Tommy Callahan Posted September 24, 2023 Posted September 24, 2023 Lol. There is no war on women. It's not 1950 anymore What we have is a victimhood mentality. Martyr mentality. It's defective
Doc Posted September 24, 2023 Posted September 24, 2023 The "war on women" is actually "we can't abort our babies anytime before a few hours after birth." 1
BillStime Posted September 24, 2023 Posted September 24, 2023 15 minutes ago, Doc said: The "war on women" is actually "we can't abort our babies anytime before a few hours after birth." And once again, you remind us that you are in fact, not a doctor. thanks for playing, doc! 18 minutes ago, Chris farley said: Lol. There is no war on women. It's not 1950 anymore What we have is a victimhood mentality. Martyr mentality. It's defective What are red states doing today? What bubble do you live in?
Tommy Callahan Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 ^^^^^^^^^^ pure lies and fear being pushed By shady funded PACS and they just eat it up and stay angry.
All_Pro_Bills Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 Advocating and embracing the practice of allowing biological men to masquerade (if you prefer, "identify) as women which results in disadvantaging biological women in many areas including competitive sports is "war on women". That's totally a liberal thing. 1 1 1
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: ^^^^^^^^^^ pure lies and fear being pushed By shady funded PACS and they just eat it up and stay angry. Oh, LIES? Where is the LIE? You freaks can't handle the truth about your party. It's a fking terrorist organization. Also, I don't give a 💩 about your nonstop biching about PACS when you pick and choose to acknowledge the ones that make you UNCOMFORTABLE. Facts matter B. 1
Beast Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 On 12/23/2015 at 11:48 AM, Tiberius said: Women consumers, that is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/12066820/New-Gender-Tax-study-shows-women-are-charged-more-for-being-woman.html A gender tax! how do you afford it? 2
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Advocating and embracing the practice of allowing biological men to masquerade (if you prefer, "identify) as women which results in disadvantaging biological women in many areas including competitive sports is "war on women". That's totally a liberal thing. Seriously, get out of here. DEFLECT because you CAN'T HANDLE the truth. 1 minute ago, Beast said: how do you afford it? Boy, this topic really triggered the cult.
Tiberius Posted October 27, 2023 Author Posted October 27, 2023 41 minutes ago, Beast said: how do you afford it? Your avatar is a drink. Ya
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 16 minutes ago, BillStime said: Oh, LIES? Where is the LIE? You freaks can't handle the truth about your party. It's a fking terrorist organization. Also, I don't give a 💩 about your nonstop biching about PACS when you pick and choose to acknowledge the ones that make you UNCOMFORTABLE. Facts matter B. I watched the clip. I read the text above from @voteAnnJohnson. She indicated she wants to "exempt people for sexual assault exams". I googled HB4 and see that it is a contentious issue, dealing with how law enforcement in Texas is expected to handle individuals once it is revealed they are not legal residents of the United States. I can't seem to find anything specific about what she is talking about. Help me out here. What is she talking about? 1
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 41 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I watched the clip. I read the text above from @voteAnnJohnson. She indicated she wants to "exempt people for sexual assault exams". I googled HB4 and see that it is a contentious issue, dealing with how law enforcement in Texas is expected to handle individuals once it is revealed they are not legal residents of the United States. I can't seem to find anything specific about what she is talking about. Help me out here. What is she talking about? I can't find the actual amendments in question either - but here is more debate about it.
Wacka Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 2 hours ago, BillStime said: You freaks can't handle the truth about your party. It's a fking terrorist organization. Ok Jack Nicholson. 3
boyst Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 On 12/23/2015 at 12:14 PM, Deranged Rhino said: On 12/23/2015 at 1:51 PM, IDBillzFan said: I doubt this is an issue for Hillary since she clearly spends all her money wearing men's clothing anyway On 12/23/2015 at 2:42 PM, Azalin said: It's ridiculous that they call it a "gender tax". On 12/24/2015 at 9:31 AM, keepthefaith said: No man would be caught dead wearing what she wears. I think she is being lobbied by the Broyhill furniture company who makes her pant suits from leftover couch fabric. On 12/24/2015 at 9:53 AM, DC Tom said: Simplistic presentation for simplistic minds. A toast to all of those who moved on. 1
yall Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 3 hours ago, Beast said: how do you afford it? Why not just buy the cheapest razor, shampoo etc.? Who is at fault if the consumer is making poor decisions?
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 2 hours ago, BillStime said: I can't find the actual amendments in question either - but here is more debate about it. Thanks for the additional clips, but I'm confused as to why you linked it before without understanding the issue it purported addressed? Your commentary before and after the initial link included aggressive commentary (freaks, truth, not giving a sh*T), and the clip you shared (and the text from Twitter) is quite unclear. In the most recent clip shared, Rep Spiller explains his rationale and thinking, and Rep Johnson responds. It's an emotional subject, but as one of the few centrists on the board, I can see elements of both positions that seem logical.
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Thanks for the additional clips, but I'm confused as to why you linked it before without understanding the issue it purported addressed? Your commentary before and after the initial link included aggressive commentary (freaks, truth, not giving a sh*T), and the clip you shared (and the text from Twitter) is quite unclear. In the most recent clip shared, Rep Spiller explains his rationale and thinking, and Rep Johnson responds. It's an emotional subject, but as one of the few centrists on the board, I can see elements of both positions that seem logical. The War on Women is real. I know, not in your fantasy world - but it is real. You can do your research next time champ.
Recommended Posts