Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

And a coup against the heirs of the throne by a woman who's not nearly as competent as she thinks she is.

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Secretary Hiliary Rodham of House Clinton.  First of her name.  First Lady of Arknsas and the United States.  Senator from New York.  Secretary of State.  Systems Administrator of Insecure Bathroom Servers, Writer of Books. Rigger of Primaries.  Loser of Elections

  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

Secretary Hiliary Rodham of House Clinton.  First of her name.  First Lady of Arknsas and the United States.  Senator from New York.  Secretary of State.  Systems Administrator of Insecure Bathroom Servers, Writer of Books. Rigger of Primaries.  Loser of Elections

when does the final act appear on stage?

Beavis-and-Butt-Head-Eating-Popcorn-Watc

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

By the way...for those who foegot, the Rwandan genocide was in full swing 25 years ago this month.

 

Which is one of the top reasons I truly hate this "female dog in heat."

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Was Bill the only President to have two carpetbagging failures in the wake of his reputation?

 

Algore should have been an easy coattails win as Papa Bush was after Reagan

 

and that awful woman who failed to cash in as well

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, row_33 said:

Was Bill the only President to have two carpetbagging failures in the wake of his reputation?

 

Algore should have been an easy coattails win as Papa Bush was after Reagan

 

and that awful woman who failed to cash in as well

 

 

 


Don't blame Bill for either one of those losses; neither one would listen to him. Gore distanced himself from Bill instead of having him campaign with him. Word was out during her campaign that Hillary would not listen to Bill, and she lost (in part) due to that. People can (and do) say whatever they like about Bill Clinton, but even his "enemies" have correctly called him politically savvy. Those two were stupid (my guess is that in Hillary's case is she wanted to do it "alone" (ie, by herself, with no help from her "husband"), and in Gore's case he listened to bad advice from his campaign manager and a few others), and they lost (in part) because they were dumb.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Don't blame Bill for either one of those losses; neither one would listen to him. Gore distanced himself from Bill instead of having him campaign with him. Word was out during her campaign that Hillary would not listen to Bill, and she lost (in part) due to that. People can (and do) say whatever they like about Bill Clinton, but even his "enemies" have correctly called him politically savvy. Those two were stupid (my guess is that in Hillary's case is she wanted to do it "alone" (ie, by herself, with no help from her "husband"), and in Gore's case he listened to bad advice from his campaign manager and a few others), and they lost (in part) because they were dumb.  

 

Not Bill's fault, but did any other two-term non-disgrace have two plum picked sugarbabies biff as bad as these two did in his wake?

 

 

Posted
16 hours ago, DC Tom said:

By the way...for those who foegot, the Rwandan genocide was in full swing 25 years ago this month.

 

Which is one of the top reasons I truly hate this "female dog in heat."

 

 

 

She is only upset that they did not donate enough money to the Clinton money laundering Foundation to have her look the other way. You know, like the other countries with human rights abuses against women from which she gladly accepts donations in exchange for looking the other way.

Posted
11 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

She is only upset that they did not donate enough money to the Clinton money laundering Foundation to have her look the other way. You know, like the other countries with human rights abuses against women from which she gladly accepts donations in exchange for looking the other way.

 

if she collected all this money and has fulfilled none of the serious promises, wouldn't there be repercussions?

 

you know like when you take on consignment a few kilos from serious people and then rip them off

Posted
1 minute ago, row_33 said:

 

if she collected all this money and has fulfilled none of the serious promises, wouldn't there be repercussions?

 

you know like when you take on consignment a few kilos from serious people and then rip them off

 

Well, the donations did dry up when she lost to a Cheeto. Does that count?

Posted
11 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

Well, the donations did dry up when she lost to a Cheeto. Does that count?

 

i believe her donations were hinging on some pretty serious promises for when she won

 

i don't believe Trump has fulfilled any that he didn't already agree upon

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

You'd think the last thing Hillary would ever do in her lifetime is wear a blue dress.

 

yeah baby!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

wish some media scrum had a brain or some balls to ask about it.

 

Posted
13 hours ago, B-Man said:

Interesting, only Americans should decide US elections?  So, you were all aboard with bringing the hammer down on your hubby when Gore happened to walk away with oodles of Tibetan Buddhist monks cash, right?  Too bad there was "no controlling legal authority" actually able to enforce that one, right?  (Funny how laws designed to keep politicians honest always seem to have such loopholes baked in.)

 

And, you've never comingled Clinton Foundation money with your own nor has that organization ever accepted foreign donations, right?  Oh, how silly, that money wasn't for electioneering, that was for policy setting; totally different realm.

 

Yup, she's definitely legit in her criticizing on this. <_<

  • Like (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...