watch as CNN/ABS/NBC/NPR all give these criminals a voice to support the anti Trump narrative. Anything to get *not Trump* elected. Actually he did tweet about shooting looters. Stupid thing to tweet but in the end he's right and the left will use that to further an agenda that breeds more violence and chaos. Actually Trump never said shoot the looters, what he tweeted was once the looting starts, so does the shooting, meaning, the next step was people shooting as in one person in Minneapolis was shot and killed and 8 were shot and killed in Nashville 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts