boater Posted January 24, 2016 Author Posted January 24, 2016 (edited) Explain how winning percentage determines whether or not a team moves. Imagine if the 2019 Bills have missed the playoffs again for X straight years. I'd say the fan base is dead, the cash flow is dead, and the Bills are gone. You explain otherwise. (X years.. would that be 20? .. it's to depressing to think about) Edited January 24, 2016 by boater
DC Tom Posted January 24, 2016 Posted January 24, 2016 Imagine if the 2019 Bills have missed the playoffs again for X straight years. I'd say the fan base is dead, the cash flow is dead, and the Bills are gone. You explain otherwise. (X years.. would that be 20? .. it's to depressing to think about) And how often does it happen that a team moves because attendance is poor?
John from Riverside Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 Keep wishing that. I agree with you for the next year or so.. then all bets are off. Your not serious about this No....for several different reasons
May Day 10 Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 If they start out 2-4 or worse next year watch for moving trux
Saxum Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 ..is the Don Esmonde lede I agree with most of what he says at http://www.buffalonews.com/columns/donn-esmonde/nfl-abandonment-of-st-louis-ups-the-ante-in-buffalo-20160123 Including the open ended statement: "Buffalo will thankfully be spared St. Louis’ fate. But in the game of stadium checkers, the pressure is on to keep up with the Kroenkes." I think the current pressure to move is "low" ... but if the Bills lose the next two seasons, the pressure is a red hot blowout to move. Opinion. Opinion - you already expect the Bills to leave so get on the boat out of town now! Fans are not dumb you take any Cowboys fan or fan in one of these multi billion dollar play pens and bring them to a Buffalo Game day experience and they will tell you hands down what happens here and places like Greenbay and K.C. is special. Most feel that what happens here is fun and what a real game day experience should be about. So stand up and be proud. I for one am thankful for a awesome game day experience and how close the stands are to the field and the whole atmosphere out at the Ralph. There is no place on game day I would rather be then right there. When it's too small and doesn't make enough money for Jerry Jones it's Just right for us. Boy Marv Levi would be proud. GO BILLS I agree about the game day experience vs commercial but they are far too many drunks and anti-social people at the games. There are people so drunk they can barely walk in stadium. It is a good game day experience which could be great. This is similar to another story The Buffalo News has run in the past few weeks by a female. I think it's their typical hate on the Pegula agenda because they don't kiss their ass. When they remodel the stadium they should put the press box above the sewage tank. http://www.theofficialreview.com/nfl-cross-ownership-rules/ Check this out. Pegula would have to sell, transfer, or move the Sabres will the Bills to relocate. Both Terry and Kim own the Bills so he couldnt do the old transfer ownership to his wife in order to move. Pegula will keep the Bills in western NY and most likely try to go downtown IMO. He would be smart to build a dome stadium near the Falls which could be used for multiple events over the year. Maybe even connect a casino to it. They could do the divorce with each taking an asset.
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 I have like 0 respect for anything buffalo news, except Tyler Dunne. The bills aren't going anywhere, at least in the next 5 years. Only way I remotely see it happening is if the Ralph has extreme deteoriation and cannot be used and there is no corporate welfare/public assistance for a new downtown stadium and the bills essentially become homeless without a new stadium. That's the only logical way I could see a move happen, to a city like San antonio/austin, orlando, las Vegas or portland owned by pegula, or sold off and moved wherever. This is dumb. And for the first time in my adult life I feel like the bills have a secure future. Thank you pegula family.
What a Tuel Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 (edited) Imagine if the 2019 Bills have missed the playoffs again for X straight years. I'd say the fan base is dead, the cash flow is dead, and the Bills are gone. You explain otherwise. (X years.. would that be 20? .. it's to depressing to think about) What is the difference between 16 and 20? Fans are suddenly going to come to their senses? I'm still wondering how if we go with your theory that greed is the main factor here, why winning within 2 years would make Pegula change his mind about moving? It is clearly more profitable in places like LA. Why does winning change his greed? You think he would get swept up in the glory of winning? I just don't get it. Moving doesn't mean he will win more so.... Also the idea that a new generation of Bills fans that won't accept losing won't buy tickets, and they are replacing the ones that will (16 years) within even the next 5 years is ridiculous. I understand you think it makes sense in your head, but it just doesn't work like that, and as others have said, ticket sales are a small part of the equation. Edited January 25, 2016 by What a Tuel
Doc Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 I have like 0 respect for anything buffalo news, except Tyler Dunne. The bills aren't going anywhere, at least in the next 5 years. Only way I remotely see it happening is if the Ralph has extreme deteoriation and cannot be used and there is no corporate welfare/public assistance for a new downtown stadium and the bills essentially become homeless without a new stadium. That's the only logical way I could see a move happen, to a city like San antonio/austin, orlando, las Vegas or portland owned by pegula, or sold off and moved wherever. This is dumb. And for the first time in my adult life I feel like the bills have a secure future. Thank you pegula family. I'd put money on them not leaving while Kim or Terry are still alive. And since Kim is my age, that means they should be staying in Buffalo for the rest of my life.
Mr. WEO Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 the idea that Terry Pegula would move the Bills shows one of two things: 1) complete and total ignorance 2) a desire to bring people down Maybe it's both. More like: 3) trying to generate clicks Is it too late to point out that the article is not about the Pegulas moving the Bills to LA?
KOKBILLS Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 So in other words, doomed? Apparently... We just can't seem to escape the doom...
Doc Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 Is it too late to point out that the article is not about the Pegulas moving the Bills to LA? Maybe not LA. But what do Kroenke, STL, and the Rams have to do with the Pegulas, Buffalo, and the Bills?
Captain Hindsight Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 http://www.theofficialreview.com/nfl-cross-ownership-rules/ Check this out. Pegula would have to sell, transfer, or move the Sabres will the Bills to relocate. Both Terry and Kim own the Bills so he couldnt do the old transfer ownership to his wife in order to move. Pegula will keep the Bills in western NY and most likely try to go downtown IMO. He would be smart to build a dome stadium near the Falls which could be used for multiple events over the year. Maybe even connect a casino to it. I doubt the NFL would go for that
That's No Moon Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 I doubt the NFL would go for that There is a casino on the Hollywood Park site that Kroenke is building on. It was part of the former horse track on that site. It's currently undergoing renovation and the casino's own website mentions a two year plan to "evolve and grow into our new home". There will absolutely be a casino on that property if not directly connected to the stadium. There's no way the casino operators would pull an approved, operating, casino out of the middle of LA.
bbb Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 The pro leagues are starting to embrace gambling now.
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 http://www.theofficialreview.com/nfl-cross-ownership-rules/ Check this out. Pegula would have to sell, transfer, or move the Sabres will the Bills to relocate. Both Terry and Kim own the Bills so he couldnt do the old transfer ownership to his wife in order to move. Pegula will keep the Bills in western NY and most likely try to go downtown IMO. He would be smart to build a dome stadium near the Falls which could be used for multiple events over the year. Maybe even connect a casino to it. The Bills in a dome feels very wrong to me.
boater Posted January 25, 2016 Author Posted January 25, 2016 Is it too late to point out that the article is not about the Pegulas moving the Bills to LA? No it's not too late. The message I took from the article: the Bills are in a Pegs honeymoon period, but will be under increasing pressure to make some money for mothership NFL. The way to provide the NFL more money could mean moving. or it could mean a new stadium. I hope Pegs straight-arms the league and sits tight. That will be easy to do if they are winning on the field.
PromoTheRobot Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 I doubt the NFL would go for that This is the NFL's stand on gambling.
GG Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 No it's not too late. The message I took from the article: the Bills are in a Pegs honeymoon period, but will be under increasing pressure to make some money for mothership NFL. The way to provide the NFL more money could mean moving. or it could mean a new stadium. I hope Pegs straight-arms the league and sits tight. That will be easy to do if they are winning on the field. When has that not been the case for any team that's not maximizing its potential revenues? Jax is a bit of a different case because NFL is using Khan as the spearhead for London expansion. A new stadium is a near certainty. The only thing that's still to be determined is how it's going to be financed. That's what the other article referenced, which is slightly different than Esmonde's piece. Her concern was using large taxpayer contributions for the stadium, and she's right.
Recommended Posts