row_33 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 Just "move on" already while I post worship of Hillary posts on here 1,200 times a week....
3rdnlng Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: You also have faith she is a mass murderer. And that all Dems are mass murderer, especially if they are front runners for the nomination. Do you know why I don't believe she is a mass murderer? Because you haven't laughed yourself to death over it.
row_33 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 The mass murderers loved by libs don't include Hillary, but I could name a bunch easily.
reddogblitz Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: Jesus Christ, she lost! You people need to move on! I will if she will. 1
row_33 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 a liberal like Tiberius blasphemes and then runs from reality all in one sentence.
Tiberius Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 1 hour ago, reddogblitz said: I will if she will. What office does she hold? So stupid to go on beating a dead horse. Shows nothing but ignorance
3rdnlng Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 Even Bill is a little sick of her: Bill and Hillary are at a Yankees home game, sitting in the first row, with the Secret Service people directly behind them. One of the Secret Service guys leans forward and whispers something to Bill. At first, Clinton stares at the guy, looks at Hillary, looks back at the agent, and shakes his head "no". The agent then says, "Mr. President, it was a unanimous request of the entire team, from the owner of the team to the bat boy." Bill hesitates, but begins to change his mind when the agent tells him the fans would love it. Bill shrugs his shoulders and says, "Ho-Kay! If that is what the people want. C'mere Hilly baby. "With that, Bill gets up, grabs Hillary by her collar and the seat of her pants, lifts her up, and tosses her right over the wall onto the field. She gets up kicking, swearing, screaming, "Bill you"!$#@&!". The crowd goes absolutely wild. Fans are jumping up and down, cheering, hooting and hollering, and high-fiving. Bill is bowing, smiling and waving to the crowd. He leans over to the agent and says, "How about that; I would have never believed how much everyone would enjoy that!" Noticing the agent has gone totally pale, he asks what is wrong. The agent replies, "Sir, I said they want you to throw out the first 'pitch'."
row_33 Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 Hillary told the world she was a lifelong Cubs fan for years until she carpetbagged and changed that to a lifelong Yankees fan.
B-Man Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 You Have to Hand It to Hillary – the Girl Can Smear American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman Original Article With the help of the DNC (broke, but forking over millions to this end), Hillary pulled off what Kimberly Strassel rightly calls “one of the dirtiest tricks in U.S. political history." She hired a smear outfit (Fusion, headed by Glenn Simpson) which put together ludicrous claims, leaked them to willing press cohorts, including David Corn at Mother Jones, hired Christopher Steele (GPS) to concoct a fairytale about Donald J Trump and had Steele give the Dossier to the FBI in July 2016. Then press megaphone Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News -- obviously tipped off by Steele -- reported, “U.S. intel officials probe ties between Trump advisor and Kremlin.” Having generated this nonsense, handed it off to the FBI, and shared the news of that handoff to Isikoff, Hillary “jumped all over it, spinning its own oppo research as a government investigation into Mr. Trump.” She and her surrogates hit the airwaves with it:
B-Man Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 Democrats ?...............................follow the law ?.......................Hahahahaha. CLETA MITCHELL AND HANS VAN SPAKOVSKY: Hillary Clinton, the DNC and the Law: Did their arrangement violate legal limits on coordination between a candidate and a party? The purpose of joint fundraising committees is to allow more than one entity to collaborate in raising money and share in the costs. Each participant is subject to federal contribution limits. When the party itself is a participant, its committee (in this case the DNC) normally handles accounting and financial controls. Not here. The Hillary Victory Fund was controlled by the Clinton campaign, with a campaign employee as treasurer and the fund’s bank account established at the Clinton campaign’s bank. According to Federal Election Commission reports, the Hillary Victory Fund has raised more than $526 million. The DNC asserted its “neutrality” by also entering into a joint fundraising committee with the Sanders campaign. It raised a total of $1,000. And the Bernie Victory Committee treasurer was the DNC’s designee. . . . Contributions to the DNC, even though made through the Hillary Victory Fund, were required by law to be transferred to the party and could not legally be withheld by the Clinton-designated treasurer. Nor does the law allow a single candidate to control a political party’s operations and expenditures. There are strict statutory limits on what a party committee can contribute to any candidate and what a party can spend in coordination with its candidates. We don’t like limits on the ability of parties to support their candidates. But campaign-finance zealots, egged on by media outlets (which are not subject to any limits), made certain that the McCain-Feingold law of 2002 stringently limited coordination between candidates and political parties. Although the Supreme Court struck down parts of McCain-Feingold in the 2010 Citizens United case, the coordination limits still apply. The FEC and the Justice Department should investigate the Clinton-DNC arrangement. Yes, they should.
Tiberius Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 This is another factor Dems have in their favor. Republicans are very much focused on fighting the last war, over and over again. Its a dumb strategy, but at least they can pretend the tire fire they elected president does not exist
Tiberius Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 Sessions looking to open openly political investigations against Clinton, Democrats and/or anyone else they think they can profit from. Our republic is at a low point https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-considering-second-special-counsel-to-investigate-republican-concerns-letter-shows/2017/11/13/bc92ef3c-c8d2-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_justiceletter-815pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.aae02cfd67f2
4merper4mer Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 17 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Sessions looking to open openly political investigations against Clinton, Democrats and/or anyone else they think they can profit from. Our republic is at a low point https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-considering-second-special-counsel-to-investigate-republican-concerns-letter-shows/2017/11/13/bc92ef3c-c8d2-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_justiceletter-815pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.aae02cfd67f2 Leave Hillary alone to be our billionaire moral compass.
/dev/null Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 23 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Sessions looking to open openly political investigations against Clinton, Democrats and/or anyone else they think they can profit from. Our republic is at a low point https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-considering-second-special-counsel-to-investigate-republican-concerns-letter-shows/2017/11/13/bc92ef3c-c8d2-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_justiceletter-815pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.aae02cfd67f2 6 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Leave Hillary alone to be our billionaire moral compass. 1
row_33 Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 (edited) One anecdote I read from somewhere recently.... a Dem pollster asked his reliable weather-vane voting citizen in Arkansas of 40 years about the local mood in 2016. The voter said that anyone with personal conservative leanings in 2016 is voting GOP because they are saying that they'll have to hand their guns in when forced to attend gay weddings. The pollster stated that Bill would hear this and strategize immediately how to tap into this thinking and maybe flip 1/3 of them back to vote Dem through emotion or logic or decency, maybe even visit a few locals himself to do this. Hill would sneer and say "deplorables" and do nothing about it. Edited November 14, 2017 by row_33
Tiberius Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 I guess there are enough people out there who believe Hillary was a Russian stooge and Trump is the one being framed. All the evidence that matters is what Trump says and that is where all truth, evidence and actions should flow from, the will of the leader
row_33 Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 48 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I guess there are enough people out there who believe Hillary was a Russian stooge and Trump is the one being framed. All the evidence that matters is what Trump says and that is where all truth, evidence and actions should flow from, the will of the leader you are the only person saying Hillary was a Russian stooge I think she was utterly clueless about anything at all, unable to walk up stairs or breathe for 5 minutes without a coughing spasm of alarm.
Tiberius Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 7 minutes ago, row_33 said: you are the only person saying Hillary was a Russian stooge I think she was utterly clueless about anything at all, unable to walk up stairs or breathe for 5 minutes without a coughing spasm of alarm. The Uranium nonsense.
Recommended Posts