3rdnlng Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 F it, I don't care about grammar or mistakes Obviously, you have no pride. That's going to be a problem for you once you get a job.
Tiberius Posted December 24, 2015 Author Posted December 24, 2015 No that's not what you said but they have jobs through corporate exploitation correct? Created by the government. It's interesting. Calvert Funds is one of the top mutual funds in the socially responsible investment space. They screen out lots of companies for improper governance and that typically includes their supply chain. However Apple is the largest holding in their Large Cap Core Fund. http://www.greenmoneyjournal.com/may-2015/apple/ Define "exploitation" I never said that. If they are free market jobs, I am alright with that of course. Why do you always create straw man arguments? Is your view of things so demented that the truth won't simply support it? What does that mutual fund charge, if you just happen to know, if not, don't worry?
Chef Jim Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Define "exploitation" I never said that. If they are free market jobs, I am alright with that of course. Why do you always create straw man arguments? Is your view of things so demented that the truth won't simply support it? What does that mutual fund charge, if you just happen to know, if not, don't worry? Exploitation? Treating someone poorly for personal gain. Do you think Apple has exploiting people for their own personal gain? According to their site the expense ratio is 1.30%. Pretty high. SRI funds typically suck but since moving to the Bay Area I've had lots of people that want them.
Tiberius Posted December 24, 2015 Author Posted December 24, 2015 1) Exploitation? Treating someone poorly for personal gain. 2) Do you think Apple has exploiting people for their own personal gain? 3) According to their site the expense ratio is 1.30%. Pretty high. SRI funds typically suck but since moving to the Bay Area I've had lots of people that want them. 1) That seems like a pretty relative term, don't you think? 2) Good thing you are not liberal, or our spelling/grammar cop would give you a ticket, but its ok, he only points it out to not Conservatives. Worthless POS. Apple isn't a person. And I don't think they would see it that way. 3) Way too high! I'll stick with Vanguard
Chef Jim Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 1) That seems like a pretty relative term, don't you think? 2) Good thing you are not liberal, or our spelling/grammar cop would give you a ticket, but its ok, he only points it out to not Conservatives. Worthless POS. Apple isn't a person. And I don't think they would see it that way. 3) Way too high! I'll stick with Vanguard 1. No 2. Well I changed it from is exploiting to has because to tell you the truth I don't know if they are anymore but the have in the past 3. Good luck. Expense ratios mean nothing when you do it on your own. The biggest threat to people reaching their financial goals is themselves.
birdog1960 Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Subcontracting to Foxconn lets Apple have their cake & eat it too. They take advantage of the low cost of quasi-slave labor with the deniability of doing it thru a third party. With an added bonus of the PR campaign to improve conditions What exactly is quasi slavery? Sort of like confederate slavery x no bull whips , buying , selling and separating families, raping the females and giving saltpeter to the males? Other than those and a few other barbaric, shameful things they're exactly the same, right?
Alaska Darin Posted December 25, 2015 Posted December 25, 2015 What exactly is quasi slavery? Sort of like confederate slavery x no bull whips , buying , selling and separating families, raping the females and giving saltpeter to the males? Other than those and a few other barbaric, shameful things they're exactly the same, right? You are such a hypocritical douche bag.
boyst Posted December 25, 2015 Posted December 25, 2015 What other issues/movements do you feel this way about or is slavery just your B word du jour? #kony2012
3rdnlng Posted December 25, 2015 Posted December 25, 2015 1) That seems like a pretty relative term, don't you think? 2) Good thing you are not liberal, or our spelling/grammar cop would give you a ticket, but its ok, he only points it out to not Conservatives. Worthless POS. Apple isn't a person. And I don't think they would see it that way. 3) Way too high! I'll stick with Vanguard The problem is, with nearly every one of your posts, it is necessary to decipher them because of your ignorant use of the English language. On top of that you state that you couldn't care less about grammar and spelling. That only proves that you are incapable of concise thought and are nothing but a loose cannon with no personal pride. It might not mean much to you now, but when you get a job your inability to make sense and express yourself will be a problem. Maybe just practicing phrases like "go large"? or "do you want fries with that"? will get you by.
Tiberius Posted December 25, 2015 Author Posted December 25, 2015 1. No 2. Well I changed it from is exploiting to has because to tell you the truth I don't know if they are anymore but the have in the past 3. Good luck. Expense ratios mean nothing when you do it on your own. The biggest threat to people reaching their financial goals is themselves. 3. I'm doing great. No need of luck. You are such a hypocritical douche bag. No, he's just right, and that makes your simple self angry. Or, more angry, I should say. Life seems to really frustrate you
Deranged Rhino Posted December 25, 2015 Posted December 25, 2015 (edited) No, auctually millions have been lifted out of poverty and that definition, while yes slavery, is a matter of enforcing laws against slavery. And Apple is not starting a civil war to spread slavery it's actually trying to help eliminate it. Thumbs up! Good postGators logic in this thread: Destroying history is good -- like ISIS does Slavery lifts people out of poverty. good grief you're a mess in the head. What exactly is quasi slavery? Sort of like confederate slavery x no bull whips , buying , selling and separating families, raping the females and giving saltpeter to the males? Other than those and a few other barbaric, shameful things they're exactly the same, right?You're still not going to offer a response to my questions? Man, what an intellectual coward you are. I've never really had anything against you, but this has been a shameful performance in this thread. Pity. And if you truly knew your history in this area you'd know those examples were not the norms, not even close to the norms, in the antebellum south. Slaves were too valuable to purposefully harm. Didn't mean it didn't happen but they were outliers. Edited December 25, 2015 by Deranged Rhino
DC Tom Posted December 25, 2015 Posted December 25, 2015 Gators logic in this thread: Destroying history is good -- like ISIS does Slavery lifts people out of poverty. good grief you're a mess in the head. You're still not going to offer a response to my questions? Man, what an intellectual coward you are. I've never really had anything against you, but this has been a shameful performance in this thread. Pity. And if you truly knew your history in this area you'd know those examples were not the norms, not even close to the norms, in the antebellum south. Slaves were too valuable to purposefully harm. Didn't mean it didn't happen but they were outliers. Slavery lifts people out of poverty...but it's evil.
