TakeYouToTasker Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. 1
DC Tom Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. That picture of her and mom...is Hillary wearing a couch?
Chef Jim Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 That picture of her and mom...is Hillary wearing a couch? No she's old. It's a davenport.
B-Man Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 but she had a distinguished 'career' as a journalist.......Chelsea Clinton Leaving Her Fake Job at NBC -- NYMag I'm mean ummm, as a lecturer................Chelsea Clinton's Second Fake Job: Saving the World I mean.........running the 'family' Foundation..........Chelsea Clinton gets a new job | TheHill
Chef Jim Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 but she had a distinguished 'career' as a journalist.......Chelsea Clinton Leaving Her Fake Job at NBC -- NYMag I'm mean ummm, as a lecturer................Chelsea Clinton's Second Fake Job: Saving the World I mean.........running the 'family' Foundation..........Chelsea Clinton gets a new job | TheHill Based on the experience of the current POTUS she's right on track.
Nanker Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 That picture of her and mom...is Hillary wearing a couch? No she's old. It's a davenport. I thought it was an old pair of Web Hubble's U-trow.
4merper4mer Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. At least with royalty the leadership is known ahead of time. With this crap we all have to sit through the faux process where the electorate gets a say. There are 300 million people in this country. Why on Earth is there even a story about a 35 year old prepping for a future run?
Dorkington Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 I'm going to write her in during the primaries.
DC Tom Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 I'm going to write her in during the primaries. I'll write in Jenna Bush; we can cancel each other's vote.
Chef Jim Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 I'll write in Jenna Bush; we can cancel each other's vote. That is the only reason I was sad to see Bush leave office. No more Bush twin stories.
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted January 27, 2016 Posted January 27, 2016 Beavis- "hehhuhuh you have braces" "I have braces too"
boyst Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 i've always wanted to punch her in the face and i barely know anything about her to even have an opinion. this thought has always bothered me. she just looks like someone who needs a punch in the face. what is wrong with me? either way, it's sad because quite clearly in 25-30 years one of the Obama girls will be running for something.
keepthefaith Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 At least with royalty the leadership is known ahead of time. With this crap we all have to sit through the faux process where the electorate gets a say. There are 300 million people in this country. Why on Earth is there even a story about a 35 year old prepping for a future run? Just as you said, royalty is known ahead of time.
....lybob Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 i've always wanted to punch her in the face and i barely know anything about her to even have an opinion. this thought has always bothered me. she just looks like someone who needs a punch in the face. what is wrong with me? either way, it's sad because quite clearly in 25-30 years one of the Obama girls will be running for something. We will need the equivalent of the Manhattan Project in psychological research and I don't know if we have enough people with the courage and iron stomachs to find out.
DC Tom Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 Just as you said, royalty is known ahead of time. Royalty also usually invokes the divine right of kings. Hillary's not claiming a divine right...just a manifest destiny.
boyst Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 We will need the equivalent of the Manhattan Project in psychological research and I don't know if we have enough people with the courage and iron stomachs to find out. i don't know if it is appropriate that i laugh at that or not.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 Royalty also usually invokes the divine right of kings. Hillary's not claiming a divine right...just a manifest destiny. Sexist.
DC Tom Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 i don't know if it is appropriate that i laugh at that or not. First question to answer once we get the project set up.
/dev/null Posted January 28, 2016 Posted January 28, 2016 I'll write in Jenna Bush; we can cancel each other's vote. My vote is for Barbara the younger That is the only reason I was sad to see Bush leave office. No more Bush twin stories.
Tiberius Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/chelsea-clinton-gearing-white-house-bid-article-1.2510390 I, for one, have zero appetite for this sort of political dynasty. It absolutely reeks of royalty. Royalty? Using name recognition seems to be a pretty American and republican thing.
Recommended Posts