Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Whoops. “Wonderful human being” and “good friend.”

 

 

 

 

 


Why did the Trump campaign plagiarize her speech for Epstein’s girl Melania?  

Posted
14 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Why did the Trump campaign plagiarize her speech for Epstein’s girl Melania?  

Why not??? Joe Biden said it was the norm in Washington. He should know.

Posted

I JUST ASSUMED THEY WERE ALL HANDED OVER TO ANTIFA AND BLM IN JANUARY, 2017. 

 

Where are all the guns and ammo purchased under Obama? 

 

During the last two years of the Obama administration, some unusual purchases were made. Large quantities of ammunition were purchased, as were firearms, mostly for somewhat obscure agencies or agencies with no real need for such weaponry.

 

Estimates are that over 1 billion rounds of ammunition were ordered, which resulted in making ammunition scarce for the normal civilian market.”

 
 
 
 
 
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/18/2020 at 10:56 AM, B-Man said:

Obama: 'I Make Love to Men Daily'

by Jack Cashill

 

Original Article

 

In composing my new book, Unmasking Obama: The Fight to Tell the True Story of a Failed Presidency, I thought hard about whether I should address the question of Barack Obama's sexuality.

 

Two considerations persuaded me to pursue the issue. One was the no-holds-barred media treatment of the sex life, real and imagined, of Donald Trump and Brett Kavanaugh.

 

The second was the fact that despite Obama's early feint to the center, his presidency was something of a golden age for gay America. A May 2012 Newsweek cover story, in fact, dubbed Obama "the first gay president."

 

 

 

 

Of course he does, the Ayatollah married a man

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 years later...
Posted

 

 

A Non-Pretending Discussion About Barack Obama

 

FTA:

 

The type of intense, deeply cited and granular research that David Garrow did for his book, is the type of research historians 50-years from now will be citing as they outline the legacy of President Obama.  This is also the type of research and non-pretending analysis you will never see approved for conversation by those who currently maintain the false pretense of the subject.

 

“I doubt that in the long run, Obama’s foreign-policy failures are going to be seen as the most important part of his legacy. I think future historians are going to look at the Obama presidency and see it as the moment when this new oligarchy merged with the Democratic Party and used the capacities of these new technologies and the power of this new class of people, the oligarchs and their servants, to create a new apparatus of social control. How far they can go with it, what the limits are … you see them trying to test it out every week or so.”  ~ David Samuels

 

 

Garrow and Samuels both discuss Barack Obama in a way that is extremely accurate; as a result, antithetical to the populism that surrounds the former President.  People who have followed political events will bathe in the truthfulness of the discussion.  Obama, a man created by his own intent and purpose, to present himself and his transitional identity to a select audience of affluent white liberals.  This audience would help Obama achieve his narcissistic life goal to have a “valet and private plane”, while simultaneously assuaging their white guilt.  The plan worked swimmingly.

 

Samuels talks about the curiosity of President Obama maintaining his residence in the nation’s capital, an often-visited command center in Washington DC, where important members of the current administration assemble at times, and secret service vehicles are often spotted coming and going. Yet, for some odd reason, the DC media network who are directly responsible for tracking and outlining the comings and goings of those in power, are seemingly incurious about this home/headquarters.

 

[…] Samuels: “The easy explanation, of course, is that Joe Biden is not running that part of his administration. Obama is. He doesn’t even have to pick up the phone because all of his people are already inside the White House. They hold the Iran file. Tony Blinken doesn’t.”

 

{snip}

 

I am going to draw attention to one such example, because this is the first time I have seen anyone, other than myself, connect the dots of the new surveillance state to the intents and purposes of Obama’s tenure in office.   As noted during the conversation, David Samuels says…

 

….”So Obama starts out as an eloquent opponent of the Patriot Act, etc., etc. By the end of his presidency, his people are unmasking intercepts of his political opponents every day, and the FBI is spying on Donald Trump.”… 

 

The response from Garrow is as succinct as it is accurate, “that’s right!”

 

I cannot tell you how refreshing it is to see an article that drops all of the pretending and starts to talk about the reality of our situation.  If we stop pretending we unite as a country, because we all start to accept the same baselines.

 

The fraud that has been purposefully deployed as a tool for fundamental change, can only exist if people pretend that fraud and corruption does not exist.  Stop pretending, and the sunlight of commonality begins to unite our nation.

 

This weaponized national security state will be the legacy of President Obama.

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/08/04/a-non-pretending-discussion-about-barack-obama/

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...