Jump to content

Liberal Protests


B-Man

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You’ve stitched together quite a patchwork of random musings and supposition here, but ultimately you just have an ugly sweater that doesn’t fit.   
 

Yes, I would assume that the riots, chop zones, death and destruction precipitated changes to the law.  We’ll gloss over the fact that many, many involved in the riots were white if it makes you feel better, but you’ve provided none of the the racially suggestive language you seem to imply is obvious. 
 

Still, your angle seems to be you have to die to be lawfully able to protect yourself while fleeing, and that’s a non-starter for me.  

 

Leh-nerd Snopes  rates your claim  “FALSE”. 

 

Just like @Chef Jim - there is no threshold that you will admit the true intentions of the law... to be expected from Trump supporters.

 

4 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


do you not know the meaning of the word unintentional?  Kind of important in your post. 

 

Who defines unintentional?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Just like @Chef Jim - there is no threshold that you will admit the true intentions of the law... to be expected from Trump supporters.

 

 

Who defines unintentional?

And you’re just like George Costanzo’s porn alter ego on Seinfeld, Buck Nekkid.  Long on flourish, short on important details. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Success will depend on a number of things, starting with getting access to the petitions in order to identify and target signers before the 30-day withdrawal period passes."

 

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-04-26/california-newsom-recall-nightmare-begins

 

So basically, let's retaliate against people who think differently than us.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

For a teacher, you have really poor reading comprehension. You make an accusation about me and I've asked several times for you to back it up... 

 

 

I am not going to go search for something that you would have deleted before challenging me. I can't believe you think I would put in the effort when you could simply delete it and then pretend it was never there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I am not going to go search for something that you would have deleted before challenging me. I can't believe you think I would put in the effort when you could simply delete it and then pretend it was never there.

 

What a liar... I have never said anything derogatory about teachers - and had I - YOU WOULD HAVE RESPONEDED then.

 

Keep lying bro - it's what the GQP does!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Just like @Chef Jim - there is no threshold that you will admit the true intentions of the law... to be expected from Trump supporters.


It’s up to you to prove your interpretation of the law to prove your point.  You have failed over and over to do so.  I’ve listed over and over the true intentions of a certain law in GA. You’re worse than a die hard Trump supporter when it comes to admitting defeat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

And you’re just like George Costanzo’s porn alter ego on Seinfeld, Buck Nekkid.  Long on flourish, short on important details. 

 

It is fun watching you guys rally and defend the dustbin of the GQP - the party that validates your racism and xenophobia and that is worth everything to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

It is fun watching you guys rally and defend the dustbin of the GQP - the party that validates your racism and xenophobia and that is worth everything to you.


We’re racists because we challenge you calling a Bill racist when you have not been able to articulate what, in fact, makes it racist?   
 

Your logic is faulty at least, dangerous at most.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

What a liar... I have never said anything derogatory about teachers - and had I - YOU WOULD HAVE RESPONEDED then.

 

Keep lying bro - it's what the GQP does!

I did respond then- why did you bold that? When did I say I did not respond then? You also say derogatory things to me all the time and I am a teacher, that is why you are a liar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo Timmy said:

I did respond then- why did you bold that? When did I say I did not respond then? You also say derogatory things to me all the time and I am a teacher, that is why you are a liar.

 

Prove it. It should be in your history from last August... that's when you said it happened.  I'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

It is fun watching you guys rally and defend the dustbin of the GQP - the party that validates your racism and xenophobia and that is worth everything to you.

You’re on to gibberish now.  The only person fixated on race in this conversation is you, Buck.  
 

I asked you for evidence, you provided conspiratorial opinions and zero.zero-zero evidence of any kind.  I asked, I waited, I was patient and to be candid, I was pretty sure you were full of shyt because if you had something, you would not have to post someone else’s opinion to prove your point.
 

Why not just send the language you feel is so obvious?  (I’ll answer here because you won’t find someone else’s opinion to post as your own—you can’t provide the language or evidence because there is none). 
 

Ironically your spin here is Q-worthy. You’re now Buck NeQQid.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You’re on to gibberish now.  The only person fixated on race in this conversation is you, Buck.  
 

I asked you for evidence, you provided conspiratorial opinions and zero.zero-zero evidence of any kind.  I asked, I waited, I was patient and to be candid, I was pretty sure you were full of shyt because if you had something, you would not have to post someone else’s opinion to prove your point.
 

Why not just send the language you feel is so obvious?  (I’ll answer here because you won’t find someone else’s opinion to post as your own—you can’t provide the language or evidence because there is none). 
 

Ironically your spin here is Q-worthy. You’re now Buck NeQQid.  

 

Let's just wait for the next plowing and revisit this conversation.  It's only a matter of time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Let's just wait for the next plowing and revisit this conversation.  It's only a matter of time.

 

Now this Buck NeQQid thing has gone to your head.  Plowing?! 
 

One last question— had Reginald Denny had the option to flee but in doing so would have maimed, injured or killed one of his attackers...as a member of the jury, would you have voted to send him to jail? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Now this Buck NeQQid thing has gone to your head.  Plowing?! 
 

One last question— had Reginald Denny had the option to flee but in doing so would have maimed, injured or killed one of his attackers...as a member of the jury, would you have voted to send him to jail? 

 

Nope.  Plenty of evidence and video of what transpired that awful day but we all know these laws are set up to protect the James Alex Fields of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-nypd-detective-suing-protester-122445566.html

 

n a video of the confrontation released by the police, the protester, Terrell Harper, was just feet from Cheung’s face as he cursed at him, punctuating his comments with racist stereotypes mocking Cheung, who is Chinese American.

In the moment, Cheung made no move to apprehend Harper, who is Black. The protest, on a chilly March evening in downtown Manhattan, continued. Harper said he returned home to Asbury Park, New Jersey, after the protest, which he said was a weekly demonstration for transgender rights and “in solidarity with end Asian hate.”

 

 interviews, Harper, 39, apologized for what he acknowledged were racist comments. He said the video had been taken out of context, and that he typically uses racist remarks as part of a broader explanatory monologue to demonstrate what racism looks and feels like.

 

what a crock of ***** excuse that guy used. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...