Chef Jim Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 One of my über liberal Facebook friends posted this: It's generally not nice to be happy when somebody croaks, but... Stay classy Libs.
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 (edited) Activist like overturning hugely ....actually almost unamimous.... bipartison legislation like campaign finance reform and voter rights laws?That's not judicial activism. What is it, exactly, you believe the purpose of the Court is? To rubber stamp new law? The purpose of the Court is to rule on the Constitutionality of law, not the popularity of law. And Scalia was correct in his opinion on campaign finance as speech and voters rights. I'd yet to hear any logical Constitutional argument opposing. Perhaps you'll care to make one? Edited February 13, 2016 by TakeYouToTasker
TH3 Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Tell us again how you're a Republican... Tell me again how the two examples I laid out aren't clear definitions of activist judgements.....you know....when judges overturn long held legislation....legislated by 435 congressmen, 50 senators and a president overturned by 5 men......but if it fits your POV..... But continue your MO of coming up with nothing of substance....probably fits your life...
boyst Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Tell me again how the two examples I laid out aren't clear definitions of activist judgements.....you know....when judges overturn long held legislation....legislated by 435 congressmen, 50 senators and a president overturned by 5 men......but if it fits your POV..... But continue your MO of coming up with nothing of substance....probably fits your life... you made the statement. Tommy asked you initially to support your statement. clearly, you cannot. and as such, you cannot ask a question in return.. tom owned you.
Chef Jim Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 you made the statement. Tommy asked you initially to support your statement. clearly, you cannot. and as such, you cannot ask a question in return.. tom owned you. I think in order to own him Tom asked the wrong question. I think Tasker's question created more ownership.
....lybob Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 I think they should wait until President Sanders and the new Senate take office to fill the vacancy, Obama would probably try to get some type of moderate appointed, he's weak like that.
Chef Jim Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 I think they should wait until President Sanders and the new Senate take office to fill the vacancy, Obama would probably try to get some type of moderate appointed, he's weak like that. Who is they?
boyst Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 I think in order to own him Tom asked the wrong question. I think Tasker's question created more ownership. i usually don't read Taskers posts. they're usually stupid. he quoted tom, i went with that.
....lybob Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Who is they? The Senate, they should block the Obama appointee
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 you made the statement. Tommy asked you initially to support your statement. clearly, you cannot. and as such, you cannot ask a question in return.. tom owned you. What's your point? You are here just to cheerlead for a certain poster?
Chef Jim Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 The Senate, they should block the Obama appointee What type of Judge do you thing a President Sanders would appoint and why would he/she be good for the country?
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 You can just as easily say Sacilia was against free speech by shooting down the campaign finance law. Screaming so no one else can be heard is just as much against freedom as a censorship by the government. But agains, all the money did not help Bush or Clinton this time. Totally new media environment I can't wait to hear who Trump would nominate. Obama's nominee will be interesting. Maybe another women? Makes it harder to attack her I think. What type of Judge do you thing a President Sanders would appoint and why would he/she be good for the country? Two second question looking for a 5 minute answer?
boyst Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 What's your point? You are here just to cheerlead for a certain poster? yes. i have pom poms and a skirt, too.
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 You can just as easily say Sacilia was against free speech by shooting down the campaign finance law. Screaming so no one else can be heard is just as much against freedom as a censorship by the government. But agains, all the money did not help Bush or Clinton this time. Totally new media environment I can't wait to hear who Trump would nominate. Obama's nominee will be interesting. Maybe another women? Makes it harder to attack her I think. Two second question looking for a 5 minute answer? Radio, television, and print adds are hardly "screaming to drown out others". Further, one purchasing such a medium for their speech does not prohibit anyone else from from doing exactly the same thing. We all have the equal right to speak. Campaign finance laws simply serve to censor political speech that the left doesn't like.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Radio, television, and print adds are hardly "screaming to drown out others". Further, one purchasing such a medium for their speech does not prohibit anyone else from from doing exactly the same thing. We all have the equal right to speak. Campaign finance laws simply serve to censor political speech that the left doesn't like. If one side can buy up all the air waves in a local or regional market its just a silly and large advantages and serves the interests of the powerful few
....lybob Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 What type of Judge do you thing a President Sanders would appoint and why would he/she be good for the country? a great one,
Chef Jim Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Two second question looking for a 5 minute answer? Five minutes, three minutes, what we've it takes. Logical question asked of someone who would wish Sanders to nominate the next Justice don't you think? a great one, What would make him or her great? I can play this game all night if you want.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Five minutes, three minutes, what we've it takes. Logical question asked of someone who would wish Sanders to nominate the next Justice don't you think? No its lazy. Take time to state your opinion. No one wants to waste five minutes of their life answering just to find another question afterwards
Recommended Posts