Deranged Rhino Posted October 28, 2018 Posted October 28, 2018 Newly released. Name redacted. judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JW-v.-DOJ-Comey-Clinton-Announcement-docs-01448.pdf 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 28, 2018 Posted October 28, 2018 10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Newly released. Name redacted. judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JW-v.-DOJ-Comey-Clinton-Announcement-docs-01448.pdf 424 pages!? Well, I gotta say, JW does yeomen's work. Gonna take a while to read through this. There are so many redacted names, it is like throwing darts to figure out who is who. Goodlatte wanted her charged? And then all the pages discussing how this was playing the press!?
Foxx Posted October 28, 2018 Posted October 28, 2018 28 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Newly released. Name redacted. judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JW-v.-DOJ-Comey-Clinton-Announcement-docs-01448.pdf link doesn't work for me.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 28, 2018 Posted October 28, 2018 6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: 424 pages!? Well, I gotta say, JW does yeomen's work. Gonna take a while to read through this. There are so many redacted names, it is like throwing darts to figure out who is who. Goodlatte wanted her charged? And then all the pages discussing how this was playing the press!? Yup. It's all on display for people to read and see for themselves. It's worse than a two tier justice system, it's evidence of a systemic breach of national security from which high officials were profiting. Working on trying to get a better handle on some of the redactions... will report back if I have any success. Just now, Foxx said: link doesn't work for me. Try this: https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JW-v.-DOJ-Comey-Clinton-Announcement-docs-01448.pdf 2
KevinRome Posted October 28, 2018 Posted October 28, 2018 One thing to note with any of the FOIA releases is the reasons for withholding release, which translate to releasable with redactions: https://www.foia.gov/faq.html I doubt many of the redactions fit national security exemptions or anything else. 2
/dev/null Posted October 29, 2018 Posted October 29, 2018 Strike up the Lesley Gore background music: It's her party and she'll run if she wants to...
Nanker Posted October 29, 2018 Posted October 29, 2018 Doesn't want "to run" for President, but would "like to be President." JUST APPOINT/ANOINT ME SUPREME LEADER When the Dems get back in the Oval Office, "there's going to be so much work that's got to be done." LIKE RE-ESTABLISHING THE CLINTON FOUNDATION "I mean we have confused everybody in the world, including ourselves." THEY'VE STOPPED GIVING ME AND BILL MONEY "We have confused our friends and our enemies." THE CURRENT POTUS WON'T TAKE THEIR MONEY - WHAT THE ***** "They have no idea what the United States stands for, what we are likely to do, what we think is important." THE OLD WAY OF DOING BUSINESS WITH THEM DOESN'T WORK NOW "So the work is work I feel very prepared for." HAVING SIPHONED HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS FROM THEM BEFORE, I STAND AT THE READY TO RE-ESTABLISH THOSE OLD TIES "There's going to be a lot of heavy lifting." I'M GONNA NEED SOME EMPTY PALLETS TO PUT THE CASH ON Yes, Hill. Life is different now that you're an insignificant pimple on the ass of a gnat. We know exactly what you meant by what you said. You're a power-hungry money grabbing grifter.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 To be fair, I don't think she was saying that - but I do think she was taking a shot at the moderator because she's snippy like like that in a hostile way. 1
Golden Goat Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: To be fair, I don't think she was saying that - but I do think she was taking a shot at the moderator because she's snippy like like that in a hostile way. Imagine if Nikki Haley said it, regardless of context? 2
Prickly Pete Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 (edited) Shooting at her friend. I wish this interviewer would have busted Hillary's balls a little after that...deep down she must have wanted to. Hillary acts so butch around lesbians. Edited October 30, 2018 by OJ Tom
GG Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Metaphors and hyperbole, duh! 1
IDBillzFan Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 (edited) 20 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: To be fair, I don't think she was saying that - but I do think she was taking a shot at the moderator because she's snippy like like that in a hostile way. Agreed. The problem isn't what she said. Grown adults understand the context of what she said. The problem is that If that were a conservative, only conservatives would be the grown adults and the peace,tibs,baskin,coachtuesdays of the world would be crapping purple Twinkies and demanding every conservative in the country denounce those words, etc. It's unfortunate, but I'd rather take the high road than find myself trying to agree with leftist nutbags about whatever has their panties wedged today. Edited October 30, 2018 by LABillzFan 2
B-Man Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 Hillary Says She Won’t Run Again, Which Means She’ll Probably Run Again.
Deranged Rhino Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 This (creepy) picture is making the rounds today. Lots of people claiming it's new, it's not. It's from 2016:
3rdnlng Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This (creepy) picture is making the rounds today. Lots of people claiming it's new, it's not. It's from 2016: No seatbelts being worn by anyone visible. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: No seatbelts being worn by anyone visible. Well, she has that gentleman's arms around her as she sits on his lap... maybe she thinks that counts as a seat belt? (also, most protection agents don't wear belts when they drive. slows down their ability to get out of the car fast)
boyst Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This (creepy) picture is making the rounds today. Lots of people claiming it's new, it's not. It's from 2016: And with my tinfoil hat on... I ask... Why?
Recommended Posts