Jump to content

Oh Canada


Dante

Recommended Posts

Cha ching. Spare no expense. I'm surprised it's as little as 6000 of them. Really weird that they will actually build mosques for them but I bet if you tried to plant a statue of Jesus in public somewhere it would be gone asap.

 

http://www.therebel.media/breaking_liberals_to_build_refugee_camps_on_canadian_military_bases_taxpayers_will_fund_mosques_korans?utm_campaign=refugeesonbase&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making up for past mistakes?

 

They needed Canada’s help and Canada said no.

It was 1939 and 907 Jewish refugees aboard the German transatlantic liner St. Louis were seeking sanctuary from Nazi Germany. Canada refused to take them in and the ship sailed back to Europe, where 254 would later die in concentration camps.

A display now on at the Museum of Industry in Stellarton tells the sad tale of the St. Louis and its ill-fated passengers.

http://thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/1174272-canada-turned-away-jewish-refugees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making up for past mistakes?

 

They needed Canada’s help and Canada said no.

It was 1939 and 907 Jewish refugees aboard the German transatlantic liner St. Louis were seeking sanctuary from Nazi Germany. Canada refused to take them in and the ship sailed back to Europe, where 254 would later die in concentration camps.

A display now on at the Museum of Industry in Stellarton tells the sad tale of the St. Louis and its ill-fated passengers.

http://thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/1174272-canada-turned-away-jewish-refugees

Different situation now. Didn't have to worry about the jews raping women, buggering kids and shooting up malls. They were true refugees not an invasion force.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making up for past mistakes?

 

They needed Canada’s help and Canada said no.

It was 1939 and 907 Jewish refugees aboard the German transatlantic liner St. Louis were seeking sanctuary from Nazi Germany. Canada refused to take them in and the ship sailed back to Europe, where 254 would later die in concentration camps.

A display now on at the Museum of Industry in Stellarton tells the sad tale of the St. Louis and its ill-fated passengers.

http://thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/1174272-canada-turned-away-jewish-refugees

 

Yes.....that's exactly what they're doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making up for past mistakes?

 

They needed Canada’s help and Canada said no.

It was 1939 and 907 Jewish refugees aboard the German transatlantic liner St. Louis were seeking sanctuary from Nazi Germany. Canada refused to take them in and the ship sailed back to Europe, where 254 would later die in concentration camps.

A display now on at the Museum of Industry in Stellarton tells the sad tale of the St. Louis and its ill-fated passengers.

http://thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/1174272-canada-turned-away-jewish-refugees

FDR kept them out of the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong, Breckenridge Long

 

Congress lowered the immigration quota legislatively to a floor of about 150k (for all nationalities, combined) by the time of the Great Depression, before FDR was elected, with the Immigration Act of 1924. Further restrictions (literacy and economic requirements) were put in place by Hoover. The end result of that is that, of the 20,000 Germans allowed visas under quota every year, only the richest Jewish-German emigrants weren't restricted (since the Nazi Reich Flight Tax disproportionately targeted Jews and impoverished those wishing to emigrate, thus making them ineligible for US visas). Long was an !@#$. But he was an !@#$ ten years after that combination of quota system and Reichsfluctsteuer effectively blocked Jewish emigration from Central Europe.

 

I know you're going to call that "obfuscation," because you can't be bothered with details, and because you're a complete !@#$head who subscribes to the "Great Man" theory of history, so believes anything that doesn't trace back to a single person is just incorrect, and think that somebody somewhere must be responsible. Now go show us another example of the First Gatorman Fallacy, with a link to something you didn't read and don't understand that ultimately proves you're wrong anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...