Leroi Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 thats because his fate is tied to making the playoffs. bills in , he stays. bills out, whaley out. I'd be okay with this. This year is the window of opportunity when the next step must be taken, there must be consequences to actions. Imo
GG Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 So they're willing to spend whatever to get a super bowl, but won't cut fan favorites, even if they're over the hill? I understand wanting to treat your business partners with respect and like they're family, but getting upset about football decisions because they might conflict with marketing campaigns is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard of. If it comes out that this is true and they fire Whaley due to the outcry of cutting a 34 year and the conflict with the marketing campaign, than we are f**ked as a fan base for the next 30 years. Can you also show us how this hurt M&T bank? I saw Tim Graham post how cutting Fred a day before the marketing campaign came out was embarrassing and made a big deal about it. I told him that is stupid and basing football decisions on anything but football performance is moronic. I think that the M&T discussion was beaten to death in the original Fred thread, and kdiggz source confirms a lot of speculation that went on in that thread. It's becoming more clear that Pegulas didn't appreciate how Whaley approached that move, and it will be part of his overall evaluation at the end of the season. This could be a parallel to why Lafontaine was shown the door after he allegedly crossed Kim on handling a personnel matter. Sometimes it's not what people do, it's how they do it.
26CornerBlitz Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 I think that the M&T discussion was beaten to death in the original Fred thread, and kdiggz source confirms a lot of speculation that went on in that thread. It's becoming more clear that Pegulas didn't appreciate how Whaley approached that move, and it will be part of his overall evaluation at the end of the season. This could be a parallel to why Lafontaine was shown the door after he allegedly crossed Kim on handling a personnel matter. Sometimes it's not what people do, it's how they do it. People are acting as if he cut Fred and then told the Pegulas and the coaches afterward. That's not what happened as I recall. A GM is supposed to make football decisions and that's exactly what he did. Fred was expendable.
machine gun kelly Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 Agreed, the irony is that I think that Whaley is a lot better at his job than Rex is at his. KJ- Couldn't agree more. Whaley is the stronger link here vs. Rex. The critical question always is "ok, if you can him, who is better?" Whaley has the Steelers pedigree, and has shown so many good calls over the last few years. I was about to go through the Hughes trade, and other late hits like Karlos Williams, but too many to share and somebody will find misses thinking a GM is supposed to hit 100% of the time which never happens. Don't forget Whaley did not pick Rex. Pegula did.
808 Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 not keeping whaley i believe would be a mistake. but i am also at the point that i don't care what happens i just want to win. I'm tired of losing. in a league with this much parody the bills have been able to continue to be inept. just win thats i care about
Kelly the Dog Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 I think that the M&T discussion was beaten to death in the original Fred thread, and kdiggz source confirms a lot of speculation that went on in that thread. It's becoming more clear that Pegulas didn't appreciate how Whaley approached that move, and it will be part of his overall evaluation at the end of the season. This could be a parallel to why Lafontaine was shown the door after he allegedly crossed Kim on handling a personnel matter. Sometimes it's not what people do, it's how they do it. According to Whaley he spoke to Rex and Roman and the Pegulas before he released Fred.
LA Grant Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 It would be foolish to get rid of Whaley after this year, I think. This past year was his best off-season. Best draft so far. Great choices in free agency. I think Rex has very good GM instincts (Taylor, Darby, and probably Karlos) but I wouldn't trust him to run the whole show. Similarly, Whaley is very good at certain things but has had some foolish gambits (betting too much on EJ and Sammy when we could've been more conservative and better off). I think Rex and Whaley balance each other out.
FireChan Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 According to Whaley he spoke to Rex and Roman and the Pegulas before he released Fred. According to the criminal, he's innocent. If the Bills are dumb enough to fire Whaley, another NFL team will be glad to have him as one of their executives. He won't be unemployed for very long. Hopefully he goes to the Pats. He could be voted the best paper GM of all time, and they'll miss the playoffs for his entire tenure
GG Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 People are acting as if he cut Fred and then told the Pegulas and the coaches afterward. That's not what happened as I recall. A GM is supposed to make football decisions and that's exactly what he did. Fred was expendable. He obviously bypassed some chain of command, otherwise it wouldn't be an issue still. Even if he informed Pegula, but kept Brandon in the dark, that doesn't bode well for him to bypass his boss. There wouldn't have been as much finger pointing inside the organization if he went through the proper channels. Apparently he didn't. I'll ask you. Name the last good to great GM who was left hanging without a contract extension into the offseason.
