The Big Cat Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 http://twitter.com/MatthewFairburn/status/684083258968174593 Presumably it was broken when he popped Fitz on the Lawson pick. WARRIOR
boyst Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I clearly believe an incentive in his contract was motivation
John from Riverside Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Meanwhile you have guys like Jason Peters taking himself out of games
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Didn't someone question his heart, and compare him to Haynesworth last week? This guy is a straight baller.
LOVEMESOMEBILLS Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 He has a hammock in his living room That's what I was thinking.
The Big Cat Posted January 4, 2016 Author Posted January 4, 2016 I clearly believe an incentive in his contract was motivation What reachable incentive could have possibly remained outstanding with less than a quarter to play in the final game?
sodbuster Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 He has a hammock in his living roomI had one of my single nest hammocks in my living room for a while.
NoSaint Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 What reachable incentive could have possibly remained outstanding with less than a quarter to play in the final game? im not arguing thats the reason he did but any number of sack, tackle, or snap incentives could have existed.
The Big Cat Posted January 4, 2016 Author Posted January 4, 2016 im not arguing thats the reason he did but any number of sack, tackle, or snap incentives could have existed. and i'd contend that any meaningful sack incentive was out of reach and any tackle or snap was already reached. may be tackle. may be.
buffalonian Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 http://twitter.com/MatthewFairburn/status/684083258968174593 Presumably it was broken when he popped Fitz on the Lawson pick. WARRIOR I think it was earlier in the second half. I remember him limping off the field. That makes his hit on Fitz even more impressive.
YoloinOhio Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 I think it was earlier in the second half. I remember him limping off the field. That makes his hit on Fitz even more impressive.he broke it in 3rd qtrhttp://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2016/1/4/10709598/marcell-dareus-buffalo-bills-foot-injury-broken
chaccof Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 He has a hammock in his living room That is so awesome.....I asked my wife about it and she said no......
Deranged Rhino Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 That is so awesome.....I asked my wife about it and she said no......
montanafan Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 With all due respect to the way Sammy played, I thought Dareus' hit on Fitz was the play of the game. His it caused the ball to flutter and hence the interception, that for all practical purposes ended it. As big a play as Marios strip of Rodgers in the end zone last year.
Recommended Posts