Jump to content

Clinton Political Dynasty


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

https://www.redstate.com/slee/2018/08/28/hillary-clintons-campaign-implicated-84-million-campaign-finance-scandal/

 

Anyone surprised ?

 

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Implicated In $84 Million Campaign Finance Scandal

The attempt to turn the Stormy Daniels unpleasantness into a campaign finance violation — a weak attempt as it tuns out — is starting to come into focus as a new Federal Elections Commission (FEC) complaint filed by The Committee to Defend the President alleges the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) was “us[ing] state chapters as straw men to circumvent campaign donation limits and launder(ing) the money back to her campaign.”

 

Dan Backer, the campaign finance attorney who filed the complaint, writes in Investors Business Daily that the scheme puts the conviction of filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza, who was prosecuted “for giving a handful of associates money they then contributed to a candidate of his preference” to shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2018 at 2:30 PM, Tiberius said:

Obsessing on Hillary still 

 

Tell Hillary and Obama to get over the election and move on and stop obsessing about Trump.

 

It works both ways, but hey it's typical of you to say it's ok for one side and not the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DOG BITES MAN: Ken Starr Makes Makes Explosive Revelation About Hillary Clinton In New Memoir.

In Starr’s memoir, which was obtained in advance by Fox News, Starr recounts his investigation into the death of White House adviser Vince Foster and other matters related to the Whitewater investigation.

 

“I was upset over Mrs. Clinton’s performance, and was even considering bringing the matter before the Washington grand jury for possible indictment on perjury,” Starr wrote, according to an excerpt of “Contempt: A Memoir of the Clinton Investigation” reviewed by Fox News.

 

“In the space of three hours, she claimed, by our count, over a hundred times that she ‘did not recall’ or ‘did not remember,'” Starr continued. “This suggested outright mendacity. To be sure, human memory is notoriously fallible, but her strained performance struck us as preposterous.”

 

Starr said that he ultimately decided not to bring charges against the then-first lady because it would be difficult to prove that she lied when she said “I don’t recall” and “I don’t remember.”

 

“What was clear was that Mrs. Clinton couldn’t be bothered to make it appear as if she were telling the truth,” Starr concluded.

 

 

 

She still can’t.

 

.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...