Kelly the Dog Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 According to the criminal, he's innocent. That's not applicable. He WOULD have reason to be fired if he came out in public and said yeah I discussed it with the Pegulas first when they would be the only ones that knew if he really did or not.
26CornerBlitz Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 He obviously bypassed some chain of command, otherwise it wouldn't be an issue still. Even if he informed Pegula, but kept Brandon in the dark, that doesn't bode well for him to bypass his boss. There wouldn't have been as much finger pointing inside the organization if he went through the proper channels. Apparently he didn't. I'll ask you. Name the last good to great GM who was left hanging without a contract extension into the offseason. Brandon isn't his boss.
Kelly the Dog Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 He obviously bypassed some chain of command, otherwise it wouldn't be an issue still. Even if he informed Pegula, but kept Brandon in the dark, that doesn't bode well for him to bypass his boss. There wouldn't have been as much finger pointing inside the organization if he went through the proper channels. Apparently he didn't. I'll ask you. Name the last good to great GM who was left hanging without a contract extension into the offseason. Brandon is not his boss.
FireChan Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 That's not applicable. He WOULD have reason to be fired if he came out in public and said yeah I discussed it with the Pegulas first when they would be the only ones that knew if he really did or not. Or the Pegulas gave him a Mulligan and showed "outward unity."
Kelly the Dog Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 Or the Pegulas gave him a Mulligan and showed "outward unity." Then all of this Whaley is in trouble and may be fired is moot.
FireChan Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 (edited) Then all of this Whaley is in trouble and may be fired is moot. Why? Because they didn't fire him in the beginning of TC means they're enamored with him? Second-chances don't extend forever. I swear, the mental gymnastics some of y'all go through. Edited December 8, 2015 by FireChan
GG Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 Brandon isn't his boss. Brandon is not his boss. He is the President of the Buffalo Bills, and sits higher up the food chain that Whaley. If he's the one with egg on his face with M&T, he would make sure that Whaley knew he screwed up.
Buftex Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 (edited) Agreed, the irony is that I think that Whaley is a lot better at his job than Rex is at his. When your right your right! Edited December 8, 2015 by Buftex
K D Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 So they're willing to spend whatever to get a super bowl, but won't cut fan favorites, even if they're over the hill? I understand wanting to treat your business partners with respect and like they're family, but getting upset about football decisions because they might conflict with marketing campaigns is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard of. If it comes out that this is true and they fire Whaley due to the outcry of cutting a 34 year and the conflict with the marketing campaign, than we are f**ked as a fan base for the next 30 years. Can you also show us how this hurt M&T bank? I saw Tim Graham post how cutting Fred a day before the marketing campaign came out was embarrassing and made a big deal about it. I told him that is stupid and basing football decisions on anything but football performance is moronic. It's dumb to us because we only care about football. It's not dumb to the Pegula's who have spent many years building up their brand and don't want to hurt their reputation by looking like the bad guys. They want to win but they want to do it the right way too. Whaley only cares about the team on the field but there are other things to consider when you look at the operation as a whole (unfortunately). Kim is hands on every day with the business so she is the one that looks bad when the top sponsor gets screwed out of a ton of money. They are still building their relationships and that was a bad look for them. As you can imagine they didn't like having to clean up that mess. But again that's not why they would get someone else. They just might not put up a fight if their new football czar wants to bring in his own people. Whaley would be snatched up in about 2 seconds though so maybe if it came down to it he might not want to stay anyhow
vorpma Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 1999 was the last year this team appeared in the playoffs; hired by the Bills in 2010. Less than spectacular drafts, head coaching hires, and the EJ Emanual pick. His future needs to be considered as well as the fact this organization still has a "losing culture."
Kelly the Dog Posted December 8, 2015 Posted December 8, 2015 He is the President of the Buffalo Bills, and sits higher up the food chain that Whaley. If he's the one with egg on his face with M&T, he would make sure that Whaley knew he screwed up. IMO he was definitely the one that went crying to Timmah. But that doesn't mean he is Whaley's boss. In fact, he has zero to do with football and Whaley, like Rex, reports directly to the Pegulas.
Recommended Posts