/dev/null Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 This is what happened: Hillary, "I don't know Vlad... 'deplorables' sounds awfully strong." Vlad, "Trust me Hill. It'll energize your base and what's more important it will demoralize Trump's" Hillary, "Vlad, are you sure I don't have to campaign in Wisconsin?" Vlad, "Trust me Hill. Obama signed a secret law that gave Wisconsin to Canada. Their votes won't count. Stick to campaigning in California." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 Trump wants to pass a health care law just because, having no clue what's in it or what it does. Like we've been saying for years, he's a Democrat at heart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 Trump wants to pass a health care law just because, having no clue what's in it or what it does. To say he is winnng! Clinton is competent, something that is important. And more corrupt that running our foreign policy based on his business interests? Your ignorance is the only thing making Trump look better than Hillary. Huh. You were a big fan when Obama did this exact same thing. And Hillary Clinton wasn't running foreign policy based on her personal interests? You're hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 No, Hillary was obviously the better choice, you are just WAY to partisan to see the obvious We'll never know because SHE LOST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 We'll never know because SHE LOST. Again...the fact that she lost belies any argument that she was remotely qualified for the presidency, given that she wasn't even qualified to defeat a candied yam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 30, 2017 Share Posted July 30, 2017 (edited) PJ desperately wanted her to win going back to 2008 at minimum. Never understood the devotion to her, but it is legit from him. It will make them feel better to have a woman President. Any woman. It's all about emotion with the left. Edited July 30, 2017 by Chef Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 30, 2017 Share Posted July 30, 2017 It will make them feel better to have a woman President. Any woman. What, Carter wasn't enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 30, 2017 Share Posted July 30, 2017 (edited) For REALZ? Chelsea Clinton, the epitome of 'white privilege', lectures white parents about racism NOTHING SUSPICIOUS HERE: Wasserman Schultz Seemingly Planned To Pay Suspect Even While He Lived In Pakistan. LIVE BY THE WOMAN CARD, DIE BY THE WOMAN CARD, EXPLAIN YOUR DEFEAT WITH THE WOMAN CARD: Hillary Clinton’s Memoir Will Be an Unapologetic Roast of Patriarchal Politics. . Edited July 30, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted July 30, 2017 Share Posted July 30, 2017 I've never seen a book where the question and the answer were on the cover. What happened? Hillary Clinton. Think she'll do book signings in Michigan and Wisconsin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 30, 2017 Share Posted July 30, 2017 http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/07/28/hillary-clinton-wants-to-tell-what-happened-in-her-new-book-which-wont-actually-tell-what-happened.html I've never seen a book where the question and the answer were on the cover. What happened? Hillary Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 31, 2017 Share Posted July 31, 2017 Best lack of editing since that Newsweek photo announcing her candidacy that looked like she was leaning on a walker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/hillary-clinton-hires-two-former-campaign-aides-for?utm_term=.vkd662E2K9#.paAXXwAwyK If at first you don't succeed, try again (and again) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 Told y'all, she is going to try to hijack the 2020 nomination. But if the party leaders give the word, the liberal media will go after her and sink her fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 Latest Judicial Watch document drop includes evidence Lynch used the pseudonym "Elizabeth Carlisle to compartmentalize correspondence/avoid FOIA requests. Lynch's grandmother's maiden name was Carlisle, first name Elizabeth. Large PDF, relevant page 163: http://media.aclj.org/pdf/Clinton-Lynch-Documents-1.pdf Nothing shady going on there... nothing at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 Latest Judicial Watch document drop includes evidence Lynch used the pseudonym "Elizabeth Carlisle to compartmentalize correspondence/avoid FOIA requests. Lynch's grandmother's maiden name was Carlisle, first name Elizabeth. Large PDF, relevant page 163: http://media.aclj.org/pdf/Clinton-Lynch-Documents-1.pdf Nothing shady going on there... nothing at all. Considering how long FOIA requests take to process and how often they're declined, avoiding FOIA requests is relatively minor. Avoiding Congressional oversight, however... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 Considering how long FOIA requests take to process and how often they're declined, avoiding FOIA requests is relatively minor. Avoiding Congressional oversight, however... That's better stated. The FOIA avoidance doesn't make much since considering these documents were acquired through a FOIA request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 And to your point, Tom, here's Lynch perjuring herself before Congress in November about her email habits: (I hate the graphics on this btw - but it's the shortest/most relevant segment I could find) https://youtu.be/MxZWSg0bq54?t=72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts