Jump to content

Liberal Protests


B-Man

Recommended Posts

On 3/1/2020 at 10:14 AM, B-Man said:

Caught on video: Black-masked Syracuse protesters 'blocking traffic'

 

 

 

 

https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=14447

 

 

Quote

Protesters chanted, some of whom wore black masks, chanted, “No justice! No peace! No racist police!” and “SU puts the ‘S’ in White Supremacy."

 

Seriously? That's their ***** chant?

 

Anyone else notice a whole lot of white people protesting on behalf of minorities?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

Anyone else notice a whole lot of white people protesting on behalf of minorities?

https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/284875/americas-white-saviors

 

Remarkably, white liberals were the only subgroup exhibiting a pro-outgroup bias—meaning white liberals were more favorable toward nonwhites and are the only group to show this preference for group other than their own. Indeed, on average, white liberals rated ethnic and racial minority groups 13 points (or half a standard deviation) warmer than whites. As is depicted in the graph below, this disparity in feelings of warmth toward ingroup vs. outgroup is even more pronounced among whites who consider themselves “very liberal” where it widens to just under 20 points. Notably, while white liberals have consistently evinced weaker pro-ingroup biases than conservatives across time, the emergence and growth of a pro-outgroup bias is actually a very recent, and unprecedented, phenomenon.

AA2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2020 at 1:53 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

Serious question..............How can they NOT realize how childish they look ?

 

Doesn't anyone have a better idea on how they should address people who do not agree with them ?

 

 

.

looks like cult behavior to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/284875/americas-white-saviors

 

Remarkably, white liberals were the only subgroup exhibiting a pro-outgroup bias—meaning white liberals were more favorable toward nonwhites and are the only group to show this preference for group other than their own. Indeed, on average, white liberals rated ethnic and racial minority groups 13 points (or half a standard deviation) warmer than whites. As is depicted in the graph below, this disparity in feelings of warmth toward ingroup vs. outgroup is even more pronounced among whites who consider themselves “very liberal” where it widens to just under 20 points. Notably, while white liberals have consistently evinced weaker pro-ingroup biases than conservatives across time, the emergence and growth of a pro-outgroup bias is actually a very recent, and unprecedented, phenomenon.

AA2.jpg

 

Oikophobia in action.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Black Lives Matter Attack On Amy Klobuchar Was So Misguided

FTA:

Even worse, those were not just “peaceful demonstrators.” People were acting in a very aggressive manner in a spot where they shouldn’t have been. The event was canceled because the staff perceived a genuine physical threat to the candidate. If this had been a general election rally and Klobuchar had been there as the nominee with Secret Service protection, those people would have been in handcuffs and on the way to jail until everything was sorted out.

 

The only thing left to learn is how liberals will figure out a way to blame all of this on conservatives, the Tea Party or something similar. This was a liberal candidate for the Democratic nomination holding a rally for Democrats and being invaded by Black Lives Matter. And yet I can assure you, this will all turn out to be Trump’s fault because it’s 2020.

 

https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2020/03/02/amy-klobuchar-backlash-continues/

 

.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2020 at 1:53 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

Serious question..............How can they NOT realize how childish they look ?

 

Doesn't anyone have a better idea on how they should address people who do not agree with them ?

 

 

.

 

 

...they're ALWAYS right.......ask my condescending, arrogant extended family relatives.....their common line is, "let me explain this for you"......

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

And if people die from her actions?

 

Isn't this a form of biological warfare?

 

Quote

Biological weapon, also called germ weapon, any of a number of disease-producing agents—such as bacteria, viruses, rickettsiae, fungi, toxins, or other biological agents—that may be utilized as weapons against humans, animals, or plants.

 

https://www.britannica.com/technology/biological-weapon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

2009? That was entirely the failure of the previous administration. Barack Obama, praised be his glorious name, cannot accept any blame for the clearly incompetent actions of the Bush administration.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Multiple left-leaning organizations have called for governments to respond to the outbreak of the Wuhan coronavirus by mass releasing prisoners, reducing arrests, and limiting immigration enforcement.

 

The proposals from major criminal justice reform groups, in particular, push preexisting policy goals as a solution to the impending epidemic. While prisons pose a unique challenge for public health, it is unclear that such drastic measures are necessary to curtail the risk of infection.

 

The Sentencing Project, a pro-reform advocacy organization, called on public officials on Wednesday to "also prioritize the health and well-being of incarcerated people" in their responses to the virus. Nazgol Ghandnoosh, a senior research analyst with the project, said specifically that state and local governments should "release individuals who do not pose a public safety risk," including elderly prisoners, "rehabilitated individuals in prison," and those in pretrial detention—this latter population accounting for almost 500,000 people on an average day.

 

The Prison Policy Initiative on Friday published recommendations for how to aid the "justice-involved population" during the outbreak. It also called for the release of "medically fragile and older adults," citing higher rates of chronic illness among prisoners.

 

In addition, PPI called for the implementation of several of its preferred policies to lower jail admissions and reduce "jail churn," including "reclassifying misdemeanor offenses that do not threaten public safety into non-jailable offenses; using citations instead of arrests for all low-level crimes; and diverting as many people as possible … to community-based mental health and substance abuse treatment." The group also called for the elimination of parole revocations for technical violations.

 

The Center for American Progress, a major liberal think tank, argued Tuesday that the Department of Homeland Security should "suspend certain immigration enforcement practices during the coronavirus outbreak." Specifically, the group called on DHS to explicitly affirm that it would not conduct enforcement operations around hospitals, health care facilities, and other testing sites. CAP did not cite any examples of DHS engaging in such enforcement but objected to the absence of an explicit policy announcement from the department.

 

Prisons—which are densely packed and contain a large aging population—do pose a unique challenge in the face of a pandemic. But health experts have pointed to solutions besides mass release which may be worth trying first. Writing for Health Affairs, three medical experts suggested reducing arrests but also emphasized the need for better coordination and testing, which would help current prisoners without stopping the operation of the justice system altogether.

 

 

.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...