truth on hold Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) No matter what happened in LA, that he's currently serving a 33 year sentence for attempting to recover his own stolen property is a complete travesty of justice, not to mention an enormous waste of tax payer money Edited February 6, 2016 by truth on hold
bbb Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 It was a makeup call. I like how he was charged with kidnapping somebody who never left their own hotel room.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 OJ sure lol I honestly believe his son did it or at the very least was involved. I think OJ covered for him knowing he'd have a much better chance getting acquitted. http://www.businessinsider.com/oj-simpson-murders-and-jason-simpson-2014-6?op=1 so he's going to kill his mother
truth on hold Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) I honestly believe his son did it or at the very least was involved. I think OJ covered for him knowing he'd have a much better chance getting acquitted. http://www.businessinsider.com/oj-simpson-murders-and-jason-simpson-2014-6?op=1 Wonder too if he was concerned multiple murders would draw capital punishment, and didn't want the burden of providing the testimony that sent his son to the chair (actually lethal injection in Cali) Edited February 6, 2016 by truth on hold
Chef Jim Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 Wonder too if he was concerned multiple murders would draw capital punishment, and didn't want the burden of providing the testimony that sent his son to the chair (actually lethal injection in Cali) Someone being put to death in California?
truth on hold Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) Someone being put to death in California? It was happening in the 90's. And anyway it's not like OJ was an expert on the California sentencing prospects for double murderers in the immediate aftermath of Ron and Nicole's death, but probably knew capital punishment was a possibility. Would you want the burden of providing the key testimony that could potentially get your kid executed? Edited February 6, 2016 by truth on hold
YoloinOhio Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 I just watched it. The casting was good, but so far it's a little underwhelming. I hope it gets better. It has potential.
truth on hold Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Martin Sheen Making ID Docuseries About OJ Simpson's Innocence in Nicole Brown Murder http://mstarsnews.musictimes.com/articles/110463/20160331/martin-sheen-docuseries-o-j-simpsons-innocent-nicole-brown-murder.htm
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 Martin Sheen Making ID Docuseries About OJ Simpson's Innocence in Nicole Brown Murder http://mstarsnews.musictimes.com/articles/110463/20160331/martin-sheen-docuseries-o-j-simpsons-innocent-nicole-brown-murder.htm I am an OJ trial junkie, and this looks great.
bbb Posted April 1, 2016 Posted April 1, 2016 I think this series has been awesome. It's the way I remember everything...........Last night, I was thinking Whoa, I don't remember this whole crazy Fuhrman racist craziness on tape. How could I be so blind to think it was only that he had once been caught on tape saying the n word............Then, it turned out that's all that was heard in court - the perjury part - due to Ito's decision.
YoloinOhio Posted April 2, 2016 Posted April 2, 2016 I am up to date on the episodes now and it definitely got a LOT better IMO around episode 4 or so. Once they stopped playing up the Kardashians, etc and hit into the actual trial it's been great. Hate to see it end but the 30 for 30 will be on soon to fill the OJ void.
bbb Posted April 2, 2016 Posted April 2, 2016 I am up to date on the episodes now and it definitely got a LOT better IMO around episode 4 or so. Once they stopped playing up the Kardashians, etc and hit into the actual trial it's been great. Hate to see it end but the 30 for 30 will be on soon to fill the OJ void. Yeah, that Kardashian thing at the beginning was very annoying. I'm glad that stopped, too.............I normally hate Schwimmer, but after an episode or two of looking at him as Ross, I think he's done a real good job here.
CountryCletus Posted April 3, 2016 Author Posted April 3, 2016 So, does anyone think he really didn't do it?
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 Yeah, that Kardashian thing at the beginning was very annoying. I'm glad that stopped, too.............I normally hate Schwimmer, but after an episode or two of looking at him as Ross, I think he's done a real good job here. Schwimmer has been great. But I think the actors who have played Darden and Clark have stolen the show. Phenomenal job by them.
CountryCletus Posted April 3, 2016 Author Posted April 3, 2016 Schwimmer has been great. But I think the actors who have played Darden and Clark have stolen the show. Phenomenal job by them. Except they didn't show her nude photos..... What a scam!!! And everytime that dude playing Darden in on I keep thinking I'm watching an episode of Army Wives...
/dev/null Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 Esquire Network is going to start re-running the OJ trial. I don't see the appeal, but hey sounds like some of you might
bbb Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 Esquire Network is going to start re-running the OJ trial. I don't see the appeal, but hey sounds like some of you might There's an Esquire Network!?!
YoloinOhio Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 Schwimmer has been great. But I think the actors who have played Darden and Clark have stolen the show. Phenomenal job by them. agree. And the actor playing Johnnie Cochran too. Great casting.
bbb Posted April 3, 2016 Posted April 3, 2016 The casting is great except for Gooding as OJ. I have to keep saying - Oh, yeah - that's supposed to be OJ. Everybody else IS their character. Especially Darden!
Recommended Posts