row_33 Posted May 10, 2018 Posted May 10, 2018 48 minutes ago, joesixpack said: That would be a disaster for the republic. Anything that wasn’t completely rigged for Hillary was an evil action anything rigged for her was righteous
4merper4mer Posted May 10, 2018 Posted May 10, 2018 1 hour ago, joesixpack said: That would be a disaster for the republic. Correct
row_33 Posted May 11, 2018 Posted May 11, 2018 Change the way the votes are counted and you change how a campaign is run We have a Provincial election in a month, with the ruling Liberals expected to be kicked out hard by the Consercatives. my riding for 20 years has never given more than 3 percent to Conservatives so I’m voting for the Liberal candidate to hopefully keep out the Socialist-Crypto Communist candidate
KD in CA Posted May 11, 2018 Posted May 11, 2018 6 hours ago, row_33 said: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/05/07/609060190/connecticut-oks-bill-pledging-electoral-votes-to-national-popular-vote-winner You denounce the Electoral College, but see success as trying to grab 270 of the EC votes? Liberal logic right there.... " As NPR noted in 2016, it's mathematically possible for a candidate to win the U.S. presidency with less than 25 percent of the national popular vote. " yet they looked over it all 10,000 times and could not once find a roadmap for Trump to get 270... Will be hilarious to watch the backtrack from all these uber-liberal idiots next time a Republican candidate wins the popular vote.
row_33 Posted May 11, 2018 Posted May 11, 2018 8 hours ago, KD in CA said: Will be hilarious to watch the backtrack from all these uber-liberal idiots next time a Republican candidate wins the popular vote. Its sad watching them talk about how many goalposts they hit losing 2-1 in the game
DC Tom Posted May 11, 2018 Posted May 11, 2018 9 hours ago, KD in CA said: Will be hilarious to watch the backtrack from all these uber-liberal idiots next time a Republican candidate wins the popular vote. CA alone contains more people than 25 least populous states combined. Between them and NY, a Republican's not winning the popular vote again in our lifetime. 15 hours ago, row_33 said: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/05/07/609060190/connecticut-oks-bill-pledging-electoral-votes-to-national-popular-vote-winner You denounce the Electoral College, but see success as trying to grab 270 of the EC votes? Liberal logic right there.... " As NPR noted in 2016, it's mathematically possible for a candidate to win the U.S. presidency with less than 25 percent of the national popular vote. " yet they looked over it all 10,000 times and could not once find a roadmap for Trump to get 270... This is voter suppression. Nothing less. 1
row_33 Posted May 11, 2018 Posted May 11, 2018 they are fully within right to seek to amend the Constitution all this fuss over Hillary? and they say she was a horrible candidate?
B-Man Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 (edited) "Scarf Woman" speaks again......................... ..............(We Keep letting her down) Quote MediaiteVerified account @Mediaite FollowFollow @Mediaite Hillary Clinton: A 'Very Large Portion' of the US Population Feels 'Uneasy' About Women Seeking Power http://mediaite.com/a/oantw Hillary is of course referencing sexist Obama voters from 2008....... Edited May 12, 2018 by B-Man
/dev/null Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: "Scarf Woman" speaks again......................... . Her scarf gives +10 to endurance, +5 to stamina, and -100 to charisma 6
outsidethebox Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 Too bad she doesn't wrap it around her ugly mug! Nasty old B word!
B-Man Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 Why do you right wing nuts keep bringing up the Clintons ? Because they are STILL here. Reminder:A New Clinton Wave Is Coming This Spring. Clinton Foundation to host glittering New York gala - featuring Shaggy and Sting - with VIP tables costing $100,000by Iain Burns Original Article
IDBillzFan Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 1 hour ago, row_33 said: She is going to be the Dem candidate in 2020 1
row_33 Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 Who else can stand up to her? if she wants it she will be handed the nomination
Keukasmallies Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 35 minutes ago, row_33 said: Who else can stand up to her? if she wants it she will be handed the nomination again. Fixed
row_33 Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 8 minutes ago, Keukasmallies said: Fixed Are the Dems, at the core of the brain trust, convinced they can win in 2020? Who would they put up as a solid contender if they think they can win?
Koko78 Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 28 minutes ago, row_33 said: Are the Dems, at the core of the brain trust, convinced they can win in 2020? Who would they put up as a solid contender if they think they can win? Either Hillary, Warren, or Bernie. The cupboard is pretty bare. Kamala Harris is smart enough to wait until 2024. Cory Booker is functionally retarded.
row_33 Posted May 12, 2018 Posted May 12, 2018 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Either Hillary, Warren, or Bernie. The cupboard is pretty bare. Kamala Harris is smart enough to wait until 2024. Cory Booker is functionally retarded. A leaked memo from the DNC saying Trump cannot be beaten would be nice
Recommended Posts