Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Tough to argue with an idealist.

 

You're absolutely correct. But you're an idealist. :flirt:

 

There is nothing idealist about what Thurmanator wants. Nothing. He just wants to NFL to reflect the reality of the 21st century and if we take your view that "oh well it is just part of the ritual humiliation" and expect that nobody should expose that is should stay behind the cloak or respectability that these teams try and pull off the we will never drag the NFL forward.

 

IT's a totally unacceptable question. If someone asked it to me in a job interview - indeed if someone asked me the question you say that you were asked in a job interview I would immediately terminate the interview.

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

 

There is nothing idealist about what Thurmanator wants. Nothing. He just wants to NFL to reflect the reality of the 21st century and if we take your view that "oh well it is just part of the ritual humiliation" and expect that nobody should expose that is should stay behind the cloak or respectability that these teams try and pull off the we will never drag the NFL forward.

 

IT's a totally unacceptable question. If someone asked it to me in a job interview - indeed if someone asked me the question you say that you were asked in a job interview I would immediately terminate the interview.

whose reality?

 

I stopped reading after that. I had to go back to my safe space.

Edited by Boyst62
Posted

whose reality?

 

I stopped reading after that. I had to go back to my safe space.

 

The reality that we live in where homosexual people in most of the western world have absolutely equal rights in law to heterosexual people and therefore the question of one's sexuality is entirely irrelevant to one's employment.

 

You might not like that reality.... but that is the reality so go back to your safe place where you can believe whatever you like.

Posted

 

The reality that we live in where homosexual people in most of the western world have absolutely equal rights in law to heterosexual people and therefore the question of one's sexuality is entirely irrelevant to one's employment.

 

You might not like that reality.... but that is the reality so go back to your safe place where you can believe whatever you like.

 

I guess then you just invalidate all the points made in this thread about the NFL NOT being of the same standards for the rest of the "western world."

Posted (edited)

Me think we are getting too political here. We are talking football. Sure can tell when things get slow during the season. I want to know if they signed Richie yet. Thats important. Makes me laugh you guys. The only gay on our team is Gay and he just got married. Borned with the name and he made out fine. Not a bad kicker either.

Edited by Direhard Fan
Posted

 

The reality that we live in where homosexual people in most of the western world have absolutely equal rights in law to heterosexual people and therefore the question of one's sexuality is entirely irrelevant to one's employment.

 

You might not like that reality.... but that is the reality so go back to your safe place where you can believe whatever you like.

would you be equally mad if they asked him if he was married or had a girlfriend? would you be upset if they asked him if he watched squat cobbler videos? at what point do your beliefs of ones right determine what is or is not appropriate?

 

are you going to say it is a microaggression to ask a man or woman if they are married? have a husband or wife? a girlfriend or boyfriend? would you be upset if they asked him if he watched porn?

 

would you be upset if they asked if he went to Church or Temple? would that not be prejudicial to assume he was a specific religion?

 

what about if they asked if he smoked weed? pew research says 49% of americans have smoked it. i'd bet it is higher among those >40 than over, but would you be upset? would it be a microaggression that since apple is a black man?

 

what about if he watched Jersey Shore or HGTV? he grew up in a fairly upper middle class community in Jersey.

 

that many here take one specific question and go at it gun-ho is extremely odd. appropriate or not - that's not an argument anyone is continuing to make. there are two arguments - he made a mistake disclosing the question to the public, and that the question is getting the attention it is.

 

i have yet to hear a valid response from you or anyone saying the question was outlandish about why exactly it was outlandish compared to what is going on and the history of the event.

Posted

 

The reality that we live in where homosexual people in most of the western world have absolutely equal rights in law to heterosexual people and therefore the question of one's sexuality is entirely irrelevant to one's employment.

 

You might not like that reality.... but that is the reality so go back to your safe place where you can believe whatever you like.

100% Agree. Some people just don't get it and never will, save your breath. If being an idealist is defined as being someone who wants to correct things that are clearly wrong, then sign me up.

 

"The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of moral crisis preserve their neutrality." Dante

Posted (edited)

 

I guess then you just invalidate all the points made in this thread about the NFL NOT being of the same standards for the rest of the "western world."

 

The law applies to the NFL as well and the NFL's reaction illustrates that the league understands this.

Edited by GunnerBill
Posted

I thought you were an idiot that was full of crap, but then you used the word "whilst", and I thought "This guy is pretty sharp!"

once i awhile he shows up with his thesaurus and an attitude.

alway a pleasure for me actually.

i also in possession of these tools of effective elocution.

But perhaps I am not one to bandy it about over such persnickety matters of irrelevance though.

Fire up the outrage machine!

 

SJWs....Mount Up!

giddy up !

Posted (edited)

would you be equally mad if they asked him if he was married or had a girlfriend? would you be upset if they asked him if he watched squat cobbler videos? at what point do your beliefs of ones right determine what is or is not appropriate?

 

are you going to say it is a microaggression to ask a man or woman if they are married? have a husband or wife? a girlfriend or boyfriend? would you be upset if they asked him if he watched porn?

 

YES. None of those questions are appropriate to ask in an interview.

 

would you be upset if they asked if he went to Church or Temple? would that not be prejudicial to assume he was a specific religion?

 

YES. See above.

 

what about if they asked if he smoked weed? pew research says 49% of americans have smoked it. i'd bet it is higher among those >40 than over, but would you be upset? would it be a microaggression that since apple is a black man?

 

No . This is obviously different. Smoking weed is a breach of the NFL's rules and is actually illegal. That is not the same as asking about someone's religion or sexuality in any way.

