Deranged Rhino Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 I hope we dont lose her unintended comedy routine over the next decade. - Even with the FBI in her pocket she couldnt win. I'm not predicting anything, just reporting the rumors - but from sources that are more right than they are wrong. The next few weeks are going to be a bumpy ride if this turns out to be true. Allegedly we are either going to finally get the October Surprise from JA which was promised last October - or we're going to get info about our own government being complicit in the assassination of a sitting president. If it's Assange, it'll be CF related and also be a big blow to the FBI who will suddenly have to explain not only how she's not behind bars for treason, but how they cleared her before investigating her. If it's the other, then most of the perpetrators will have already been dead (but one, who is already close to death's door).
row_33 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 they cleared her before investigating, it seemed like the usual whitewash of Dem politiclans and nothing unusual, and then WHAMMO with the accusation out of the blue a few weeks before the election.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 they cleared her before investigating, it seemed like the usual whitewash of Dem politiclans and nothing unusual, and then WHAMMO with the accusation out of the blue a few weeks before the election. From tonight: https://twitter.com/ZPGIFs/status/920107670509629441
Deranged Rhino Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 And those friendly to HRC in the media are already trying to ramp up a first strike offensive. It won't work. https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/920035855229685760
DC Tom Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 And those friendly to HRC in the media are already trying to ramp up a first strike offensive. It won't work. https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/920035855229685760 It'll work. Don't underestimate the passionate, willful ignorance of her personality cult. Or the passionate, willfully ignorant Twitterrhea of the Oompa-Loompa-in-Chief.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 It'll work. Don't underestimate the passionate, willful ignorance of her personality cult. Or the passionate, willfully ignorant Twitterrhea of the Oompa-Loompa-in-Chief. Probably true, sadly. And I am getting ahead of myself posting on the fly. These are still rumors, but the Hannity announcement and JA's twitter feed over the past 48 hours, coupled with lots of other "rumors"... there could actually be some fire behind this smoke. We'll find out over the next week.
row_33 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Perhaps she is finding that nobody cares about her views or potential power any more.
4merper4mer Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 She's going to ground. An October surprise is rumored to be coming out: the huma emails collected of wieners computer. They will allegedly paint a clear picture of pay for play and treason - if true, the FBI is toast too. https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/919671345855762432 I think he just scanned his Powerball ticket.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 First article to come out. More coming today: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration?amp It's about to get fun.
B-Man Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 First article to come out. More coming today: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration?amp It's about to get fun. More about DR's post/link LOOKING FOR A RUSSIAN BRIBERY PLOT? HERE IT IS, AND IT INVOLVES OBAMA AND CLINTON: FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow. Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews. Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show. They also obtained an eyewitness account – backed by documents – indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill. The racketeering scheme was conducted “with the consent of higher level officials” in Russia who “shared the proceeds” from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later. Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefitting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions. . . . “The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by U.S. or Russian officials. So it was basically a coverup. Plus: The investigation was ultimately supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, an Obama appointee who now serves as President Trump’s deputy attorney general, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, now the deputy FBI director under Trump, Justice Department documents show. Both men now play a key role in the current investigation into possible, but still unproven collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election. McCabe is under congressional and Justice Department inspector general investigation in connection with money his wife’s Virginia state Senate campaign accepted in 2015 from now-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe at a time when McAuliffe was reportedly under investigation by the FBI. The connections to the current Russia case are many.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Good stuff, B. From what I'm hearing, Trump has a decision to make. He can either break more of the story himself today at his presser in the next hour - or wait for Assange/Hannity/Mueller to do it (yes, Mueller) to drop the NYPD Weiner files. This is going to be very bad for not just the CF, HRC, but also the DOJ and FBI. CIA is next on the chopping block after this storm.
row_33 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 I don't perceive there is much of an appetite to pursue this matter deeply. Hollywood is going to deflate anything about Russia. And we've been bombarded by total made-up garbage about Russia for a year now, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........
GG Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 I don't perceive there is much of an appetite to pursue this matter deeply. Hollywood is going to deflate anything about Russia. And we've been bombarded by total made-up garbage about Russia for a year now, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz........... For that, you'd need a bigger fish than Weinstein. Somebody like .... Spielberg.
row_33 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 He's never been in the rumour-mill, unlike Harvey.
B-Man Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 BBC to Hillary: After Weinstein, Do You Regret Dismissing Bill’s Accusers? https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2017/10/16/ British journalist Andy Marr went there. The BBC presenter on Sunday hammered Hillary Clinton in a way that most American reporters wouldn’t dare. After asking her about the Harvey Weinstein scandal, Marr didn’t let this bit of hypocrisy go unchecked from the presidential candidate: “We recognize that this kind of behavior cannot be tolerated anywhere, whether it’s in entertainment, politics.”After Clinton suggested that women need to “stand” against abuse from men, Marr shot back: “This depends on women coming forward and having the courage to come forward. And yet in your book, the three women brought onto stage by Trump attacking your husband and you kind of dismissed them. Was that the right thing to do? No wonder she "broke her toe"
row_33 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Poor lady, she has to stop being the boy in the bubble with the media and handlers who haven't said No or stopped her from getting her way every single second of the day since the 1970s. time to disappear, you had a good public career for someone this limited, you should have no regrets unless it really gets tough the next few months...
reddogblitz Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 lousy turnout leading to the cancellation of the rest of her tour? spinal tap 2.0? Can Hillary do Stonehenge? Maybe she can do Jazz Odessy?
Deranged Rhino Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 He's never been in the rumour-mill, unlike Harvey. ... He's never been in the rumor mill for sexually harassing women, yes. But look deeper and you'll see what GG is referring to.
row_33 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 ... He's never been in the rumor mill for sexually harassing women, yes. But look deeper and you'll see what GG is referring to. i just deal with what is presented in real evidence, that is too much to have to try to deal with
GG Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 ... He's never been in the rumor mill for sexually harassing women, yes. But look deeper and you'll see what GG is referring to. There are only a handful of people who would fit the Coreys' allegations.
Recommended Posts