Taro T Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Because... not trump. No self-respecting Democrat could really have WANTED Hillary Clinton as a candidate. PJ desperately wanted her to win going back to 2008 at minimum. Never understood the devotion to her, but it is legit from him.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 PJ desperately wanted her to win going back to 2008 at minimum. Never understood the devotion to her, but it is legit from him. Key words: "self respecting"
Taro T Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 Key words: "self respecting" You don't think he respects himself?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 27, 2017 Posted July 27, 2017 You don't think he respects himself? How could he and be a Hillary fanboy
B-Man Posted July 27, 2017 Posted July 27, 2017 (edited) The most embarrassing thing about this CBS News puff piece isn't that it proclaims that "Hillary Clinton lets her 'guard down'" based on nothing more than that... ... the Introduction to her new memoir makes the statement "Now I'm letting my guard down." If CBS News cared about factual reporting, it would say "Hillary Clinton Claims She Is "Letting [Her] Guard Down' in Her New Memoir." Most of us won't believe that, and CBS must know that, so why would it ludicrously tout the book as if someone at CBS had read the book and found it revealing and forthcoming? Thank you Lord. Edited July 27, 2017 by B-Man
boyst Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 The most embarrassing thing about this CBS News puff piece isn't that it proclaims that "Hillary Clinton lets her 'guard down'" based on nothing more than that... ... the Introduction to her new memoir makes the statement "Now I'm letting my guard down." If CBS News cared about factual reporting, it would say "Hillary Clinton Claims She Is "Letting [Her] Guard Down' in Her New Memoir." Most of us won't believe that, and CBS must know that, so why would it ludicrously tout the book as if someone at CBS had read the book and found it revealing and forthcoming? Thank you Lord. uh, doofus. they "quoted" her so that means they are just simply quoting her. not claiming she let her guard down. they simply attempt to justify her claim. but, well done you. well done.
B-Man Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 uh, doofus. they "quoted" her so that means they are just simply quoting her. not claiming she let her guard down. they simply attempt to justify her claim. but, well done you. well done. Looks like Boyst is having a little comprehension problem...........well, it is getting late. You could either read it all , or you could respond with your usual bluster and call me names and threaten me........... You look silly either way.
boyst Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 Looks like Boyst is having a little comprehension problem...........well, it is getting late. You could either read it all , or you could respond with your usual bluster and call me names and threaten me........... You look silly either way. i don't threaten people. that's not cool to do. i am just calling the article a bit silly when it actually quotes the source and attempts to build a story around it. this happens all the time and while its not good, its a bit silly.
/dev/null Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 Dunno if this belongs in the Global Warming Cooling Climate Change (We Can Believe in) Disruption Chaos or Clinton thread, but here goes: https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/hurricane-hilary-to-stir-rough-surf-along-southern-california-coast/70002299
Gary M Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 Dunno if this belongs in the Global Warming Cooling Climate Change (We Can Believe in) Disruption Chaos or Clinton thread, but here goes: https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/hurricane-hilary-to-stir-rough-surf-along-southern-california-coast/70002299 No fear it is all hype, no substance.
Tiberius Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 The country would would have been much better off if she won and this embarrassing clown show we have now was not taking place.
GaryPinC Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 The country would would have been much better off if she won and this embarrassing clown show we have now was not taking place. Not really. We need real change in how our congress works together towards real legislation and how our government functions. The clown show is our best chance of that rather than the corrupt political whore.
Tiberius Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 Not really. We need real change in how our congress works together towards real legislation and how our government functions. The clown show is our best chance of that rather than the corrupt political whore. Yes really, Trump is a joke, corrupt and an idiot. Clinton is way better. She is intelligent. That kind of helps when making decisions
DC Tom Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 Yes really, Trump is a joke, corrupt and an idiot. Clinton is way better. She is intelligent. That kind of helps when making decisions They're both paranoid narcissists with delusions of godhood. The big difference is that people actually indulge and enable Clinton's delusions. She's only a "better" president if you're a fascist.
Tiberius Posted July 28, 2017 Posted July 28, 2017 They're both paranoid narcissists with delusions of godhood. The big difference is that people actually indulge and enable Clinton's delusions. She's only a "better" president if you're a fascist. No, Hillary was obviously the better choice, you are just WAY to partisan to see the obvious
KD in CA Posted July 29, 2017 Posted July 29, 2017 No, Hillary was obviously the better choice, you are just WAY to partisan to see the obvious If your measure of 'better' is 'which one makes fewer embarrassing social media posts', than yes, she was. But that doesn't change the fact she is every bit as narcissistic and delusional about her own self worth as Trump. And she is far -- like by a factor of ten - more corrupt.
DC Tom Posted July 29, 2017 Posted July 29, 2017 If your measure of 'better' is 'which one makes fewer embarrassing social media posts', than yes, she was. But that doesn't change the fact she is every bit as narcissistic and delusional about her own self worth as Trump. And she is far -- like by a factor of ten - more corrupt. And she is far - like by a factor of fifty - more enabled.
Tiberius Posted July 29, 2017 Posted July 29, 2017 If your measure of 'better' is 'which one makes fewer embarrassing social media posts', than yes, she was. But that doesn't change the fact she is every bit as narcissistic and delusional about her own self worth as Trump. And she is far -- like by a factor of ten - more corrupt. Trump wants to pass a health care law just because, having no clue what's in it or what it does. To say he is winnng! Clinton is competent, something that is important. And more corrupt that running our foreign policy based on his business interests? Your ignorance is the only thing making Trump look better than Hillary.
Recommended Posts