 

what about if he watched Jersey Shore or HGTV? he grew up in a fairly upper middle class community in Jersey.

 

I think this is inappropriate but not in such a way that may lead to prejudice so if they want to ask it fine... but I still wouldn't answer it in the player's position.

 

 

 

Honestly I know our countries are two cultures with a shared language but the idea in Britain that you would or could ask someone about their sexuality, relationship status or religion in a job interview would leave most incredulous. Our law contains significantly stronger restrictions on that than I understand apply in America.

Edited by GunnerBill
Posted

Gunner Bill. You have/had a title that trained your mindset..

HR is a very different animal than say military boot camp.

I appreciate your value system without question.

But the kid was just a kid who got beat by the question perhaps.

Looking at the context of how he revealed himself seemed casual enough.

You know as well as i even in the professional world , one needs to work through irregularities in conduct.

 

I think this is much ado about nothing. a footnote perhaps.

Posted (edited)

Gunner Bill. You have/had a title that trained your mindset..

HR is a very different animal than say military boot camp.

I appreciate your value system without question.

But the kid was just a kid who got beat by the question perhaps.

Looking at the context of how he revealed himself seemed casual enough.

You know as well as i even in the professional world , one needs to work through irregularities in conduct.

 

I think this is much ado about nothing. a footnote perhaps.

 

I have nothing to do with HR. I've worked in 3 different professional fields and I have been a successful semi-pro sports coach. In none of those contexts are those questions appropriate and over here in our great United Kingdom I could even get in trouble for asking them.

Edited by GunnerBill
Posted

 

I have nothing to do with HR. I've worked in 3 different professional fields and I have been a successful semi-pro sports coach. In none of those contexts are those questions appropriate and over here in our great United Kingdom I could even get in trouble for asking them.

I apologise, i had you mixed up with Machine Gun Kelly. no insult to either i hope!

Posted

 

would you be equally mad if they asked him if he was married or had a girlfriend? would you be upset if they asked him if he watched squat cobbler videos? at what point do your beliefs of ones right determine what is or is not appropriate?

 

are you going to say it is a microaggression to ask a man or woman if they are married? have a husband or wife? a girlfriend or boyfriend? would you be upset if they asked him if he watched porn?

 

YES. None of those questions are appropriate to ask in an interview.

 

would you be upset if they asked if he went to Church or Temple? would that not be prejudicial to assume he was a specific religion?

 

YES. See above.

 

what about if they asked if he smoked weed? pew research says 49% of americans have smoked it. i'd bet it is higher among those >40 than over, but would you be upset? would it be a microaggression that since apple is a black man?

 

No . This is obviously different. Smoking weed is a breach of the NFL's rules and is actually illegal. That is not the same as asking about someone's religion or sexuality in any way.

 

what about if he watched Jersey Shore or HGTV? he grew up in a fairly upper middle class community in Jersey.

 

I think this is inappropriate but not in such a way that may lead to prejudice so if they want to ask it fine... but I still wouldn't answer it in their position.

 

 

 

alright next step.

 

is it appropriate to ask an interviewee which team they pick in Madden and why?

 

What about what was your family life like and what did your parents do for a living? this is my favorite. see, this. they asked Dez bryant this and he said his dad was a pimp. when asked what his mom did and bryant replied he worked for my dad...well, ireland asked if his mom was a prostitute. of course that takes sensational headlines to think it went otherwise, which most did. but hey, i bet a lot of teams saw that bryant was as unstable as he has proven in the interviews. and is that so bad? the guy has been a nut, a freaking nut.

 

in fact, click on the link above. all those questions seem to be fine. but with todays PC police and sjw's ... don't ever talk about being a homosexual or of another race.

 

also read THIS.

 

again, how are any of those questions legal? this stuff is out there every year and now we're suddenly some advanced culture that doesn't accept that. but look at those articles and go back 20 years to where Manning was at University of Teabagessee. This has been par for the course for a long time and you mean to tell me no one has sued yet? no one has been sad or cried?

Posted

 

Which law was violated?

 

There was no direct legal infraction under US Federal law insofar as I understand it but we all have the same rights.... that isn't just a value it is underpinned and recognised by law. The NFL is bound to feel very nervous about any inference that one might be prejudiced in one's employability.

Posted

alright next step.

 

is it appropriate to ask an interviewee which team they pick in Madden and why?

 

What about what was your family life like and what did your parents do for a living? this is my favorite. see, this. they asked Dez bryant this and he said his dad was a pimp. when asked what his mom did and bryant replied he worked for my dad...well, ireland asked if his mom was a prostitute. of course that takes sensational headlines to think it went otherwise, which most did. but hey, i bet a lot of teams saw that bryant was as unstable as he has proven in the interviews. and is that so bad? the guy has been a nut, a freaking nut.

 

in fact, click on the link above. all those questions seem to be fine. but with todays PC police and sjw's ... don't ever talk about being a homosexual or of another race.

 

also read THIS.

 

again, how are any of those questions legal? this stuff is out there every year and now we're suddenly some advanced culture that doesn't accept that. but look at those articles and go back 20 years to where Manning was at University of Teabagessee. This has been par for the course for a long time and you mean to tell me no one has sued yet? no one has been sad or cried?

Whoa. Did the dirty birds really ask Apple if he was black?!?!? That's completely unacceptable, in my opinion.

Posted

Whoa. Did the dirty birds really ask Apple if he was black?!?!? That's completely unacceptable, in my opinion.

apple answered he was born with the identity of black male but prefers to be known as the pollenator of aesculus glabra.

×
×
  • Create New...