Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

@tydunne

The #Bills have also announced that Leodis McKelvin and Corey Graham could have restructured deals, too.

 

"Could have"?

 

@mikerodak

Funny thing about Clay deal was Bills structured contract so Dolphins would take big hit in 2016. Bills easily got out of own hole with him.

Edited by YoloinOhio
Posted

yup. This had restructure written all over it when it went down last year IMO

 

With a $10M roster bonus due this year, definitely.

Posted (edited)

"Could have"?

@mikerodak

Funny thing about Clay deal was Bills structured contract so Dolphins would take big hit in 2016. Bills easily got out of own hole with him.

 

I totally disagree here with this tweet. This opens up all possibilities of disaster with the skyrocketed dead money involved now. Clay is a MAJOR risk on the future of the club with his reliability (has only played one healthy season) and chronic knee problems with the restructure.

Edited by BuffaloBillsForever
Posted

@tydunne

The #Bills have also announced that Leodis McKelvin and Corey Graham could have restructured deals, too.

"Could have"?@mikerodak

Funny thing about Clay deal was Bills structured contract so Dolphins would take big hit in 2016. Bills easily got out of own hole with him.

Nothing funny about it. The deal was set up to be restructured. Whether or not the $10M cash payment is a roster or signing bonus is meaningless to Clay, but how it is allocated for a cap perspective is very different. It was nearly impossible for Miami to match that contract.

Posted

 

I totally disagree here with this tweet. This opens up all possibilities of disaster with the skyrocketed dead money involved now. Clay is a MAJOR risk on the future of the club with his reliability (has only played one healthy season) and chronic knee problems with the restructure.

Really makes you wonder why he was a top 100 player just the year before last?

Posted

 

I totally disagree here with this tweet. This opens up all possibilities of disaster with the skyrocketed dead money involved now. Clay is a MAJOR risk on the future of the club with his reliability (has only played one healthy season) and chronic knee problems with the restructure.

It's a terrible contract. The structure made a lot of sense technically, but it is stupid from an overpayment perspective.

Posted (edited)

 

@JoeBuscaglia

Wrote this last month in the offseason blueprint column. Potential Clay restructure fully explained:

CcGaTfwW4AE3QuW.jpg

 

 

 

It's not fully explained as it misses the most important thing and that is the rising dead money involved. Clay is a major injury risk and even his own doctors in Miami have questioned his longevity. That is were the potential ramifications of the dead money come in play.

Edited by BuffaloBillsForever
Posted

I always find it funny when guys act like the money is coming out of our pockets. Don't worry about it, let the pros crunch the numbers and sign the papers.

Posted

 

 

It's not fully explained as it misses the most important thing and that is the rising dead money involved. Clay is a major injury risk and even his own doctors in Miami have questioned his longevity. That is were the potential ramifications of the dead money come in.

 

Sour grapes perhaps. We'll see, but they have to make room to get the left side of the OL secured and this is a prelude to accomplishing that.

Posted

 

So Clay staying healthy ONCE in his career is sour grapes?

 

Questioning his longevity after he left for Buffalo could be sour grapes because they wanted to retain him.

Posted

It's obvious we don't know all of the information coming down over the next few years as most teams probably have a rough guess with different streams of revenue what may happen down the road projecting likely rises in the cap. It's like anything else in business, it's a forecast, so is only so accurate.

 

With that said, are these restructured deals kicking down the road dead money, and place us in a difficult situation when we do need to pay for a franchise QB. We have to hope they know what they are doing, and keep building through the draft.

 

The Bills will have the money they need to resign, but will not pay for any large free agent contracts.

Posted

 

 

It's not fully explained as it misses the most important thing and that is the rising dead money involved. Clay is a major injury risk and even his own doctors in Miami have questioned his longevity. That is were the potential ramifications of the dead money come in play.

We weren't cutting him this year or next no matter what. This just confirms the year after- not that radical.

×
×
  • Create New...