Doc Posted March 25, 2016 Posted March 25, 2016 They always had the right to eject a player which is why the rule is redundant and stupid. They could have ejected Norman and Beckham if they wanted to do so, but they didn't have the stones to do it. That was a clear cut case they should have tossed them. At the very least, the ref should have gone to the coach in the TV break and said "sit him for a series to cool off, or he's out for the game" That's what refs would have done 25 years ago. At the end of the day, it is their job to keep control on the field. Yep. The refs said afterwards that the NFL doesn't like them to eject players during games.
DrDawkinstein Posted March 25, 2016 Posted March 25, 2016 (edited) They always had the right to eject a player which is why the rule is redundant and stupid. They could have ejected Norman and Beckham if they wanted to do so, but they didn't have the stones to do it. That was a clear cut case they should have tossed them. At the very least, the ref should have gone to the coach in the TV break and said "sit him for a series to cool off, or he's out for the game" That's what refs would have done 25 years ago. At the end of the day, it is their job to keep control on the field. Fair enough, I get all that. My problem with the change is that now it gives the refs an excuse to fall back on. They were too chicken to toss Beckham, because back then everyone would have known it was totally up to them and their discretion. Now, they get to throw a couple flags and be like "The rule is the rule, you're gone, dont blame me". Less accountability for the refs, and more subjective calls. Not the direction the officiating needs to be going in. (edit: obviously, im talking about situations where the refs take over the game seemingly because they love the spotlight. it happened way too much last year. Id have no problem with them throwing 2 flags on Beckham/Norman and booting them since they deserved it. Those situations are rare and not what Im worried about) Edited March 25, 2016 by DrDareustein
machine gun kelly Posted March 25, 2016 Posted March 25, 2016 Sounds good man, and you make a valid point that has been getting discussed that it is as if the refs are given permission to toss someone. It just wasn't needed. Hey, though have a nice Easter Weekend with your family. Thank god the sun went down, i can finally eat a cheeseburger (yes I'm catholic)
DrDawkinstein Posted March 25, 2016 Posted March 25, 2016 Sounds good man, and you make a valid point that has been getting discussed that it is as if the refs are given permission to toss someone. It just wasn't needed. Hey, though have a nice Easter Weekend with your family. Thank god the sun went down, i can finally eat a cheeseburger (yes I'm catholic) You too! Have a great holiday!
26CornerBlitz Posted March 26, 2016 Author Posted March 26, 2016 They always had the right to eject a player which is why the rule is redundant and stupid. They could have ejected Norman and Beckham if they wanted to do so, but they didn't have the stones to do it. That was a clear cut case they should have tossed them. At the very least, the ref should have gone to the coach in the TV break and said "sit him for a series to cool off, or he's out for the game" That's what refs would have done 25 years ago. At the end of the day, it is their job to keep control on the field. They certainly should have been ejected and are still going at each other. Beckham, Norman aren't done trading barbsThe most memorable feud of 2015 has some legs and they keep on walking. Giants receiver Odell Beckham Jr. and Panthers corner Josh Norman got into a little Twitter spat on Friday.
26CornerBlitz Posted March 26, 2016 Author Posted March 26, 2016 @Hub_Arkush Even Rex & Bill Belichick agree that all plays should be reviewable. Why not change rule? http://shawurl.com/2hqz
26CornerBlitz Posted March 30, 2016 Author Posted March 30, 2016 @JohnMurphyShow New rules for kickoffs-what does #Bills ST Coach Danny Crossman think? He's in studio with us tonight 730pm
26CornerBlitz Posted March 31, 2016 Author Posted March 31, 2016 Danny Crossman: "The play can change games" (16:21)Bills special teams coordinator Danny Crossman sat down on The John Murphy Show to discuss his reaction to the new kick-off rule, the change in extra points, and the additions and subtractions to his unit this offseason.
PlayoffsPlease Posted March 31, 2016 Posted March 31, 2016 I really think the pass interference penalty is real joke. There should be two rules "intentional pass interference" at the spot of the foul like we have today and "pass interference" which is 15 yards and a first down. I hate games coming down to a referees whistle and too often PI is pretty minor with major ramifications. I agree with this. Its an obvious solution.
26CornerBlitz Posted April 1, 2016 Author Posted April 1, 2016 @mikerodak I spoke to Buffalo's Jordan Gay, the NFL's only kickoff specialist, about the new touchback rule. His thoughts: https://t.co/xyAuTIeSGx
26CornerBlitz Posted April 8, 2016 Author Posted April 8, 2016 The NFL should follow the leader in this particular area: @AP_NFL CFL expands video reviews for 2016 season https://t.co/p9vk26Eod3
26CornerBlitz Posted June 21, 2016 Author Posted June 21, 2016 @PFWeekly Report: Officiating VP held call w/ all 32 s/t coordinators about evolving kickoff changes: http://shawurl.com/2o06
26CornerBlitz Posted June 24, 2016 Author Posted June 24, 2016 @theMMQB This is how the NFL should fix its kickoff problem http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/06/24/nfl-kickoff-proposed-change-mike-westhoff-jenny-verntas-mmqb-10-things-i-think-i-think
26CornerBlitz Posted July 14, 2016 Author Posted July 14, 2016 @SiriusXMNFL NEW at SiriusXM NFL Blog: Blandindo: #NFL officials getting a better handle on catch-no catch https://goo.gl/HtqD7q
26CornerBlitz Posted August 11, 2016 Author Posted August 11, 2016 @NFLFootballOps Officials will emphasize penalizing coaches who enter field of play in the 2016 @NFL season: http://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/rules-changes-and-points-of-emphasis-for-2016/
26CornerBlitz Posted August 11, 2016 Author Posted August 11, 2016 @mikejurecki .@NFL 2016 Schedule of Fine$
KD in CA Posted August 11, 2016 Posted August 11, 2016 @mikejurecki .@NFL 2016 Schedule of Fine$ By the way, whatever happened with the two idiots from the Bengals who blew that playoff game? Did either of them get suspended?
BaaadThingsMan Posted August 11, 2016 Posted August 11, 2016 This whole "Ejection after 2nd Unsportsmanlike" rule is complete BS. Another way for the league to give ultimate power to the refs to subjectively decide games. As noted in a previous post, only 1 player had 2 in a game last year so why do they think it's an issue? Next time they flag Hughes for congratulating his own teammate, fans should rush the f%&$ing field. OBJ rule
KD in CA Posted August 11, 2016 Posted August 11, 2016 OBJ rule I recall a lot of people whining about Talib in the Super Bowl too.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 11, 2016 Posted August 11, 2016 @RapSheet Competition Committee will meet next week & vote on several new rules adjustments at the league meetings. A look at some key changes coming… Comp. Committee expected to pass a rule making ejections automatic after 2 personal fouls. Must decide which penalties (fewer than 5) apply Comp. Committee will tweak language on the chop block rule & the horse collar rule (i.e. grabbing the back of a nameplate) for added safety Teams will submit proposals, but there isn't expected to be much change to what plays are reviewable. Too many unintended consequences Finally, the catch rule won't change, either, which was expected. But the public education of the catch rule & how its officiated continues There is no clear definition of a catch.
Recommended Posts