CommonCents Posted March 14, 2016 Posted March 14, 2016 Find a safety that plays down downhill like TJ Ward and the patriots WR's aren't so productive. Draft Jeremy Cash!!!!
Doc Posted March 14, 2016 Posted March 14, 2016 Even better. Makes it so you don't have to have HOF WR's on the roster to succeed. Gronk is more valuable to that team than would be a Julio Jones or Megatron. Their success is proof of this, unless you think they would have won every SB in the past 5 years with one of those guys on the roster. You also don't need a HOF TE to succeed. Not sure what point you're trying to make here. Yes but NE is doing just fine year after year with the guys BB brings in to supplement Gronk, which is the point here. Criticizing him for not bringing a marquee WR is not a meaningful criticism. Again, how do you think BB will do after Brady is gone? Do you still see them doing fine on offense?
YoloinOhio Posted March 15, 2016 Author Posted March 15, 2016 PFF not kind in its grade for the Hogan signing https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2016/03/10/pro-nfl-free-agency-grading-every-deal/
26CornerBlitz Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 WR Greg Salas ready to fill a role With Chris Hogan signing an offer sheet in New England, there is a void to be filled in Buffalo's receiving corps and Greg Salas might be the best fit.
CSBill Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 WR Greg Salas ready to fill a role he did look good in that last game
Mr. WEO Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 I was just responding to the point of having an elite TE was "even better." They are even better because they are harder to find. There are a lot of great WR in the NFL right now. We have one of them. There are not a lot of great TEs. I agree. You also don't need a HOF TE to succeed. Not sure what point you're trying to make here. Again, how do you think BB will do after Brady is gone? Do you still see them doing fine on offense? You don't need a HOF TE to succeed, but BB picked one. And because of that and his pick of Brady, he was able to create an offense where he doesn't need to pick great WR draft picks, which is the point being discussed here doc. How will BB do without Brady? My guess is no worse than Lombardi after Starr, Levy after Kelly, Landry after Staubach, Noll after Bradshaw....you knew this before you asked the question.
BarleyNY Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 PFF not kind in its grade for the Hogan signing https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2016/03/10/pro-nfl-free-agency-grading-every-deal/ Cruel, but fair.
Doc Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 You don't need a HOF TE to succeed, but BB picked one. And because of that and his pick of Brady, he was able to create an offense where he doesn't need to pick great WR draft picks, which is the point being discussed here doc. How will BB do without Brady? My guess is no worse than Lombardi after Starr, Levy after Kelly, Landry after Staubach, Noll after Bradshaw....you knew this before you asked the question. So IOW, you need luck to draft a HOF QB? Okay, just checking.
Mr. WEO Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 So IOW, you need luck to draft a HOF QB? Okay, just checking. Actually, BB "developed" Brady behind Blesoe. It's not luck. He did exactly what the OP would want all teams to do. But anyway, what was your point about HOF HCs success after their HOF QBs move on?
Deranged Rhino Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Actually, BB "developed" Brady behind Blesoe. It's not luck. He did exactly what the OP would want all teams to do. But anyway, what was your point about HOF HCs success after their HOF QBs move on? TIL "Developing a QB" means cheating and keeping the helmet mics on longer than you're supposed to so you can point out the coverages to your young QB.
Doc Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Actually, BB "developed" Brady behind Blesoe. It's not luck. He did exactly what the OP would want all teams to do. But anyway, what was your point about HOF HCs success after their HOF QBs move on? LOL! No, he didn't develop Brady, just like he hasn't developed any other QB that they've drafted since then (and likewise won't be able to develop Garroppolllooo either, despite being the highest pick he's spent on a QB). And you know what my point it. Suffice it to say it's not as simple as "you don't need HOF WR's or TE's."
Mr. WEO Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 LOL! No, he didn't develop Brady, just like he hasn't developed any other QB that they've drafted since then (and likewise won't be able to develop Garroppolllooo either, despite being the highest pick he's spent on a QB). And you know what my point it. Suffice it to say it's not as simple as "you don't need HOF WR's or TE's." How didn't he? Brady was the fully formed HOF sitting on the bench?
FireChan Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 LOL! No, he didn't develop Brady, just like he hasn't developed any other QB that they've drafted since then (and likewise won't be able to develop Garroppolllooo either, despite being the highest pick he's spent on a QB). And you know what my point it. Suffice it to say it's not as simple as "you don't need HOF WR's or TE's." How did he not develop Brady? Who has developed a QB if BB didn't for Brady?
Doc Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 How didn't he? Brady was the fully formed HOF sitting on the bench? I know because he's drafted a dozen QB's since Brady, many of them in higher rounds, and none of them have developed anywhere close to Brady. And the idea that BB developed him while he was a 4th stinger as a rookie is silly.
FireChan Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 I know because he's drafted a dozen QB's since Brady, many of them in higher rounds, and none of them have developed anywhere close to Brady. And the idea that BB developed him while he was a 4th stinger as a rookie is silly. So what? Maybe they just sucked. Your logic is faulty.
Mr. WEO Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 I know because he's drafted a dozen QB's since Brady, many of them in higher rounds, and none of them have developed anywhere close to Brady. And the idea that BB developed him while he was a 4th stinger as a rookie is silly. Wow...
Doc Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 So what? Maybe they just sucked. Your logic is faulty. LOL! No, the faulty logic is claiming A developed B but couldn't develop C-M, much less because "they just sucked." Logic would be to say Dick Rehbein, his QB coach, developed him, or even Charlie Weis, who was his OC.
Maury Ballstein Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Why didn't BB make Rohan Davey a HOF'r. Brady would be good anywhere. His accuracy is moneybags McGee
Recommended Posts