boyst Posted December 26, 2015 Posted December 26, 2015 Gators logic in this thread: Destroying history is good -- like ISIS does Slavery lifts people out of poverty. good grief you're a mess in the head. You're still not going to offer a response to my questions? Man, what an intellectual coward you are. I've never really had anything against you, but this has been a shameful performance in this thread. Pity. And if you truly knew your history in this area you'd know those examples were not the norms, not even close to the norms, in the antebellum south. Slaves were too valuable to purposefully harm. Didn't mean it didn't happen but they were outliers. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/15/adrian-peterson-slavery-nfl_n_836090.html "It's modern-day slavery, you know? People kind of laugh at that, but there are people working at regular jobs who get treated the same way, too. With all the money," Peterson continued. "The owners are trying to get a different percentage, and bring in more money."
birdog1960 Posted December 26, 2015 Posted December 26, 2015 (edited) [quote name="Deranged Rhino" post="3820154" timestamp="1451070192 And if you truly knew your history in this area you'd know those examples were not the norms, not even close to the norms, in the antebellum south. Slaves were too valuable to purposefully harm. Didn't mean it didn't happen but they were outliers. I'm wondering where your thesis was published. Sons of the confederacy quarterly ? Physical abuse of southern slaves was rampant. S Carolina even wrote laws restricting discipline to whipping and chaining while seeing the need to expressly forbid burning, castrating and scalding. Torture implements were even devised specifically for use with American slaves. The references are plentiful and easy to find. I can't find one that doesn't make the statement that the cruelty was widespread. Perhaps you can link your novel thesis that these slaveholders were generally good to their property. While you're at it cite similar examples of such abuse on Apple employees Edited December 26, 2015 by birdog1960
Maury Ballstein Posted December 26, 2015 Posted December 26, 2015 I'm wondering where your thesis was published. Sons of the confederacy quarterly ? Physical abuse of southern slaves was rampant. S Carolina even wrote laws restricting discipline to whipping and chaining while seeing the need to expressly forbid burning, castrating and scalding. Torture implements were even devised specifically for use with American slaves. The references are plentiful and easy to find. I can't find one that doesn't make the statement that the cruelty was widespread. Perhaps you can link your novel thesis that these slaveholders were generally good to their property. While you're at it cite similar examples of such abuse on Apple employees 445am ? Up all night with the booger sugar ? Would explain things.
Tiberius Posted December 26, 2015 Author Posted December 26, 2015 I'm wondering where your thesis was published. Sons of the confederacy quarterly ? Physical abuse of southern slaves was rampant. S Carolina even wrote laws restricting discipline to whipping and chaining while seeing the need to expressly forbid burning, castrating and scalding. Torture implements were even devised specifically for use with American slaves. The references are plentiful and easy to find. I can't find one that doesn't make the statement that the cruelty was widespread. Perhaps you can link your novel thesis that these slaveholders were generally good to their property. While you're at it cite similar examples of such abuse on Apple employees Arguing with Rhino is useless, his ignorance is only matched by his impulsiveness. He posts and defends professional conspiracy theorists, what else needs pointed out? I can't tell if he's insane, really stupid or has a deep maturity issue. You'll notice how not many defend his "logic" but just egg him on in. Now he's arguing slaves were well treated I'm wondering where your thesis was published. Sons of the confederacy quarterly ? Physical abuse of southern slaves was rampant. S Carolina even wrote laws restricting discipline to whipping and chaining while seeing the need to expressly forbid burning, castrating and scalding. Torture implements were even devised specifically for use with American slaves. The references are plentiful and easy to find. I can't find one that doesn't make the statement that the cruelty was widespread. Perhaps you can link your novel thesis that these slaveholders were generally good to their property. While you're at it cite similar examples of such abuse on Apple employees Hey Tom, birddog is correct here, isn't he? Or do you agree with Greggy that since slaves were valuable like horses they were treated well. Heck, what human wouldn't work for free in return for a smile and thank you? And slaves as a population were becoming less black as the years went on. Wonder why that was...
birdog1960 Posted December 26, 2015 Posted December 26, 2015 445am ? Up all night with the booger sugar ? Would explain things.it was 9:45 in London
Wacka Posted December 26, 2015 Posted December 26, 2015 (edited) Gatorman always liked Big Brother.Doubleplusgood. Edited December 26, 2015 by Wacka
birdog1960 Posted December 27, 2015 Posted December 27, 2015 Hey Tom, birddog is correct here, isn't he? Or do you agree with Greggy that since slaves were valuable like horses they were treated well. Heck, what human wouldn't work for free in return for a smile and thank you? And slaves as a population were becoming less black as the years went on. Wonder why that was... Hmmm, why would you cede the role of judge to Tom?... Unless...
Tiberius Posted December 27, 2015 Author Posted December 27, 2015 Hmmm, why would you cede the role of judge to Tom?... Unless... Just to see if he will stick up for him as he usually does. Greggy's latest is almost on par with being a holocaust denier. Slaves were not harmed? Wow!
Recommended Posts