C.Biscuit97 Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 I would not even bother but for the fact that the Rex Haters seem to be the "loudest" on this board. It is funny how you guys continue to defend Mario. As an aside, I was once as big of a defender of Mario (and St. Doug for that matter) as one could be. Both those guys are quitters and we are better off without them. On the other hand, Rex and his family have embraced Buffalo . . . and yet, there are those who want to run him out of town . . . and after one year at that. Speaking for myself, I don't want to ruin Rex out of town. I'm fine with giving him another year. But to act like this year was a giant disappointment is just wrong. Our defense across the board completely sucked compared to last year. And it wasn't just Mario. And it's cool Rex likes Buffalo but that's not a reason I'd mention for keeping him as a pro coach. Losman cleaned up Buffalo. Mario was shoveling people out of the snow last November. It doesn't matter if you're not producing.
yungmack Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 Losing him doesn't make us worse either. Bad system fit. It makes sense that he and Leo would go to Schwartz. Good fit there. "Bad system fit" is another way of saying Rex sux.
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 (edited) He is miraculously going to turn into a good player again. Love revamping a top 4 defense 2 years later! when you think about it how would we have kept the D anyways? It's likely Mario, Leodis, and Bradham are still gone this year. Lost other starters from that D last year also. Defense was getting revamped anyway. To be honest i'de rather have Rex Ryan revamping the defense. Edited March 10, 2016 by TheTruthHurts
26CornerBlitz Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 @alexmarvez Nigel Bradham says @Browns, @TBBuccaneers & @Jaguars showed interest. @buffalobills backed out of contract talks. Can't wait to play them
zevo Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 @alexmarvez Nigel Bradham says @Browns, @TBBuccaneers & @Jaguars showed interest. @buffalobills backed out of contract talks. Can't wait to play them Do we even play them anytime soon?
26CornerBlitz Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 @SiriusXMNFL .@NigelBradham_13 on playing under Jim Schwartz: he just lets you play football, its an aggressive style, that makes the game fun @Eagles .@NigelBradham_13 on the issues w the @buffalobills defense last yr: its just came down to the fact that the personnel didn't fit the scheme
vincec Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 Losing him doesn't make us worse either. Bad system fit. It makes sense that he and Leo would go to Schwartz. Good fit there. I think they should have kept McKelvin personally. I though he played pretty well under Pettine two years ago and would have been a very solid #3 CB. I don't think that he needs Schwartz's system to succeed the way Bradham appears to. Plus I really liked the guy. But you can't keep everyone I guess.
youngjebrey Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 Do we even play them anytime soon? We play them in like 4-5 years. He signed a 2 year contract lol
jr1 Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 Jim Schwartz was plotting revenge like Dr. Claw from Inspector Gadget
Dragonborn10 Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 Bradham had 12 maybe 14 good games. He was bad last year even before he got hurt. Should not be too difficult to replace.
vincec Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 Bradham had 12 maybe 14 good games. He was bad last year even before he got hurt. Should not be too difficult to replace. To be honest, you could easily wonder if his one good season under Schwartz was just an anomaly and not the perfect system fit that some people think. He was playing behind the best front 4 in the NFL that season so I'm sure that helped a lot.
Saxum Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 Do we even play them anytime soon? Four year rotation and he signed a two year contract; he will be free agent when Eagles play Bills next.
Dragonborn10 Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 To be honest, you could easily wonder if his one good season under Schwartz was just an anomaly and not the perfect system fit that some people think. He was playing behind the best front 4 in the NFL that season so I'm sure that helped a lot. Agreed
Mark Vader Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 Do we even play them anytime soon? nope We play them in like 4-5 years. He signed a 2 year contract lol Four year rotation and he signed a two year contract; he will be free agent when Eagles play Bills next. Unless we meet in the Super Bowl in the next 2 years.
Freddie's Dead Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 This sucks. No more XTC references for me. Bradham was a badass. Interesting how many Bills D players are a "bad system fit" with Wrex.
YoloinOhio Posted March 10, 2016 Author Posted March 10, 2016 This sucks. No more XTC references for me. Bradham was a badass. Interesting how many Bills D players are a "bad system fit" with Wrex. how many? i count 1. Bradham.
The Big Cat Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 I was told schemes are lousy if you have to bring in your old players to run it right.
Peter Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 @SiriusXMNFL .@NigelBradham_13 on playing under Jim Schwartz: he just lets you play football, its an aggressive style, that makes the game fun @Eagles .@NigelBradham_13 on the issues w the @buffalobills defense last yr: its just came down to the fact that the personnel didn't fit the scheme Well, I guess "personnel not fitting the scheme" explains Nigel's missed tackle against the Giants . . . .
Recommended Posts