Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
48 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

That would be a disaster for the republic. 

 

Anything that wasn’t completely rigged for Hillary was an evil action 

 

anything rigged for her was righteous

 

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Change the way the votes are counted and you change how a campaign is run

 

We have a Provincial election in a month, with the ruling Liberals expected to be kicked out hard by the Consercatives.

 

my riding for 20 years has never given more than 3 percent to Conservatives so I’m voting for the Liberal candidate to hopefully keep out the Socialist-Crypto Communist candidate 

Posted
6 hours ago, row_33 said:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/05/07/609060190/connecticut-oks-bill-pledging-electoral-votes-to-national-popular-vote-winner

 

You denounce the Electoral College, but see success as trying to grab 270 of the EC votes?   Liberal logic right there....  :ph34r:

" As NPR noted in 2016, it's mathematically possible for a candidate to win the U.S. presidency with less than 25 percent of the national popular vote. "

 

yet they looked over it all 10,000 times and could not once find a roadmap for Trump to get 270...  ;)

 

Will be hilarious to watch the backtrack from all these uber-liberal idiots next time a Republican candidate wins the popular vote.

Posted
8 hours ago, KD in CA said:

 

Will be hilarious to watch the backtrack from all these uber-liberal idiots next time a Republican candidate wins the popular vote.

 

Its sad watching them talk about how many goalposts they hit losing 2-1 in the game

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, KD in CA said:

 

Will be hilarious to watch the backtrack from all these uber-liberal idiots next time a Republican candidate wins the popular vote.

 

CA alone contains more people than 25 least populous states combined.  Between them and NY, a Republican's not winning the popular vote again in our lifetime.

 

15 hours ago, row_33 said:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/05/07/609060190/connecticut-oks-bill-pledging-electoral-votes-to-national-popular-vote-winner

 

You denounce the Electoral College, but see success as trying to grab 270 of the EC votes?   Liberal logic right there....  :ph34r:

" As NPR noted in 2016, it's mathematically possible for a candidate to win the U.S. presidency with less than 25 percent of the national popular vote. "

 

yet they looked over it all 10,000 times and could not once find a roadmap for Trump to get 270...  ;)

 

This is voter suppression.  Nothing less.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

they are fully within right to seek to amend the Constitution

 

all this fuss over Hillary?  and they say she was a horrible candidate?

 

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

 

 

 

Posted (edited)

 

"Scarf Woman" speaks again.........................

 

Dc9gcafXUAAixMy.jpg..............(We Keep letting her down)

 

 
Quote

 

BtpGLHdx_bigger.jpgMediaiteVerified account @Mediaite
FollowFollow @Mediaite
 
Hillary Clinton: A 'Very Large Portion' of the US Population Feels 'Uneasy' About Women Seeking Power http://mediaite.com/a/oantw 
 

 

 

Hillary is of course referencing sexist Obama voters from 2008.......:lol:

 

Edited by B-Man
Posted
11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

"Scarf Woman" speaks again.........................

 

Dc9gcafXUAAixMy.jpg.

 

 

Her scarf gives +10 to endurance, +5 to stamina, and -100 to charisma

  • Haha (+1) 6
Posted
35 minutes ago, row_33 said:

Who else can stand up to her?

 

if she wants it she will be handed the nomination again.

 

 

Fixed

Posted
8 minutes ago, Keukasmallies said:

 

Fixed

 

Are the Dems, at the core of the brain trust, convinced they can win in 2020?

 

Who would they put up as a solid contender if they think they can win?

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

Are the Dems, at the core of the brain trust, convinced they can win in 2020?

 

Who would they put up as a solid contender if they think they can win?

 

 

Either Hillary, Warren, or Bernie. The cupboard is pretty bare.

 

Kamala Harris is smart enough to wait until 2024. Cory Booker is functionally retarded.

Posted
1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

Either Hillary, Warren, or Bernie. The cupboard is pretty bare.

 

Kamala Harris is smart enough to wait until 2024. Cory Booker is functionally retarded.

 

A leaked memo from the DNC saying Trump cannot be beaten would be nice 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...