Tiberius Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 Women consumers, that is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/12066820/New-Gender-Tax-study-shows-women-are-charged-more-for-being-woman.html A gender tax!
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 So women pay more for their clothes and beauty supplies than men do and you think this is a war on women? Seriously?
Tiberius Posted December 23, 2015 Author Posted December 23, 2015 So women pay more for their clothes and beauty supplies than men do and you think this is a war on women? Seriously? You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places!
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places! You've lost it.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places! :lol:
IDBillzFan Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 I doubt this is an issue for Hillary since she clearly spends all her money wearing men's clothing anyway
Azalin Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 It's ridiculous that they call it a "gender tax".
unbillievable Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Sports equipment for women cost far less than the men's version. It's about the product. Despite what the feminists want us to believe, men and women do THINK (and prioritize) differently.
Tiberius Posted December 24, 2015 Author Posted December 24, 2015 It's ridiculous that they call it a "gender tax".It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight.
keepthefaith Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 I doubt this is an issue for Hillary since she clearly spends all her money wearing men's clothing anyway No man would be caught dead wearing what she wears. I think she is being lobbied by the Broyhill furniture company who makes her pant suits from leftover couch fabric.
Azalin Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight. It's not needless detail to characterize something as it really is. How can an issue be properly addressed if you treat it as something it isn't?
Tiberius Posted December 24, 2015 Author Posted December 24, 2015 It's not needless detail to characterize something as it really is. How can an issue be properly addressed if you treat it as something it isn't?Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison
Azalin Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison Absolutely, and they're also smart enough to see it as a complete mischaracterization.
DC Tom Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight. Simplistic presentation for simplistic minds.
Chef Jim Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison So why do you think this is happening?
unbillievable Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 I'm having a hard time figuring out their methodology for this survey. What products do they associate exclusively for each gender but have versions for the opposite sex? Fashion? -anything else? I would also like to point out that women often cross over to "men's" products, while men rarely do the same. Also, designers create items that mimic men's clothes created exclusively for women- boyfriend jeans (which is downright idiotic)- then charge more for it. Gullibility tax?
3rdnlng Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 I'm having a hard time figuring out their methodology for this survey. What products do they associate exclusively for each gender but have versions for the opposite sex? Fashion? -anything else? I would also like to point out that women often cross over to "men's" products, while men rarely do the same. Also, designers create items that mimic men's clothes created exclusively for women- boyfriend jeans (which is downright idiotic)- then charge more for it. Gullibility tax? I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she could get the old prices for his her products. Unintended consequences are a B word.
/dev/null Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she xecould get the old prices for his her xerproducts. Unintended consequences are a B word.
Nanker Posted December 25, 2015 Posted December 25, 2015 Hillary supports the war on women, especially the women who slept with Bill - either consensually or by force. She attacked them with more vigor than she did the young girl in Arkansas that was raped by a client of hers whom she got off and laughed about. She pays her female employees 76% of what her male counterparts get paid.
boyst Posted December 25, 2015 Posted December 25, 2015 I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she could get thed prices for his her products. Unintended consequences are a B word. Her !@#$ is upset about paying high costs for hygiene products I doubt many here get the reference. also 'f you Gary. 1
Recommended Posts