Tiberius Posted February 22, 2016 Author Share Posted February 22, 2016 Actually, yes she does. She's advocated multiple times that parental discipline and parent-child disputes should be a matter for the courts, and said that the traditional family structure is equivalent to slavery. What, like child abuse or does she want the courts to decide if the kid gets a new xbox for Christmas or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 What, like child abuse or does she want the courts to decide if the kid gets a new xbox for Christmas or not? Can raising a child in a household of two (or even one) able bodied parent that chooses not to work because they don't have to in order to survive be considered child abuse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 22, 2016 Author Share Posted February 22, 2016 Well not everyone wins the uterine lottery now do they. Life sucks sometimes. Wouldn't this fall under child endangerment? Take the kids away if they can't properly provide for them. There are plenty of well to do couples (gays, lesbians perhaps) that cannot have kids that would love to raise them properly. I'd rather hand out welfare checks than have the state confiscating children. And there are not enough people willing to take children. It is a hassle and all the raise someone's kid ya know 1. They can't do what job well? What job are you talking about. There are plenty of jobs that take no or little skill or a skill that can be taught and learned. 2 So there is no repercussions for ruining your child's opportunity for a quality life? As you said, it's not the child's fault right 3. See it's not that hard is it. 1) They can't be good administrators or something. No matter the job, there has to be a will to do them. 2) Nope, probably not 3) What's not that hard? Raising a child?? Jesus Christ, are you serious? Can raising a child in a household of two (or even one) able bodied parent that chooses not to work because they don't have to in order to survive be considered child abuse? Legally? Probably not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 I'd rather hand out welfare checks than have the state confiscating children. And there are not enough people willing to take children. It is a hassle and all the raise someone's kid ya know Handing out checks with no strings attached enables irresponsible behavior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 I'd rather hand out welfare checks than have the state confiscating children. Of course you would, because handing out other people's money is always the simple-minded SoProg answer when you're not smart enough to think that other options exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Legally? Probably not So by using regressive logic, if a prebt willfully chooses to not provide for their children, that is not neglect or abuse, causing harm and suffering? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 I'd rather hand out welfare checks than have the state confiscating children. And there are not enough people willing to take children. It is a hassle and all the raise someone's kid ya know 1) They can't be good administrators or something. No matter the job, there has to be a will to do them. 2) Nope, probably not 3) What's not that hard? Raising a child?? Jesus Christ, are you serious? Legally? Probably not Who's raising someone else's child? Adoptees look at that child as theirs you dolt. No enough people willing to adopt? And you based this on what exactly? 1. BINGO!! Why should I support someone with no will. Cut the gravy train and see how quickly they find the will. 2. Well their should be. 3. Try to follow along will you. Damn you're !@#$ing dense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Of course you would, because handing out other people's money is always the simple-minded SoProg answer when you're not smart enough to think that other options exist. Handing out other people's money is simple as you pointed out and earns the votes to keep a bunch of substandard lawyers turned politician in their cushy lifestyle and it's all sold under the guise of "fairnessl". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 What, like child abuse or does she want the courts to decide if the kid gets a new xbox for Christmas or not? More the latter. Not quite that trivial...but things like granting children the right to sue for redress when they're grounded. Still pretty !@#$ed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Of course it is! As much as I can rip on progressive liberalism... It's why I align myself with it... Who doesn't want to go to the Big Rock Candy Mts.! Hens lay soft boiled eggs and there are cig trees! Quite a place... GO LEFT young man! "I don't wanna change my socks!" ~#GratitudeJournalEntry_02272016 "One evening as the sun went down and the jungle fire was burningDown the track came a hobo hiking and he said boys I'm not turningI'm headin' for a land that's far away beside the crystal fountainsSo come with me we'll go and see the Big Rock Candy Mountains In the Big Rock Candy Mountains there's a land that's fair and brightWhere the handouts grow on bushes and you sleep out every nightWhere the boxcars are all empty and the sun shines every dayOn the birds and the bees and the cigarette treesWhere the lemonade springs where the bluebird singsIn the Big Rock Candy Mountains In the Big Rock Candy Mountains all the cops have wooden legsAnd the bulldogs all have rubber teeth and the hens lay soft boiled eggsThe farmer's trees are full of fruit and the barns are full of hayOh, I'm bound to go where there ain't no snowWhere the rain don't fall and the wind don't blowIn the Big Rock Candy Mountains In the Big Rock Candy Mountains you never change your socksAnd the little streams of alcohol come a-trickling down the rocksThe brakemen have to tip their hats and the railroad bulls are blindThere's a lake of stew and of whiskey tooYou can paddle all around 'em in a big canoeIn the Big Rock Candy Mountains In the Big Rock Candy Mountains the jails are made of tinAnd you can walk right out again as soon as you are inThere ain't no short handled shovels, no axes saws or picksI'm a goin to stay where you sleep all dayWhere they hung the jerk that invented workIn the Big Rock Candy Mountains I'll see you all this coming fall in the Big Rock Candy Mountains" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Welcome back EII. Not really ya dodo bird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Welcome back EII. Not really ya dodo bird. I have always been here... It is usually those first few "icebreaker" posts that get me rolling! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I have always been here... It is usually those first few "icebreaker" posts that get me rolling! I thought that maybe you felt that gatorette and lyrbob weren't posting enough and you needed to fill in the gap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I thought that maybe you felt that gatorette and lyrbob weren't posting enough and you needed to fill in the gap. Yeah... You are right, your circle jerk was posting too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Yeah... You are right, your circle jerk was posting too much. Did you get gatorette's permission to use that term? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Did you get gatorette's permission to use that term? Don't need to, been using it the last 14 years here. Fair use policy since the 2003 Iraq ramp up to war. 2003 was a banner year for the main PPP conservative CircleJerk, 2016 is shaping up well too. #3rdnlngPPPCircleJerkingSince2008&PresumablyBefore #What'sInYourWallet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Don't need to, been using it the last 14 years here. Fair use policy since the 2003 Iraq ramp up to war. 2003 was a banner year for the main PPP conservative CircleJerk, 2016 is shaping up well too. #3rdnlngPPPCircleJerkingSince2008&PresumablyBefore #What'sInYourWallet? Nice math. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 (edited) Nice math. I round my math up... You go down. I have been a member since 2002. Edited February 27, 2016 by ExiledInIllinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 27, 2016 Author Share Posted February 27, 2016 I round my math up... You go down. I have been a member since 2002. But, to be fair, I bet 3rd was a doofus before 2002. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 (edited) But, to be fair, I bet 3rd was a doofus before 2002. Yeah, no doubt... On the board in those days we had Rich in Ohio (RiO)... Same kinda doofus as 3rd. Edited February 27, 2016 by ExiledInIllinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts